Prognostic Scores Validated for Additional Mutations in Secondary Myelofibrosis

July 11, 2024

An article in the American Journal of Hematology reported an in-depth characterization of clinical and molecular differences between primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). Researchers also found that two newer prognostic scores, the Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System 70 (MIPSS70) and MIPSS70+ v2.0, stratified risk in patients with secondary MF more accurately than the myelofibrosis secondary to polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia prognostic model (MYSEC-PM). These two scores also are the first to account for additional mutations besides SRSF2 status in patients with secondary MF.

Several prognostic scores have been developed for patient risk stratification and appropriate treatment allocation in primary MF. These include the IPSS, Dynamic IPSS (DIPSS), and DIPSS-plus. Studies have highlighted the prognostic significance of molecular alterations in primary MF, particularly mutations in High Molecular Risk (HMR) genes such as ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2, and U2AF1. Consequently, these genetic and molecular alterations were incorporated into the latest prognostic scores, including MIPSS70, MIPSS70-plus, and MIPSS70+ v2.0.

“As opposed to primary MF, few studies explored mutations prognosis significance in secondary MF,” explained Matteo Guerra and colleagues. “The MYSEC-PM was specifically developed for secondary MF and displays a more accurate prognostic performance than IPSS and DIPSS. However, no molecular prognostic models accounting for additional mutations in SMF have yet been described.”

Read more

Observational MOST Trial Reveals Progression Trends in Low-Risk Myelofibrosis

July 11, 2024

Author(s):Jax DiEugenio

Findings from the prospective, observational MOST trial (NCT02953704) showed that 58.5% of patients with low- or intermediate-1–risk myelofibrosis enrolled in cohort A (n = 205) met at least 1 criterion for disease progression after a median follow-up of less than 53 months, which was a higher rate than investigators expected, according to Aaron Gerds, MD.

Cohort A included patients with low-risk or intermediate-1–risk disease, where patients were considered to have intermediate-1–risk myelofibrosis based on age only. Cohort B (n = 27) featured patients with intermediate-1–risk disease with other Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) risk factors beyond age.

Findings presented at the 2024 EHA Congress showed that of the 120 patients in cohort A who experienced disease progression, 64 (53.3%) met 1 criterion for progression, 27 (22.5%) met 2 criteria, and 29 (24.2%) met at least 3 disease progression criteria. The most common progression criteria met in cohort A included a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL (47.5%) and a platelet count of less than 100 x 109/L (31.7%). For Cohort B, 25 patients (92.6%) met 1 progression criterion, 1 patient (3.7%) met 2 progression criteria, and 1 patient (3.7%) met 3 progression criteria.

Read more

Myelofibrosis management in routine clinical practice with a focus on patients with cytopenias: recommendations from a global consensus group

Steffen Koschmieder, Prithviraj Bose, Martin H. Ellis, Vikas Gupta, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, John Mascarenhas, Vikram Mathews, Francesco Passamonti & Claire Harrison

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a Philadelphia chromosome (BCR::ABL1)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, a hallmark of which is progressive deposition of fibrotic tissue in bone marrow [1]. Clinical manifestations of MF often include splenomegaly, cytopenias (such as severe anemia), and extramedullary hematopoiesis [1]. The Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) therapies ruxolitinib (RUX) and fedratinib (FED) have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in splenic volume reduction and symptom improvement, but they may induce treatment-related anemia and thrombocytopenia [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Other JAKi options include pacritinib (PAC), which received FDA approval in 2022 for patients with MF and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50 × 109/l), and momelotinib (MMB), which received FDA and EMA approval in 2023/2024, respectively, for patients with MF and anemia [10,11,12]. Clinical trials with JAKis in MF are summarized in reference [1].

National and international guidelines exist for the management of MF; however, a need remains for practical guidance applicable in everyday clinical practice, especially for patients experiencing cytopenias or potential failure of current therapy. The landscape is further complicated by the availability of multiple prognostic tools for MF; as such, clinicians may find disease prognostication challenging and confusing. Additionally, to maximize clinical applicability of trial data, inclusivity of eligibility criteria in the context of the real-world MF patient population should be considered.

Recognizing these significant challenges, an international expert consensus group was established to provide best practice recommendations for healthcare professionals, intending to supplement, but not replace, existing guidelines.

Read more

Mascarenhas on the SENTRY Trial Design and Goals

J

By John Mascarenhas, MD

John Mascarenhas, MD, professor, medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, director, Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, member, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, discusses the methods, design, and inclusion criteria of the phase 3 SENTRY trial (NCT04562389) for patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.

SENTRY is a global, multicenter, phase 1/3 study where investigators are assessing the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) combined with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in this patient population.

