Myeloproliferative neoplasms in the adolescent and young adult population: A comprehensive review of the literature

Posted on by

Hannah Goulart, Lucia Masarova, Ruben Mesa, Claire Harrison, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Naveen Pemmaraju 

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are characterized by a clonal proliferation of myeloid lineage cells within the bone marrow. The classical BCR-ABL negative MPNs are comprised of polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and primary myelofibrosis. Historically, the majority of MPNs are diagnosed in adults older than 60 years of age; however, in recent years, there has been recognition of MPNs in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population. AYAs with MPN, typically defined as between the ages of 15 and 39 years old, may comprise up to 20% of patients diagnosed with MPN. They demonstrate unique patterns of driver mutations and thrombotic events and remain at risk for progression to more aggressive disease states. Given the likely long length of time they will live with their disease, there is a significant unmet need in identifying well-tolerated and effective treatment options for these patients, particularly with the advent of disease modification. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features, disease course and management of AYA patients with MPN and, in doing so, highlight key characteristics that distinguish them from their older counterparts.

Read more

Platelet proteome reveals potential mediators of immunothrombosis and proteostasis in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

Sarah Kelliher, Sara Gamba, Luisa Weiss, Zhu Shen, Marina Marchetti, Francesca Schieppati, Caitriona Scaife, Stephen Madden, Kathleen Bennett, Anne Fortune, Su Maung, Michael Fay, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Patricia Maguire, Anna Falanga, Barry Kevane, and Anandi Krishnan

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are chronic bone marrow malignancies characterised by clonal proliferation of hematopoietic precursors and elevated cell counts in peripheral blood. Patients with MPN are at risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia and experience a substantial burden of
microvascular symptoms. However, thrombosis ( both arterial and venous), represents the leading
cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with PV and ET.

Translational studies have indicated that the platelet proteome influences pathways relating to immune
response, inflammation, and malignancy. Thrombocytosis and platelet hyperactivity are hallmarks of
MPN, however platelet count in isolation is not predictive of clinical outcome, and conventional
antiplatelet therapy does not fully mitigate thrombotic risk. A comprehensive picture of the MPN platelet
molecular profile is lacking and to date, no studies have evaluated the unbiased platelet proteome in a
sizeable clinical cohort of affected patients. In this present study, we performed untargeted quantitative
profiling of the platelet proteome in a large (n= 140) cohort of patients with PV and ET.

Read more

Dr Kishtagari on JAK Inhibitor Selection for Myelofibrosis in the Community Setting

Posted on by

John Mascarenhas, MD

John Mascarenhas, MD, professor, medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, director, Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, member, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, discusses phase 3 of the SENTRY (NCT04562389) trial, a global, multicenter, phase 1/3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) when given in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.

The study is being conducted in 2 phases. In phase 1, the open-label portion of the study, enrollment has been completed and the safety and recommended dose of selinexor plus ruxolitinib was studied. Phase 1a utilized a standard 3+3 design, and phase 1b was the dose-expansion part. Phase 3 of the trial is enrolling patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis and randomizing them 2:1 to receive the combination therapy of selinexor with ruxolitinib or placebo with ruxolitinib.

In phase 3, the primary end points are the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of greater than or equal to 35% at week 24, and the proportion of patients with a total symptom score reduction of greater than or equal to 50% at week 24, as measured by the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form V4.0.

Read more

Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis

Posted on by

By: Aaron Gerds, Claire Harrison, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Ruben Mesa, Alessandro Vannucchi, Rami Komrokji, Prithviaj Bose, Marina Kremyanskaya, Adam Mead, Jason Gotlib, Shelonitda Rose, Fabian Sanabria, Niloufar Marsousi, Ana Giuseppi, Huijing Jiang, Jeanne Palmer , Kelly McCaul, Vincent Ribrag, Francesco Passamonti

Abstract:
The ACE-536-MF-001 trial enrolled patients with myelofibrosis (n = 95) into 4 cohorts: patients in
cohorts 1 and 3A were non-transfusion dependent (NTD) and had anemia; patients in cohorts 2 and 3B
were transfusion dependent (TD); patients in cohort 3A/3B had stable ruxolitinib treatment prior to
and during the study. All patients received luspatercept (1.0-1.75 mg/kg, 21-day cycles). Treatment
was extended if clinical benefit was observed at day 169. The primary endpoint was anemia response
rate (NTD, {greater than or equal to}1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline; TD, transfusionindependence) over any 12-week period during the primary treatment period (weeks 1-24). Overall, 14% of patients in cohorts 1 and 3A, 10% in cohort 2, and 26% in cohort 3B met the primary
endpoint. In cohorts 1 and 3A (NTD), 27% and 50% of patients respectively had mean hemoglobin
increase {greater than or equal to}1.5 g/dL from baseline. Among TD patients, ~50% had {greater
than or equal to}50% reduction in transfusion burden. Reduction in total symptom score was observed
in all cohorts, with the greatest response rate seen in cohort 3A. Overall, 94% of patients had
{greater than or equal to}1 adverse event (AE); 47% had {greater than or equal to}1 treatmentrelated AE (TRAE; 11% grade {greater than or equal to}3), most frequently hypertension (18%),
managed with medical intervention. One patient had a serious TRAE leading to luspatercept
discontinuation. Nine patients died on treatment (unrelated to study drug). In most patients,
ruxolitinib dose and spleen size remained stable. In patients with myelofibrosis, luspatercept
improved anemia and transfusion burden across cohorts.

