Participants Discuss Treating a Patient With Myelofibrosis and Anemia

Posted on March 19, 2024March 19, 2024 by mpn_admin

March 18, 2024

Targeted Oncology Staff

CASE SUMMARY

A 76-year-old woman presented to her physician with symptoms of mild fatigue, night sweats, and abdominal pain/fullness for 4 months; she also reported an unexplained weight loss of 12 lb. Her spleen was palpable 8 cm below the left costal margin. She had no known comorbidities.

Laboratory values included a red blood cell count of 3.40 × 10⁶/μL, hemoglobin of 9.8 g/dL, and a platelet count of 181 × 10³/μL. Next-generation sequencing showed a JAK2 V617F mutation. Her karyotype was 46,XX. A bone marrow biopsy showed megakaryocyte proliferation and atypia with evidence of reticulin fibrosis. The patient received a diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis with a high-risk result from the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System, an intermediate risk result from the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System (MIPSS70), and a high risk result from the MIPSS70+ version 2.0.

Momelotinib for myelofibrosis: our 14 years of experience with 100 clinical trial patients and recent FDA approval

Posted on March 19, 2024March 19, 2024 by mpn_admin

Ayalew Tefferi & Animesh Pardanani

Momelotinib is an ATP-competitive small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase proteins (JAKi), including JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2; its other clinically relevant targets include activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1), also known as activin receptor like kinase 2 (ALK2) [1]. Momelotinib was recently approved (September 15, 2023) for use in anemic patients with high/intermediate risk myelofibrosis (MF), including primary (PMF) [2] and secondary variants, the latter emerging from antecedent polycythemia vera (post-PV) [3] or essential thrombocythemia (post-ET) [4]. All three MF variants belong to the broader category of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which are characterized by the presence of JAK-STAT activating mutations (JAK2, CALR or MPL) and predominantly megakaryocytic myeloproliferation with variable degrees of bone marrow fibrosis [5]. Patients with MF face premature death with 10-year survival estimates ranging from >80% in very low-risk diseases to <5% in very high-risk diseases [6]. In addition, the clinical course of the disease in MF is complicated by progressive anemia, extramedullary hematopoiesis with marked splenomegaly and hepatomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and cachexia. Causes of death in MF include disease transformation into acute myeloid leukemia [7].

Disease-, Age-, Genomic-Specific Factors Increase Risk of ET, PV, PrePMF Developing Into Overt MF

Posted on March 19, 2024March 19, 2024 by mpn_admin

March 16, 2024

Laura Joszt, MA

The risk of essential thrombocytopenia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PrePMF) developing into overt myelofibrosis (MF) increases with age, the accumulation of mutations, and the activation of proliferative pathways, which identifies new targets for therapeutic intervention.

The findings, based on an analysis of the mutational landscape of more than 1700 genes and the gene expression of various cells from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), was published in Clinical Cancer Research.¹

ET, PV, PMF, and MF are all part of a group of diseases MPNs, in which a mutation in the bone marrow causes too many red blood cells, white blood cells, or platelets.² In addition to being the most common MPNs, ET, PV, and PMF share the presence of mutations in either Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), and/or MPL.³ ET and PV are less aggressive forms of MPN, but they still can progress to MF. According to the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Pre-PMF will likely progress to PMF, “suggesting that more regular observations for pre-fibrotic PMF patients is warranted.”³

A phase I trial of pevonedistat in combination with ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

Posted on March 19, 2024March 19, 2024 by mpn_admin

March 13, 2024

Tim Kong, Nicole Gaudin, Karyn Gordon, Maggie J. Cox, Amy W. Zhou, and Stephen T. Oh

Abstract

Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors such as ruxolitinib have become standard-of-care therapy for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs); however, activation of alternate oncogenic pathways including nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) has limited durable response as single-agent therapy. With the rationale of targeting both pathways, we conducted a phase I dose escalation trial of pevonedistat in combination with ruxolitinib for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (NCT03386214). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with additional objectives of treatment efficacy and alterations of biomarkers. There were no dose-limiting toxicities observed with most adverse events being limited to grades 1/2. In secondary measures, anemia response was observed in two patients. Pro-inflammatory cytokines and iron parameters were longitudinally assessed, which revealed suppression of interleukin-6 and interferon-gamma in a dose-dependent manner across a subset of patients. These results suggest that combination therapy targeting both JAK2 and NFκB may hold clinical merit for MPN patients.

