ROP-ET: a prospective phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in essential thrombocythemia patients with limited treatment options

Posted on March 11, 2024March 11, 2024 by mpn_admin

Published: 04 March 2024

Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Francisca Ferrer Marin, Haifa Kathrin Al-Ali, Alberto Alvarez-Larrán, Eloise Beggiato, Maria Bieniaszewska, Massimo Breccia, Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch, Olga Cerna, Ana-Manuela Crisan, Catalin Doru Danaila, Valerio De Stefano, Konstanze Döhner, Victoria Empson, Joanna Gora-Tybor, Martin Griesshammer, Sebastian Grosicki, Paola Guglielmelli, Valentin García-Gutierrez, Florian H. Heidel, Arpád Illés, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Chloe James, Steffen Koschmieder, Maria-Theresa Krauth, Kurt Krejcy, Mihaela-Cornelia Lazaroiu, Jiri Mayer, Zsolt György Nagy, Franck-Emmanuel Nicolini, Francesca Palandri, Vassiliki Pappa, Andreas Johannes Reiter, Tomasz Sacha, Stefanie Schlager, Stefan Schmidt, Evangelos Terpos, Martin Unger, Albert Wölfler, Blanca Xicoy Cirici & Christoph Klade

Abstract

Interferon-based therapies, such as ropeginterferon alfa-2b have emerged as promising disease-modifying agents for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocythemia (ET). Current ET treatments aim to normalize hematological parameters and reduce the thrombotic risk, but they do not modify the natural history of the disease and hence, have no impact on disease progression. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (trade name BESREMi®), a novel, monopegylated interferon alfa-2b with an extended administration interval, has demonstrated a robust and sustained efficacy in polycythemia vera (PV) patients. Given the similarities in disease pathophysiology and treatment goals, ropeginterferon alfa-2b holds promise as a treatment option for ET. The ROP-ET trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm phase III study that includes patients with ET who are intolerant or resistant to, and/or are ineligible for current therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU), anagrelide (ANA), busulfan (BUS) and pipobroman, leaving these patients with limited treatment options. The primary endpoint is a composite response of hematologic parameters and disease-related symptoms, according to modified European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. Secondary endpoints include improvements in symptoms and quality of life, molecular response and the safety profile of ropeginterferon alfa-2b. Over a 3-year period the trial assesses longer term outcomes, particularly the effects on allele burden and clinical outcomes, such as disease-related symptoms, vascular events and disease progression. No prospective clinical trial data exist for ropeginterferon alfa-2b in the planned ET study population and this study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for ET patients with limited alternatives.

SHP2 inhibition displays efficacy as a monotherapy and in combination with JAK2 inhibition in preclinical models of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on March 11, 2024March 11, 2024 by mpn_admin

Garima Pandey¹, Lucia Mazzacurati¹, Tegan M Rowsell¹, Nathan P Horvat², Narmin E Amin¹, Guolin Zhang³, Afua A Akuffo², Christelle M Colin-Leitzinger², Eric B Haura³, Andrew T Kuykendall⁴, Ling Zhang⁵, Pearlie K Epling-Burnette², Gary W Reuther^1 4

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythemia vera, essential thrombocytosis, and primary myelofibrosis, are clonal hematopoietic neoplasms driven by mutationally activated signaling by the JAK2 tyrosine kinase. Although JAK2 inhibitors can improve MPN patients’ quality of life, they do not induce complete remission as disease-driving cells persistently survive therapy. ERK activation has been highlighted as contributing to JAK2 inhibitor persistent cell survival. As ERK is a component of signaling by activated RAS proteins and by JAK2 activation, we sought to inhibit RAS activation to enhance responses to JAK2 inhibition in preclinical MPN models. We found the SHP2 inhibitor RMC-4550 significantly enhanced growth inhibition of MPN cell lines in combination with the JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib, effectively preventing ruxolitinib persistent growth, and the growth and viability of established ruxolitinib persistent cells remained sensitive to SHP2 inhibition. Both SHP2 and JAK2 inhibition diminished cellular RAS-GTP levels, and their concomitant inhibition enhanced ERK inactivation and increased apoptosis. Inhibition of SHP2 inhibited the neoplastic growth of MPN patient hematopoietic progenitor cells and exhibited synergy with ruxolitinib. RMC-4550 antagonized MPN phenotypes and increased survival of an MPN mouse model driven by MPL-W515L. The combination of RMC-4550 and ruxolitinib, which was safe and tolerated in healthy mice, further inhibited disease compared to ruxolitinib monotherapy, including extending survival. Given SHP2 inhibitors are undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with solid tumors, our preclinical findings suggest that SHP2 is a candidate therapeutic target with potential for rapid translation to clinical assessment to improve current targeted therapies for MPN patients.

Rusfertide Improves Responses in Phlebotomy-Dependent Polycythemia Vera

Posted on March 11, 2024March 11, 2024 by mpn_admin

March 7, 2024

Caroline Seymour

Patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera, a type of myeloproliferative neoplasm, treated with rusfertide experienced a response rate of 60% (n = 18/30) compared with 17% (n = 5/29) in those who received placebo (P = .002), according to updated findings from part 2 of the phase 2 REVIVE trial (NCT04057040) published in the New England Journal of Medicine.¹

The international trial was designed with 3 parts: a 28-week, open-label, dose-finding portion in which rusfertide was added to a patient’s ongoing therapy of phlebotomy alone or cytoreductive therapy with optional phlebotomy; a double-blind, randomized withdrawal portion wherein patients were randomly assigned to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks (weeks 29 to 41); and an open-label extension period following patients on rusfertide therapy for up to 3 years.

Findings from part 1 showed that the estimated mean number of annual phlebotomies was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). Moreover, the mean maximum hematocrit level was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 vs 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. Patient quality of life was also improved on rusfertide, with a lower severity of disease-related symptoms.

“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating [patients with] polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, an associate professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology) at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York, and lead author of the study, stated in a news release.² “Pending further clinical studies, this injectable agent could become a valuable therapeutic tool for a disease which many patients and their physicians struggle to bring under control.”

Years After Genetic Finding, Drugs Targeting CALR-Mutant Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Enter Trials

Posted on March 4, 2024March 4, 2024 by mpn_admin

Feb 29, 2024 | Catherine Shaffer

NEW YORK – More than a decade after mutations in the CALR gene were first linked to the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms, CALR-targeted drug candidates are advancing to Phase I clinical trials.

If these drugs reach the market, they could provide a treatment option for a group of patients with myelofibrosis and essential thrombocythemia who typically must wait until their condition turns serious to attempt a risky stem cell transplant.

About 300,000 patients in the US have myeloproliferative neoplasms. Kapila Vigas, CEO of the MPN Research Foundation, said patients can have very different presentations of the disease, and it can take “years or decades” to get a diagnosis. Although myeloproliferative neoplasms are classified as chronic cancers that patients can live with for many years with blood count monitoring, Vigas said some patients can abruptly progress, and their condition can become serious.

“That uncertainty is really concerning to patients,” Vigas said. “We think from a psychosocial perspective, it’s worse than an acute cancer because while cancer may be more serious, it’s predictable, and there’s a plan and a protocol, whereas when you’re diagnosed with [a myeloproliferative neoplasm] watch and wait is almost a first-line approach. It just adds to the anxiety.”