Read more

Pelabresib Plus Ruxolitinib Significantly Reduces Splenomegaly in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Kristi Rosa

Pelabresib (CPI-0610) plus ruxolitinib (Jakafi) significantly reduced splenomegaly, showed a trend toward a reduction in tumor symptom score (TSS) from baseline, and improved bone marrow fibrosis and anemia at week 24 compared with ruxolitinib alone in JAK inhibitor–naive patients with myelofibrosis, according to updated data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 study (NCT04603495) presented at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting.1

As previously presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, the trial met its primary end point when a higher percentage of those who received the doublet (n = 214) experienced a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at week 24 vs those given ruxolitinib alone (n = 216), at 65.9% and 35.2%, respectively (difference, 30.4; 95% CI, 21.6-39.3; P < .001).2 The mean percentage change in spleen volume at week 24 in the pelabresib/ruxolitinib arm was -50.6% (95% CI, -53.2% to -48.0%) vs -30.6% (95% CI, -33.7% to -27.5%) in the ruxolitinib-alone arm.

When looking at all responders who achieved SVR35 response, the proportion who lost response at any point in the pelabresib/ruxolitinib arm was 13.4% and more than double in the ruxolitinib-alone arm, at 27.8%. When examining the criteria of loss of SVR35 response plus a spleen volume increase greater than 25% from nadir, this occurred in 9.3% and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Notably, SVR35 response was consistently higher with the doublet vs the monotherapy across all predefined subgroups and across hematologic subgroups.

Read more

Cytopenias/Proliferation Define Outcomes for Patients With Primary MF and MF from Essential Thrombocythemia or PV

Posted on by

Amber Denham

05/31/2024

According to research presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, cytopenias and/or proliferation, rather than JAK2V617F (JAK2) allele burden </≥50%, correlate with the outcomes of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and patients with MF from essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera (PPV/PET-MF). In addition, all patients were noted to display improved survival with ruxolitinib treatment.

Myelodepleted MF, which is characterized by cytopenias, lower JAK2 allele burden, and shorter benefit from JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib, exhibits worse overall survival (OS) compared to myeloproliferative MF. In addition, lower JAK2 and inferior OS is generally more typical for patients with primary MF (PMF) as compared with patients with MF from essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera (PPV/PET-MF).

“We sought to investigate the impact of JAK2 (</≥ 50%), cytopenias and the use of ruxolitinib in outcome of PMF/PPV-PET-MF patients from our center,” explained Julie Braish, MBBCh, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas and colleagues.

To determine these results, study authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 601 patients with JAK2-mutated MF (known JAK2%). Patients were divided based on the absence (-) or presence (+) of cytopenias (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL or platelets < 100 x109/L) and leukocytosis (WBC ≥ 25 x109/L) into: grade 1 = (-)/(-) [absence of both]; grade 2 = (-)/(+) [proliferative]; grade 3 = (+)/(-) [cytopenic]; grade 4 = (+)/(+) [cytopenic and proliferative]) and evaluated overall survival (OS) per JAK2 </≥ 50% and PMF vs PPV/PET-MF. Investigators assessed the tolerance of ruxolitinib ≥3 years by utilizing descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier curve with log-rank test and regression analysis for demographics, estimation of OS and its comparison.

Read more

Dr Gerds on Updated Data for Pelabresib Plus Ruxolitinib in JAK Inhibitior–Naive Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Author(s): Aaron Gerds, MD

May 31, 2024

Aaron Gerds, MD, assistant professor in medicine, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, discusses updated efficacy and safety results from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) of pelabresib (CPI-0610) plusruxolitinib (Jakafi) in patients with JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis.

Previously reported data from the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, showed that the combination of pelabresib and ruxolitinib produced a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in spleen volume reduction of at least 35% (SVR35) from baseline vs placebo plus ruxolitinib in patients with treatment-naive disease.

At the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting, Gerds and colleagues reported data reaffirming these initial topline results, emphasizing their consistency over time. Among patients who achieved SVR35, 13.4% in the combination arm lost their splenic response compared with 27.8% of patients treated in the placebo arm.

Notably, the proportion of patients achieving both SVR35 and a reduction in tumor symptom score of at least 50% (TSS50) was also evaluated, Gerds states. In the combination therapy group, 40.2% of patients achieved both end points vs 18.5% with ruxolitinib alone, he reports. Gerds posits that the difference in rates of TSS50 may not be as pronounced between the combination therapy and ruxolitinib alone because single-agent ruxolitinib is highly effective in reducing symptoms; however, the higher proportion of patients achieving both end points with the combination therapy is noteworthy, he explains.

