Tag Archives: myelofibrosis

Triple-Negative Myelofibrosis: Disease Features, Response to Treatment and Outcomes

Posted on by

Luis E. Aguirre, Akriti Jain, Somedeb Ball, Najla Al Ali, Virginia O. Volpe, Sara Tinsley-Vance, David Sallman, Kendra Sweet, Jeffrey Lancet, Eric Padrom, Seongseok Yun, Andrew Kuykendall, Rami Komrokji

Abstract

Background

Myelofibrosis is the most aggressive subtype among classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. About 90% of cases are driven by constitutive activation of 1 of 3 genes impacting the JAK/STAT pathway: JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) accounts for only 5-10% of cases and carries the worst outcomes. Little has been described about this subset of disease. Given the marked heterogeneity surrounding disease biology, clonal architecture, clinical presentation, and poor outcomes in TN-MF, identification of features of interest and assessment of treatment response are areas in need of further investigation.

Patients and methods

We collected and evaluated baseline clinical and molecular parameters from 626 patients with a diagnosis of myelofibrosis who presented to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa (Florida, US) between 2003-2021 and compared them based on presence or absence of the three classical phenotypic driver mutations.

Results

A small proportion of patients (6%) harbored TN-MF which correlated with inferior outcomes, marked by a 4-year reduction in overall survival time compared to the non-TN cohort (mOS 37.4 months vs. 85.7 months; p=.009) and higher rates of leukemic transformation. More pronounced thrombocytopenia and anemia, lower LDH, EPO levels, as well as lower percentage of marrow blasts at baseline were more commonly seen in TN-MF (p<0.05). Similarly, patients with TN-MF had higher risk disease per DIPSS+ and GIPSS. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling, specifically SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS, were more commonly seen among those lacking a classical phenotypic driver. The prevalence of co-mutant ASXL1/SRSF2 clones was significantly higher in TN-MF as was trisomy 8. TN patients had fewer responses (46.2% vs 63.4%) and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib.

Conclusion

TN-MF is invariably associated with significantly decreased survival and more aggressive clinical behavior with higher rates of leukemic transformation and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling (SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS) are more common in TN-MF, which likely drive its aggressive course and may account for suboptimal responses to JAK inhibition.

Read more

 

Combination Therapies and New Research Drive Progress in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Jordyn Sava

2023 brought a wave of positive developments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), particularly myelofibrosis. According to Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, one study of particular interest was the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) of ruxolitinib (Jakafi) with pelabresib (CPI-0610).1 

This study, in addition to the TRANSFORM-1 trial (NCT04472598), showed significant improvement in spleen size and potential benefits in symptom reduction with combination therapies compared with single-agent treatments, suggesting that these combinations could become valuable options for treating patients with myelofibrosis upfront.1,2

Other studies, including early data of TP-3654 and selinexor (Xpovio), show potential for further advancements in myelofibrosis treatment.

“There is a lot to be excited about for the first time in a very long time. There are all of these other small molecule inhibitors in clinical trials [and] I think we will learn a lot from that,” said Rampal, hematologic oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, in an interview with Targeted OncologyTM.

Read more

Ryvu Therapeutics to Present Preclinical Data on RVU120 and Synthetic Lethality Programs at the 2024 AACR Annual Meeting

Posted on by

Published: Mar 06, 2024

  • Updated preclinical data will be presented from Ryvu’s synthetic lethality pipeline, including PRMT5 inhibitors in MTAP-Deficient cancers, WRN inhibitors for the treatment of microsatellite unstable (MSI-H) tumors, and Ryvu’s cutting-edge synthetic lethality platform based on primary cancer cells.
  • Poster presentation to highlight the synergistic effects of RVU120 in combination with ruxolitinib in myeloproliferative neoplasms.
  • Ryvu’s partner Menarini to present data on MEN1703 (SEL24), demonstrating promising anti-tumor activity in preclinical models of myelofibrosis both as a single agent and combined with ruxolitinib.

KRAKOW, Poland, March 6, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Ryvu Therapeutics (WSE: RVU), a clinical-stage drug discovery and development company focusing on novel small molecule therapies that address emerging targets in oncology, announced today that preclinical data from its synthetic lethality pipeline and RVU120 project, as well as on MEN1703 (SEL24), will be presented at the upcoming 2024 AACR Annual Meeting, scheduled for April 5-10 in San Diego, California.