Childbirth rates in women with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on March 14, 2024March 14, 2024 by MPN Advocacy & Education

Published March 9, 2024

Anna Ravn Landtblom, Therese M-L Andersson, Anna L. V. Johansson, Frida E. Lundberg, Jan Samuelsson, Magnus Björkholm & Malin Hultcrantz

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with inferior pregnancy outcome, however, little is known about fertility and childbearing potential in women with MPN. In this study we aimed to describe reproductive patterns, as well as to quantify risk of miscarriage and stillbirth. Women aged 15–44 years with an MPN diagnosis 1973–2018, were identified in Swedish health care registers, and age-matched 1:4 to population controls. We identified 1141 women with MPN and 4564 controls. Women with MPN had a lower rate of childbirth (hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence interval was 0.78 (0.68–0.90)). Subgroup analysis showed that the rate was not significantly reduced in essential thrombocythemia, HR 1.02 (0.86–1.22) while the HR was 0.50 (0.33–0.76) in PV and 0.45 (0.28–0.74) in PMF. The risk of miscarriage was not significantly increased before MPN diagnosis, the HR during follow-up after diagnosis was 1.25 (0.89-1.76). Women with MPN were more likely to have had a previous stillbirth. Women with MPN had fewer children at diagnosis, and fewer children in total. In conclusion, the childbirth rate was lower among women with MPN than controls, but not among women with essential thrombocythemia.

A Review About the Assessment of the Bleeding and Thrombosis Risk for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Scheduled for Surgery

Posted on March 14, 2024March 14, 2024 by MPN Advocacy & Education

Mihaela Andreescu
Bogdan Andreescu

Published March 12, 2024

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) present a unique challenge in surgical management due to their inherent predisposition to both bleeding and thrombosis. MPNs are a heterogenous group of acquired clonal conditions. The three classic MPNs are essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (PMF), and polycythemia vera (PV). All subtypes of MPN are associated with both thrombotic and bleeding complications. There are four risk categories for thrombosis in MPN patients: age, thrombosis history, and JAK-2 mutation. They are further classified as very low, low, intermediate, and high risk. The genetic landscape of MPN is fascinating and complex like all myeloid disorders. Bleeding risk can be assessed through leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS), and a previous history of bleeding in a patient. Risk assessment and perioperative management are important aspects of improving the quality of life and preventing complications in surgeries. Preoperative management includes a risk assessment of venous thromboembolism, use of appropriate pharmacological treatment, platelet count control, and correction and cardiovascular risk factors. This review summarizes the assessment of bleeding and thrombosis risk for patients with MPNs scheduled for surgery. Furthermore, this review discusses various tools that can be used to identify MPN patients at risk of thrombosis prior to surgery.

Risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage and leukemic transformation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: A nationwide longitudinal cohort study

Posted on March 12, 2024March 12, 2024 by mpn_admin

Joon Young Hur, Nayeon Choi, Jung Hye Choi, Jiyeong Kim, Young-Woong Won

Abstract

Introduction

There are few large-scale, population-based studies detailing the risks of thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF).

Methods

We performed a nationwide longitudinal cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance System (NHIS) database. MPN patients (n = 11,991) and their 1:4 age- and sex-matched controls (n = 47,964) were enrolled. The risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards regression, and stratified analyses were performed for related factors.

Results

During a median of 7.8 years of follow-up, 30.1 % of MPN patients (3614/11,991) and 19.0 % of the matched controls (9141/47,964) developed arterial thrombosis, 11.6 % of MPN patients (1397/11,991) and 6.4 % of the matched controls (3099/47,964) developed venous thrombosis and 18.7 % of MPN patients (2251/11,991) and 12.1 % of the matched controls (5836/47,964) developed hemorrhage. 4.9 % of MPN patients (597/11,991) and 0.1 % of matched controls (50/47,964) developed leukemia. The overall risk of developing thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation was higher in MPN patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.695, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.629–1.765 for arterial thrombosis, aHR 1.963, 95 % CI: 1.838–2.096 for venous thrombosis, and aHR 1.714, 95 % CI: 1.630–1.802 for hemorrhage) than in the controls. Patients with MPNs had a 10-year cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation of 6.2 %.

