Tag Archives: mpn

Risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage and leukemic transformation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: A nationwide longitudinal cohort study

Posted on by

Joon Young Hur, Nayeon Choi, Jung Hye Choi, Jiyeong Kim, Young-Woong Won

Abstract

Introduction

There are few large-scale, population-based studies detailing the risks of thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF).

Methods

We performed a nationwide longitudinal cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance System (NHIS) database. MPN patients (n = 11,991) and their 1:4 age- and sex-matched controls (n = 47,964) were enrolled. The risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation was estimated using a Cox proportional hazards regression, and stratified analyses were performed for related factors.

Results

During a median of 7.8 years of follow-up, 30.1 % of MPN patients (3614/11,991) and 19.0 % of the matched controls (9141/47,964) developed arterial thrombosis, 11.6 % of MPN patients (1397/11,991) and 6.4 % of the matched controls (3099/47,964) developed venous thrombosis and 18.7 % of MPN patients (2251/11,991) and 12.1 % of the matched controls (5836/47,964) developed hemorrhage. 4.9 % of MPN patients (597/11,991) and 0.1 % of matched controls (50/47,964) developed leukemia. The overall risk of developing thrombosis, hemorrhage, leukemic transformation was higher in MPN patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.695, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.629–1.765 for arterial thrombosis, aHR 1.963, 95 % CI: 1.838–2.096 for venous thrombosis, and aHR 1.714, 95 % CI: 1.630–1.802 for hemorrhage) than in the controls. Patients with MPNs had a 10-year cumulative incidence of leukemic transformation of 6.2 %.

Conclusion

The patients with MPNs have a higher risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation than matched controls. Strategies are warranted to reduce the risk of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation in MPN patients.

Read more

A Review About the Assessment of the Bleeding and Thrombosis Risk for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Scheduled for Surgery

Posted on by

Mihaela Andreescu • Bogdan Andreescu

Published March 12, 2024

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) present a unique challenge in surgical management due to their inherent predisposition to both bleeding and thrombosis. MPNs are a heterogenous group of acquired clonal conditions. The three classic MPNs are essential thrombocythemia (ET), myelofibrosis (PMF), and polycythemia vera (PV). All subtypes of MPN are associated with both thrombotic and bleeding complications. There are four risk categories for thrombosis in MPN patients: age, thrombosis history, and JAK-2 mutation. They are further classified as very low, low, intermediate, and high risk. The genetic landscape of MPN is fascinating and complex like all myeloid disorders. Bleeding risk can be assessed through leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS), and a previous history of bleeding in a patient. Risk assessment and perioperative management are important aspects of improving the quality of life and preventing complications in surgeries. Preoperative management includes a risk assessment of venous thromboembolism, use of appropriate pharmacological treatment, platelet count control, and correction and cardiovascular risk factors. This review summarizes the assessment of bleeding and thrombosis risk for patients with MPNs scheduled for surgery. Furthermore, this review discusses various tools that can be used to identify MPN patients at risk of thrombosis prior to surgery.

Read more

Triple-Negative Myelofibrosis: Disease Features, Response to Treatment and Outcomes

Posted on by

Luis E. Aguirre, Akriti Jain, Somedeb Ball, Najla Al Ali, Virginia O. Volpe, Sara Tinsley-Vance, David Sallman, Kendra Sweet, Jeffrey Lancet, Eric Padrom, Seongseok Yun, Andrew Kuykendall, Rami Komrokji

Abstract

Background

Myelofibrosis is the most aggressive subtype among classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. About 90% of cases are driven by constitutive activation of 1 of 3 genes impacting the JAK/STAT pathway: JAK2, CALR, and MPL. Triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) accounts for only 5-10% of cases and carries the worst outcomes. Little has been described about this subset of disease. Given the marked heterogeneity surrounding disease biology, clonal architecture, clinical presentation, and poor outcomes in TN-MF, identification of features of interest and assessment of treatment response are areas in need of further investigation.

Patients and methods

We collected and evaluated baseline clinical and molecular parameters from 626 patients with a diagnosis of myelofibrosis who presented to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa (Florida, US) between 2003-2021 and compared them based on presence or absence of the three classical phenotypic driver mutations.

Results

A small proportion of patients (6%) harbored TN-MF which correlated with inferior outcomes, marked by a 4-year reduction in overall survival time compared to the non-TN cohort (mOS 37.4 months vs. 85.7 months; p=.009) and higher rates of leukemic transformation. More pronounced thrombocytopenia and anemia, lower LDH, EPO levels, as well as lower percentage of marrow blasts at baseline were more commonly seen in TN-MF (p<0.05). Similarly, patients with TN-MF had higher risk disease per DIPSS+ and GIPSS. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling, specifically SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS, were more commonly seen among those lacking a classical phenotypic driver. The prevalence of co-mutant ASXL1/SRSF2 clones was significantly higher in TN-MF as was trisomy 8. TN patients had fewer responses (46.2% vs 63.4%) and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib.