According to Mascarenhas, the primary end points of phase 3 of the trial include the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of greater than or equal to 35% at week 24 (SVR35), and the proportion of patients with a total symptom score reduction of greater than or equal to 50% at week 24 (TSS50), as measured by the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form V4.0.

Read more

Ph- MPN in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients

June 26, 2024

Elizabeth L. Courville, MD

England JT, Szuber N, Sirhan S, et al. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of a pan-Canadian cohort of adolescents and young adults with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a Canadian MPN group study. Leukemia. 2024;38(3):570-578.

The classical BCR:: ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph- MPNs) polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are typically diseases of older adults, with a median age at diagnosis within the sixth decade of life. In two large case series from cancer centers in the United States, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients were reported to account for 11 to 12% of the Ph- MPNs evaluated.1,2  The data on AYA patients with Ph- MPNs is less robust than that available for their older counterparts, and this patient population may not be represented in cohorts used to develop prognostic scoring systems.

Recently, James T. England, MD, MSc, and colleagues investigated the clinical features and long-term outcomes of a cohort of 609 patients (17 pediatric patients aged <18 years and 592 patients aged 18-45 years) with Ph- MPNs from across eight participating centers in Canada. Initial diagnoses are shown in Figure 1. Clinical features from the current study cohort are compared with those of a 2018 Mayo Clinic AYA cohort1  (Table). The patients were diagnosed between 2000 and 2022, with MPN driver mutation analysis performed in 89% and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of clinically relevant myeloid genes performed in 48%. More than one-third of patients (211) had NGS testing first performed during initial disease phase, with a median time from diagnosis of 3.9 years (range, 0-29 years). Sixty-four patients had NGS first performed during the post-ET/post-PV secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) phase, while 19 had NGS first performed during the accelerated phase (AP)/blast phase (BP) of disease. Non-MPN driver mutations were detected in a higher proportion of patients evaluated during disease progression (secondary myelofibrosis or elevated blasts) than during initial disease phase, including more frequent high molecular risk (HMR) mutations (Figure 2). Mutations defined as HMR included pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in ASXL1EZH2IDH1/2SRSF2TP53, and U2AF1Q157. Among those patients with NGS testing performed during the initial disease phase, additional mutations were most frequently detected in those with overt PMF (26%).

Read more

JAK Inhibitor–Based Combinations Could Represent the Next Frontier in Myelofibrosis

Ryan Scott

In an interview with OncLive® following the Vanderbilt Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy Symposium, Ashwin Kishtagari, MD, discussed advancements in the treatment of patients with intermediate-risk to high-risk myelofibrosis and highlighted recent data from the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting for combination therapies using JAK inhibitors.

Studies presented at the meeting included the phase 3 TRANSFORM-1 clinical trial (NCT04472598) evaluating navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Jakafi), as well as the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) investigating pelabresib (CPI-0610) in combination with ruxolitinib.1,2

Kishtagari, who serves as an assistant professor of medicine in the Department of Hematology and Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, as well as a clinical research fellow in Bick Lab at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, provided further updates on JAK inhibitors for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis in another interview with OncLive.

OncLive: How do you see the treatment paradigm for myelofibrosis evolving in the future?

Kishtagari: We have 4 JAK inhibitors which are FDA approved for the treatment of [patients with] myelofibrosis, with the first being ruxolitinib. Fedratinib [Inrebic] was the second agent approved in 2019. Pacritinib [Vonjo] was approved by the FDA in 2022, and momelotinib [Ojjaara]was approved in 2023.

We are moving toward combination therapies because our goal is to have a more significant improvement in splenomegaly response and symptom improvement. The whole field of myelofibrosis is moving toward combination therapy, especially for patients with higher- or intermediate-risk myelofibrosis.

Read more

Sobi to present new myelofibrosis data at the ASCO 2024 Annual Meeting

WALTHAM, Mass., May 24, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sobi North America, the North American affiliate of Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB (Sobi®), today announced the presentation of three abstracts that highlights data from its myelofibrosis treatment option at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting taking place in Chicago from May 31 – June 4, 2024.

Sobi’s commitment to delivering innovative treatments for people living with hematological diseases is seen in global studies spanning multiple rare disorders, including myelofibrosis.

A retrospective analysis will be presented that demonstrates the efficacy of pacritinib in spleen volume reduction, symptom benefit and red blood cell transfusion response, compared with best available therapy, in patients with myelofibrosis who have both thrombocytopenia and anemia.