Conclusion

The patients with MPNs have a higher risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation than matched controls. Strategies are warranted to reduce the risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation in MPN patients.

Recombinant interferon alfa in BCR/ABL-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on March 12, 2024March 12, 2024 by mpn_admin

El Bitar S ¹, Arcasoy MO ¹

Abstract

The treatment landscape for BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), driven by JAK2, CALR, and MPL mutations, has evolved significantly over the last decade. Recent regulatory approvals in polycythemia vera (PV) include the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib, and more recently, a novel recombinant interferon alfa-2 (IFN-α) therapeutic agent. Many clinical trials have documented the safety and efficacy of IFN-α therapy in PV and essential thrombocythemia, the classical BCR/ABL-negative MPNs. Used off-label for more than 30 years as a cytoreductive agent, IFN-α therapy promotes significant clinical, hematologic, and molecular responses. In some IFN-α-treated patients, partial or complete reduction of the mutant JAK2 allele burden may lead to a durable measurable residual disease state, owing to the ability of long-term IFN-α therapy to selectively deplete mutant JAK2-harboring hematopoietic stem cells. Pegylated IFN-α forms were developed to improve the drug stability and tolerability of first-generation IFN-α therapeutics. More recently, a novel pegylated IFN-α, ropeginterferon alfa-2b, received approval for PV by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019 and 2021, respectively. This article reviews the clinical research and recent advances that led to the first regulatory approval of IFN-α in a BCR/ABL-negative MPN and its future promise as a disease-modifying therapeutic agent.

A Review About the Assessment of the Bleeding and Thrombosis Risk for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Scheduled for Surgery

Posted on March 12, 2024March 12, 2024 by mpn_admin

Mihaela Andreescu • Bogdan Andreescu

Published March 12, 2024

Abstract

Triple-Negative Myelofibrosis: Disease Features, Response to Treatment and Outcomes

Posted on March 12, 2024March 12, 2024 by mpn_admin

Luis E. Aguirre, Akriti Jain, Somedeb Ball, Najla Al Ali, Virginia O. Volpe, Sara Tinsley-Vance, David Sallman, Kendra Sweet, Jeffrey Lancet, Eric Padrom, Seongseok Yun, Andrew Kuykendall, Rami Komrokji

Abstract

Background

Myelofibrosis is the most aggressive subtype among classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. About 90% of cases are driven by constitutive activation of 1 of 3 genes impacting the JAK/STAT pathway: JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) accounts for only 5-10% of cases and carries the worst outcomes. Little has been described about this subset of disease. Given the marked heterogeneity surrounding disease biology, clonal architecture, clinical presentation, and poor outcomes in TN-MF, identification of features of interest and assessment of treatment response are areas in need of further investigation.

Patients and methods

We collected and evaluated baseline clinical and molecular parameters from 626 patients with a diagnosis of myelofibrosis who presented to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa (Florida, US) between 2003-2021 and compared them based on presence or absence of the three classical phenotypic driver mutations.

Results

A small proportion of patients (6%) harbored TN-MF which correlated with inferior outcomes, marked by a 4-year reduction in overall survival time compared to the non-TN cohort (mOS 37.4 months vs. 85.7 months; p=.009) and higher rates of leukemic transformation. More pronounced thrombocytopenia and anemia, lower LDH, EPO levels, as well as lower percentage of marrow blasts at baseline were more commonly seen in TN-MF (p<0.05). Similarly, patients with TN-MF had higher risk disease per DIPSS+ and GIPSS. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling, specifically SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS, were more commonly seen among those lacking a classical phenotypic driver. The prevalence of co-mutant ASXL1/SRSF2 clones was significantly higher in TN-MF as was trisomy 8. TN patients had fewer responses (46.2% vs 63.4%) and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib.

Conclusion

TN-MF is invariably associated with significantly decreased survival and more aggressive clinical behavior with higher rates of leukemic transformation and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling (SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS) are more common in TN-MF, which likely drive its aggressive course and may account for suboptimal responses to JAK inhibition.