Conclusion

TN-MF is invariably associated with significantly decreased survival and more aggressive clinical behavior with higher rates of leukemic transformation and shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib. Mutations impacting RNA splicing, epigenetic modification and signaling (SRSF2, SETBP1, IDH2, CBL and GNAS) are more common in TN-MF, which likely drive its aggressive course and may account for suboptimal responses to JAK inhibition.

Read more

 

Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Marina Kremyanskaya, M.D., Ph.D., Andrew T. Kuykendall, M.D., Naveen Pemmaraju, M.D., Ellen K. Ritchie, M.D., Jason Gotlib, M.D., Aaron Gerds, M.D., Jeanne Palmer, M.D., Kristen Pettit, M.D., Uttam K. Nath, M.D., Abdulraheem Yacoub, M.D., Arturo Molina, M.D., Samuel R. Saks, M.D., et al., for the REVIVE Trial Investigators*

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown.

METHODS

 

In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms).

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P=0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040. opens in new tab.)

Read more

AYA With MPN Face Psychological Needs That Are Poorly Understood

Posted on by

Laura Joszt, MA

Up to 20% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are adolescent and young adults (AYAs) and the population is growing; however, there is a paucity of data on the psychological needs of AYAs with MPN, according to a systematic scoping review published in Leukemia & Lymphoma.1

Previous research has shown AYAs with cancer can be overlooked2 and there is little information on how this population does during treatment and survivorship,3 but they can face unique psychosocial issues that impact their quality of life.4

“While the MPN AYA group generally reports a similar symptom burden to the adults with MPN, very little is known about the psychological impact and management of AYA with MPN,” the authors wrote. “Understanding psychosocial issues patients with MPN face are critical given the demands of cancer, and its treatment is often directly counter to the developmental needs of the age group.”

Read more

ROP-ET: a prospective phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in essential thrombocythemia patients with limited treatment options

Posted on by

Published: 

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Francisca Ferrer Marin, Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali, Alberto Alvarez-Larrán, Eloise Beggiato, Maria Bieniaszewska, Massimo Breccia, Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch, Olga Cerna, Ana-Manuela Crisan, Catalin Doru Danaila, Valerio De Stefano, Konstanze Döhner, Victoria Empson, Joanna Gora-Tybor, Martin Griesshammer, Sebastian Grosicki, Paola Guglielmelli, Valentin García-Gutierrez, Florian H. Heidel, Arpád Illés, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Chloe James, Steffen Koschmieder, Maria-Theresa Krauth, Kurt Krejcy, Mihaela-Cornelia Lazaroiu, Jiri Mayer, Zsolt György Nagy, Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini, Francesca Palandri, Vassiliki Pappa, Andreas Johannes Reiter, Tomasz Sacha, Stefanie Schlager, Stefan Schmidt, Evangelos Terpos, Martin Unger, Albert Wölfler, Blanca Xicoy Cirici & Christoph Klade

Abstract

Interferon-based therapies, such as ropeginterferon alfa-2b have emerged as promising disease-modifying agents for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocythemia (ET). Current ET treatments aim to normalize hematological parameters and reduce the thrombotic risk, but they do not modify the natural history of the disease and hence, have no impact on disease progression. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (trade name BESREMi®), a novel, monopegylated interferon alfa-2b with an extended administration interval, has demonstrated a robust and sustained efficacy in polycythemia vera (PV) patients. Given the similarities in disease pathophysiology and treatment goals, ropeginterferon alfa-2b holds promise as a treatment option for ET. The ROP-ET trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase III study that includes patients with ET who are intolerant or resistant to, and/or are ineligible for current therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU), anagrelide (ANA), busulfan (BUS) and pipobroman, leaving these patients with limited treatment options. The primary endpoint is a composite response of hematologic parameters and disease-related symptoms, according to modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. Secondary endpoints include improvements in symptoms and quality of life, molecular response and the safety profile of ropeginterferon alfa-2b. Over a 3-year period the trial assesses longer term outcomes, particularly the effects on allele burden and clinical outcomes, such as disease-related symptoms, vascular events and disease progression. No prospective clinical trial data exist for ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the planned ET study population and this study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for ET patients with limited alternatives.

Read more

SHP2 inhibition displays efficacy as a monotherapy and in combination with JAK2 inhibition in preclinical models of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

Garima Pandey 1, Lucia Mazzacurati 1, Tegan M Rowsell 1, Nathan P Horvat 2, Narmin E Amin 1, Guolin Zhang 3, Afua A Akuffo 2, Christelle M Colin-Leitzinger 2, Eric B Haura 3, Andrew T Kuykendall 4, Ling Zhang 5, Pearlie K Epling-Burnette 2, Gary W Reuther 1 4