An additional retrospective analysis will be presented that shows the substantial symptom benefit pacritinib provides compared with best available therapy or low-dose ruxolitinib, specifically in patients who required red blood cell transfusion at the time of pacritinib initiation. The number of patients experiencing treatment emergent Grade 3 anaemia was similar between pacritinib and BAT groups.

New real-world data will be presented that demonstrates treatment with pacritinib provides stability or improvement in thrombocytopenia and/or anemia in patients with myelofibrosis, regardless of baseline counts, and has favorable overall survival similar to other JAK inhibitor historical controls.

Read more

Metformin Use Linked to Lower Odds of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

By: Elana Gotkine

Medically Reviewed By: Mark Arredondo, M.D.

THURSDAY, May 23, 2024 (HealthDay News) — Metformin use, including long-term use, is associated with significantly lower odds of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) diagnosis, according to a study published online May 17 in Blood Advances.

Daniel Tuyet Kristensen, M.D., from Aalborg University Hospital in Denmark, and colleagues conducted a population-based case-control study using Danish registers to examine the association between metformin use and the risk for MPN. Cases with MPN diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were identified, and metformin use prior to MPN diagnosis was ascertained. Metformin use was compared among cases with MPN and an age- and sex-matched control group from the Danish general population (3,816 cases and 19,080 controls).

The researchers found that 7.0 and 8.2 percent of cases and controls were categorized as ever-users of metformin, respectively (odds ratio [OR] for MPN, 0.84; adjusted OR for MPN, 0.70). Long-term metformin use (at least five years) was more infrequent and occurred in 1.1 and 2.0 percent of cases and controls, respectively (OR, 0.57; adjusted OR, 0.45). When cumulative duration of treatment was analyzed, there was a dose-response relationship observed; in stratified analyses of sex, age, and MPN subtypes, this was consistent.

Scientists team up with York Hospital to study DNA mutations behind blood cancers

Posted on 23 May 2024

Scientists from the University of York are working with doctors and patients at York Hospital to understand the DNA mutations linked to a group of chronic blood cancers, and investigate why, in some cases, they can suddenly become more aggressive.

The researchers, from the newly formed Centre for Blood Research at the University of York, are recruiting participants from York Hospital with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), a group of blood cancers characterised by the overproduction of red blood cells and/or platelets.

There are around 4,000 cases of MPNs in the UK each year and they most commonly affect people over 60. Often, they remain stable and progress slowly, which means people can live with them for a long time without being very unwell.

However, in a few rare cases, they can transform into more aggressive cancers which need urgent treatment, such as acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), where faulty myeloid cells – which include red blood cells and platelets – build up in the body and stop the blood and immune system from functioning normally.

Valuable insights

Dr Katherine Bridge, from the Department of Biology and Centre for Blood Research at the University of York, said: “We want to better understand the DNA mutations that cause these cancers, and to see whether there are additional factors that cause them to suddenly transform and become more aggressive.

“MPNs behave like the early stages of other blood cancers, offering valuable insights into their progression. Often, these crucial initial stages occur too quickly in other cancers for us to be able to track them effectively. By focusing on MPNs, we have a unique opportunity to scrutinise these early events, potentially uncovering strategies to halt the advancement of more aggressive malignancies.”

Read more

JAK Inhibitor–Based Combinations Could Represent the Next Frontier in Myelofibrosis

Ryan Scott

In an interview with OncLive® following the Vanderbilt Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapy Symposium, Ashwin Kishtagari, MD, discussed advancements in the treatment of patients with intermediate-risk to high-risk myelofibrosis and highlighted recent data from the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting for combination therapies using JAK inhibitors.

Studies presented at the meeting included the phase 3 TRANSFORM-1 clinical trial (NCT04472598)evaluating navitoclax plus ruxolitinib (Jakafi), as well as the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) investigating pelabresib (CPI-0610) in combination with ruxolitinib.1,2

Kishtagari, who serves as an assistant professor of medicine in the Department of Hematology and Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, as well as a clinical research fellow in Bick Lab at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee, provided further updates on JAK inhibitors for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis in another interview with OncLive.

OncLive: How do you see the treatment paradigm for myelofibrosis evolving in the future?

Kishtagari: We have 4 JAK inhibitors which are FDA approved for the treatment of [patients with] myelofibrosis, with the first being ruxolitinib. Fedratinib [Inrebic] was the second agent approved in 2019. Pacritinib [Vonjo] was approved by the FDA in 2022, and momelotinib [Ojjaara]was approved in 2023.

We are moving toward combination therapies because our goal is to have a more significant improvement in splenomegaly response and symptom improvement. The whole field of myelofibrosis is moving toward combination therapy, especially for patients with higher- or intermediate-risk myelofibrosis.

Read more