Read more

Broad next generation integrated sequencing of myelofibrosis identifies disease-specific and age-related genomic alterations

Posted on by
Malathi Kandarpa; Dan Robinson; Yi-Mi Wu; Tingting Qin; Kristen Pettit; Qing Li; Gary Luker; Maureen Sartor; Arul Chinnaiyan; Moshe Talpaz
Purpose: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by the overproduction of differentiated myeloid cells. Mutations in JAK2, CALR and MPL are considered drivers of Bcr-Abl-ve MPNs, including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prePMF) and overt myelofibrosis (MF). However, how these driver mutations lead to phenotypically distinct and/or overlapping diseases is unclear. Experimental Design: To compare the genetic landscape of MF to ET/PV/PrePMF, we sequenced 1711 genes for mutations along with whole transcriptome RNA-seq of 137 MPN patients. Results: In addition to driver mutations, 234 and 74 genes were found to be mutated in overt MF (N=106) and ET/PV/PrePMF (N=31), respectively. Overt MF had more mutations compared to ET/PV/prePMF (5 vs 4 per subject, P=0.006). Genes frequently mutated in MF included high-risk genes (ASXL1, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH1/2 and U2AF1), and Ras pathway genes. Mutations in NRAS, KRAS, SRSF2, EZH2, IDH2 and NF1, were exclusive to MF. Advancing age, higher DIPSS and poor overall survival (OS) correlated with increased variants in MF. Ras mutations were associated with higher leukocytes and platelets, and poor OS. The comparison of gene expression showed upregulation of proliferation and inflammatory pathways in MF. Notably, ADGRL4, DNASE1L3, PLEKHGB4, HSPG2, MAMDC2 and DPYSL3 were differentially expressed in hematopoietic stem and differentiated cells. Conclusions: Our results illustrate that evolution of MF from ET/PV/PrePMF likely advances with age, accumulation of mutations, and activation of proliferative pathways. The genes and pathways identified by integrated genomics approach provide insight into disease transformation and progression, and potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Read more

Addition of Parsaclisib to Ruxolitinib Decreases Spleen Volume and Improves Symptom Scores Among Patients With Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Jordan Kadish

02/23/2024

The addition of parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib treatment decreased spleen volume, improved symptom scores, and yielded acceptable safety among patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF), according to findings from a phase 2 trial published in Blood Advances.

Abdulraheem Yacoub, MD, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, and coauthors explained that although ruxolitinib has demonstrated beneficial results among patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, “suboptimal response may occur, potentially because of signaling via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B pathway.”

In this phase 2 trial, the study authors aimed to measure the potential benefit of adding PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib to ruxolitinib treatment among patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who did not have optimal responses to ruxolitinib alone. The primary end points were dosing, efficacy, and safety of this treatment combination.

All patients included in this study stayed on a stable dose of ruxolitinib. Among these patients, 32 were administered parsaclisib at 10 or 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then once weekly afterward (daily-to-weekly dosing). Additionally, 42 patients were administered parsaclisib at 5 or 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks, and then 5 mg once daily afterward (all-daily dosing).

Read more

JAK-STAT Pathway–Targeting Approaches in Myelofibrosis Are Evolving

Posted on by

Targeted Oncology Staff

During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Raajit K. Rampal, MD, gave an overview of the classification, risk assessment, and current therapy options for patients with myelofibrosis.

Targeted Oncology: What is the latest understanding of the classification and pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)?

RAAJIT K. RAMPAL, MD, PHD: Nothing has changed in terms of the 2022 [World Health Organization] classification, unlike what has happened with myelodysplastic syndrome.1 JAK-STAT signaling is a hallmark of MPN pathogenesis, and all of the mutations that we’re aware of at the moment—JAK2, CALR [calreticulin], and MPL—function in the JAK-STAT pathway. MPL is the thrombopoietin receptor which complexes with JAK [Janus kinase].

CALR is interesting, because CALR was discovered in 2013 but we think at the moment CALR complexes with MPL and results in the aberrant activation of MPL, but CALR does traffic to the cell surface.2,3 That makes it a target for immunotherapy. That is the target of a couple of clinical trials; one is open [LIMBER (NCT06034002)] and the other is about to open, which is really interesting [and] could change everything in MPNs.

All that being said, there are still at least 8% to 15% of myelofibrosis cases that are “triple negative.”2,3 If you look at those cases by gene expression profiling, they have the JAK-STAT signature. The issue with those cases is that we haven’t identified the particular lesion that occurs there, but it is a JAK-STAT–activated lesion, regardless of what the actual driver is. Those are the important things to think about with regards to how the disease is driven.