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and primary myelofibrosis, are clonal hematopoietic neoplasms driven by mutationally activated signaling by the JAK2 tyrosine kinase. Although JAK2 inhibitors can improve MPN patients’ quality of life, they do not induce complete remission as disease-driving cells persistently survive therapy. ERK activation has been highlighted as contributing to JAK2 inhibitor persistent cell survival. As ERK is a component of signaling by activated RAS proteins and by JAK2 activation, we sought to inhibit RAS activation to enhance responses to JAK2 inhibition in preclinical MPN models. We found the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 significantly enhanced growth inhibition of MPN cell lines in combination with the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, effectively preventing ruxolitinib persistent growth, and the growth and viability of established ruxolitinib persistent cells remained sensitive to SHP2 inhibition. Both SHP2 and JAK2 inhibition diminished cellular RAS-GTP levels, and their concomitant inhibition enhanced ERK inactivation and increased apoptosis. Inhibition of SHP2 inhibited the neoplastic growth of MPN patient hematopoietic progenitor cells and exhibited synergy with ruxolitinib. RMC-4550 antagonized MPN phenotypes and increased survival of an MPN mouse model driven by MPL-W515L. The combination of RMC-4550 and ruxolitinib, which was safe and tolerated in healthy mice, further inhibited disease compared to ruxolitinib monotherapy, including extending survival. Given SHP2 inhibitors are undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with solid tumors, our preclinical findings suggest that SHP2 is a candidate therapeutic target with potential for rapid translation to clinical assessment to improve current targeted therapies for MPN patients.

Read more

Review Details Current State of Essential Thrombocythemia Diagnosis and Care

Posted on by
Vicki Moore, PhD

A review published in the American Journal of Hematology details current aspects of diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of essential thrombocythemia (ET). The review was written by Ayalew Tefferi, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota; Alessandro Maria Vannucchi, MD, of the University of Florence in Florence, Italy; and Tiziano Barbui, MD, of Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Bergamo, Italy.

Regarding ET diagnosis, Tefferi and colleagues highlighted criteria from the International Consensus Classification. This system involves multiple criteria for ET diagnosis, such as thrombocytosis (with a platelet count ≥450×109/L), exclusion of other myeloid neoplasms, and other features, such as possible mutation of JAK2, CALR, or MPL. However, the authors noted, up to 20% of patients having ET might be negative for mutations in all 3 of these genes.

According to data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry in the US, the 5-year survival rate among 8768 patients with ET was 88.7%. The median survival time for this population was 12.1 years.

Among risk factors related to survival with ET, the authors considered age to be most important. Additional risk factors identified for survival vary by the risk model being used. The triple A survival risk model, for example, includes absolute neutrophil count and absolute lymphocyte count, in addition to age, and stratifies patients into 4 risk groups with median survival times ranging from 8 years in the high-risk group to 47 years in the low-risk group. The authors emphasized age, presence of a thrombosis history, and presence of JAK2 mutation as risk factors for thrombosis with ET.

In describing their treatment approach to ET, the authors indicated they began with consideration of thrombosis risk stratification, with some treatment options within thrombosis risk groups based on cardiovascular risk.

Read more

Rusfertide Improves Responses in Phlebotomy-Dependent Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Caroline Seymour

Patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera, a type of myeloproliferative neoplasm, treated with rusfertide experienced a response rate of 60% (n = 18/30) compared with 17% (n = 5/29) in those who received placebo (P = .002), according to updated findings from part 2 of the phase 2 REVIVE trial (NCT04057040) published in the New England Journal of Medicine.1

The international trial was designed with 3 parts: a 28-week, open-label, dose-finding portion in which rusfertide was added to a patient’s ongoing therapy of phlebotomy alone or cytoreductive therapy with optional phlebotomy; a double-blind, randomized withdrawal portion wherein patients were randomly assigned to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks (weeks 29 to 41); and an open-label extension period following patients on rusfertide therapy for up to 3 years.

Findings from part 1 showed that the estimated mean number of annual phlebotomies was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). Moreover, the mean maximum hematocrit level was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 vs 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. Patient quality of life was also improved on rusfertide, with a lower severity of disease-related symptoms.

“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating [patients with] polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, an associate professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology) at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York, and lead author of the study, stated in a news release.2 “Pending further clinical studies, this injectable agent could become a valuable therapeutic tool for a disease which many patients and their physicians struggle to bring under control.”

Read more

Combination Therapies and New Research Drive Progress in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Jordyn Sava

2023 brought a wave of positive developments for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), particularly myelofibrosis. According to Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD, one study of particular interest was the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) of ruxolitinib (Jakafi) with pelabresib (CPI-0610).1 

This study, in addition to the TRANSFORM-1 trial (NCT04472598), showed significant improvement in spleen size and potential benefits in symptom reduction with combination therapies compared with single-agent treatments, suggesting that these combinations could become valuable options for treating patients with myelofibrosis upfront.1,2

Other studies, including early data of TP-3654 and selinexor (Xpovio), show potential for further advancements in myelofibrosis treatment.

“There is a lot to be excited about for the first time in a very long time. There are all of these other small molecule inhibitors in clinical trials [and] I think we will learn a lot from that,” said Rampal, hematologic oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, in an interview with Targeted OncologyTM.

Read more