Read more

Molecular Genetic Profile of Myelofibrosis: Implications in the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment Advancements

Posted on by

by Tanvi Verma 1, Nikolaos Papadantonakis2, Deniz Peker Barclift1 and Linsheng Zhang

Simple Summary

Myelofibrosis refers to fibrosis in the bone marrow associated with certain bone marrow cancers. It is a characteristic of primary myelofibrosis and may develop later in other bone marrow cancers with overproduction of blood cells, such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. It has been confirmed that mutations in three key genes, Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), and myeloproliferative leukemia oncogene (MPL), can increase the activity of blood-producing cells, make them grow more actively, and are associated with the development of myelofibrosis. Approximately 80% of myelofibrosis cases carry additional mutations that often involve proteins that control how genes are turned on and off. The presence of mutations provides evidence of a cancerous process. The order in which these mutations occur can influence how the disease manifests. Studies have shown that fibrosis is secondary to the cancerous process and is closely linked to abnormal cell growth driven by mutations. Sophisticated scoring systems have been developed to guide treatment decisions. Specific mutations and genetic changes significantly affect the scores and survival of individual patients. Currently, common treatment involves JAK inhibitors, which can help improve clinical symptoms; however, only a small number of patients show significant alleviation in the biology of the malignant process. New treatments being explored in clinical trials include drugs that target the regulation of genes and substances that modulate the immune system or inflammatory processes. Combining these with JAK inhibitors shows promising results, especially in patients with complex genetic profiles. In the future, by studying more genes, it is expected that researchers will uncover the reasons behind cases where mutations are not found in the three key genes and understand how genetic changes are connected to variable disease presentations, ultimately guiding personalized treatment plans for better outcomes with a chance for cures.

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is an essential element of primary myelofibrosis, whereas secondary MF may develop in the advanced stages of other myeloid neoplasms, especially polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Over the last two decades, advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, particularly the integration of next-generation sequencing in clinical laboratories, have revolutionized the diagnosis, classification, and clinical decision making of myelofibrosis. Driver mutations involving JAK2, CALR, and MPL induce hyperactivity in the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which plays a central role in cell survival and proliferation. Approximately 80% of myelofibrosis cases harbor additional mutations, frequently in the genes responsible for epigenetic regulation and RNA splicing. Detecting these mutations is crucial for diagnosing myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), especially in cases where no mutations are present in the three driver genes (triple-negative MPNs). While fibrosis in the bone marrow results from the disturbance of inflammatory cytokines, it is fundamentally associated with mutation-driven hematopoiesis. The mutation profile and order of acquiring diverse mutations influence the MPN phenotype. Mutation profiling reveals clonal diversity in MF, offering insights into the clonal evolution of neoplastic progression. Prognostic prediction plays a pivotal role in guiding the treatment of myelofibrosis. Mutation profiles and cytogenetic abnormalities have been integrated into advanced prognostic scoring systems and personalized risk stratification for MF. Presently, JAK inhibitors are part of the standard of care for MF, with newer generations developed for enhanced efficacy and reduced adverse effects. However, only a minority of patients have achieved a significant molecular-level response. Clinical trials exploring innovative approaches, such as combining hypomethylation agents that target epigenetic regulators, drugs proven effective in myelodysplastic syndrome, or immune and inflammatory modulators with JAK inhibitors, have demonstrated promising results. These combinations may be more effective in patients with high-risk mutations and complex mutation profiles. Expanding mutation profiling studies with more sensitive and specific molecular methods, as well as sequencing a broader spectrum of genes in clinical patients, may reveal molecular mechanisms in cases currently lacking detectable driver mutations, provide a better understanding of the association between genetic alterations and clinical phenotypes, and offer valuable information to advance personalized treatment protocols to improve long-term survival and eradicate mutant clones with the hope of curing MF.

European Commission Approves Momelotinib for Myelofibrosis/Anemia

Posted on by

Ariana Pelosci

The European Commission granted marketing authorization to momelotinib (Omjjara) for patients with primary myelofibrosis who have disease-related splenomegaly or moderate to severe anemia, according to a press release from GSK.1

This indication also covers patients with post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis or post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis who are JAK inhibitor naïve or received previous treatment with ruxolitinib (Jakafi). The authorization is based on results from the phase 3 MOMENTUM trial (NCT04173494), which analyzed the use of momelotinib and danazol in patients with symptomatic and anemic myelofibrosis.2

“The challenges of living with myelofibrosis can be burdensome, and symptomatic patients can experience spleen enlargement, fatigue, night sweats, and bone pain. Until now, there have been no options specifically indicated to treat these symptoms in patients who also experience anemia. The authorization of [momelotinib] brings a new treatment option with a differentiated mechanism of action to these patients in the European Union,” Nina Mojas, senior vice president of Oncology Global Product Strategy at GSK, said in the press release.

In the trial, the total symptom score response at week 24 was 24.6% (95% CI, 17.49%-32.94%) for patients receiving momelotinib vs 9.2% (95% CI, 3.46%-19.02%) in the danazol arm (P = .0095). Additionally, a reduction of splenic volume by 25% occurred in 40.0% (95% CI, 31.51%-48.95%) of patients in the momelotinib arm vs 6.2% (95% CI, 1.70%-15.01%; P <.0001) in the danazol arm. A 35% reduction in spleen volume was also observed in 23.1% (95% CI, 16.14%-31.28%) in the momelotinib arm and 3.1% (95% CI, 0.37%-10.68%; P = .0006) in the danazol arm.

In September 2023, the FDA approved momelotinib for patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary and secondary myelofibrosis, who are experiencing anemia.3 In November 2023, the European Medicine’s Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use expressed a positive opinion for momelotinib.4 The positive opinion was one of the final steps leading to the approval of the drug in the European Union.

“I think [momelotinib] will make an immediate impact. There clearly are individuals now who are on JAK inhibitors like ruxolitinib or fedratinib [Inrebic] who have significant anemia who will immediately be potential candidates,” Ruben A. Mesa, MD, FACP, said in an interview with CancerNetwork® prior to the FDA approval. Mesa is the president of the Enterprise Cancer Service Line and senior vice president at Atrium Health; executive director of the National Cancer Institute-designated Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center; and vice dean for Cancer Programs at Wake Forest University School of Medicine.

References

  1. European Commission authorises GSK’s Omjjara (momelotinib). News release. GSK. January 29, 2024. Accessed January 29, 2024. https://shorturl.at/ntuvy
  2. Mesa RA, Gerds AT, Vannucchi A, et al. MPN-478 MOMENTUM: phase 3 randomized study of momelotinib (MMB) versus danazol (DAN) in symptomatic and anemic myelofibrosis (MF) patients previously treated with a JAK inhibitor. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 16):7002. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7002
  3. Ojjaara (momelotinib) approved in the US as the first and only treatment indicated for myelofibrosis patients with anaemia, News release. GSK. September 15, 2023. Accessed January 29, 2024. https://shorturl.at/jnNQY
  4. GSK receives positive CHMP opinion recommending momelotinib for myelofibrosis patients with anaemia. News release. GSK. November 13, 2023. Accessed January 29, 2024. https://bit.ly/3MEYpOl

Read more

Results from phase 1 of the MANIFEST clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of pelabresib in patients with myeloid malignancies

Posted on by

Eytan M. Stein, Amir T. Fathi, Wael A. Harb, Gozde Colak, Andrea Fusco & James K. Mangan

 

ABSTRACT

Pelabresib (CPI-0610), a BET protein inhibitor, is in clinical development for hematologic malignancies, given its ability to target NF-κB gene expression. The MANIFEST phase 1 study assessed pelabresib in patients with acute leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic (MDS) syndrome, or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPNs) (NCT02158858). Forty-four patients received pelabresib orally once daily (QD) at various doses (24–400 mg capsule or 225–275 mg tablet) on cycles of 14 d on and 7 d off. The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, decreased appetite, and fatigue. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 225 mg tablet QD. One patient with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) showed partial remission. In total, 25.8% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and 38.5% of high-risk MDS patients had stable disease. One AML patient and one CMML patient showed peripheral hematologic response. The favorable safety profile supports the ongoing pivotal study of pelabresib in patients with myelofibrosis using the recommended phase 2 dose of 125 mg tablet QD.

Read more

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Diagnosis, Outcomes, and Management of Prefibrotic Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Pankit Vacchani, Sanam Lohgavi, Prithviraj Bose

Abstract

Prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (prefibrotic PMF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with distinct characteristics comprising histopathological and clinico-biological parameters. It is classified as a subtype of primary myelofibrosis. In clinical practice, it is essential to correctly distinguish prefibrotic PMF from essential thrombocythemia especially but also overt PMF besides other myeloid neoplasms. Risk stratification and survival outcomes for prefibrotic PMF are worse than that of ET but better than that of overt PMF. Rates of progression to overt PMF and blast phase disease are also higher for prefibrotic PMF than ET. In this review we first discuss the historical context to the evolution of prefibrotic PMF as an entity, its presenting features and diagnostic criteria. We emphasize the differences between prefibrotic PMF, ET, and overt PMF with regards to presenting features and disease outcomes including thrombohemorrhagic events and progression to fibrotic and blast phase disease. Next, we discuss the risk stratification models and contextualize these in the setting of clinical management. We share our view of personalizing treatment to address unique patient needs in the context of currently available management options. Lastly, we discuss areas of critical need in clinical research and speculate on the possibility of future disease course modifying therapies in prefibrotic PMF.

Read more