Read more

Updated MANIFEST-2 Data With Pelabresib/Ruxolitinib Support Paradigm Shift in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Author(s): Kristi Rosa

May 31, 2024

The addition of pelabresib (CPI-0610) and ruxolitinib (Jakafi) led to a significant and durable reduction in splenomegaly, showed a trend toward reduced tumor symptom score (TSS) from baseline, and improved anemia and bone marrow fibrosis at week 24 vs ruxolitinib alone in JAK inhibitor–naive patients with myelofibrosis, according to updated data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 study (NCT04603495) presented at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting.1

As previously presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting, the trial met its primary end point when a higher percentage of those who received the doublet (n = 214) experienced a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at week 24 vs those given ruxolitinib alone (n = 216), at 65.9% and 35.2%, respectively (difference, 30.4; 95% CI, 21.6-39.3; P < .001).2 The mean percentage change in spleen volume at week 24 in the pelabresib/ruxolitinib arm was -50.6% (95% CI, -53.2% to -48.0%) vs -30.6% (95% CI, -33.7% to -27.5%) in the ruxolitinib-alone arm.

When looking at all responders who achieved SVR35 response, the proportion who lost response at any point in the pelabresib/ruxolitinib arm was 13.4% and more than double in the ruxolitinib-alone arm, at 27.8%. When examining the criteria of loss of SVR35 response plus a spleen volume increase greater than 25% from nadir, this occurred in 9.3% and 14.8% of patients, respectively. Notably, SVR35 response was consistently higher with the doublet vs the monotherapy across all predefined subgroups and across hematologic subgroups.

A strong trend for numerical decrease in absolute change in TSS from baseline at week 24 was observed with the doublet vs the monotherapy, at -15.99 and -14.05, translating to a mean difference of -1.94 points (95% CI, -3.92 to 0.04; P = .0545). A higher proportion of patients who received the combination vs ruxolitinib alone achieved a 50% reduction in TSS (TSS50), at 52.3% vs 46.3% (difference, 6.0; 95% CI, -3.5 to 15.5; P = .216); this difference did not reach statistical significance. A two-fold increase in patients who achieved both SVR35 and TSS50 responses was observed with pelabresib plus ruxolitinib vs ruxolitinib alone, at 40.2% and 18.5%, respectively.

Read more

Azacitidine Plus Ruxolitinib Demonstrates ‘Promising’ Efficacy in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Amber Denham

05/31/2024

Azacitidine in combination with ruxolitinib demonstrates promising efficacy for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), according to long-term follow-up results from a phase 2 clinical trial presented at the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual meeting.

The trial included adult patients aged ≥18 years with MF intermediate 1 to 2 or high-risk disease, measured by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). From March 2013 to October 2021, a total of 61 patients were treated in the trial. Patients had a median age of 66 years (46 to 87). The median hemoglobin was 10.1 g/dl (6.8 to 16.2) and bone marrow blasts 2% (0 to 14%). Overall, 14 (23%) patients had BM blasts ≥5%. Furthermore, JAK2 was mutated in 35 (57%) patients and 38 (62%) patients had intermediate-2 or high-risk DIPSS disease.

Study results showed an International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) response occurred in 44 (72%) patients. A clinical improvement was noted in 37 (61%) patients, including IWG-MRT spleen reduction >50% in 28 (61%) of 46 patients with baseline length ≥5 cm below left costal margin, and 31 (61%) of 51 patients with baseline total symptom score (TSS) >12 having a >50% improvement in TSS 50. In addition, a partial response was seen in 4 patients and cytogenetic complete remission in 3 patients.

With a median follow-up of 93 months, median overall survival (OS) was 46 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 25 to 66), median event-free survival was 33 months (95% CI, 24 to 43), and median duration of any objective response was 43 months (95% CI, 24 to 62). It was noted that disease transformation to AML occurred in 14 (23%) patients with a median time to transformation of 19 months. In addition, 20 (33%) patients received a stem cell transplant (SCT), and 11 (55%) patients had intermediate-2/high-risk DIPPS disease. It was observed that patients in the Intermediate-2/high-risk DIPPS group who received a SCT showed a trend towards improved median OS vs those who did not receive a transplant (38 vs 27 months, P = .2).

Read more

Advances in Interferon Therapy for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Posted on by

Kumar Das, Dibash PhD

Oncology Times 46(6):p 1,14, June 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/01.COT.0001024068.38723.15

In the ever-evolving landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), clinicians continue to explore and refine treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes. A recent review published in Therapeutic Advances in Hematology sheds light on the pivotal role of interferons, particularly pegylated formulations, in managing MPNs effectively (2024; doi: 10.1177/20406207241229588).

The advent of pegylated interferons, including peginterferon alfa-2a and ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, marks a significant turning point in MPN therapeutics. These agents, renowned for their potent immunomodulatory capabilities and profound impact on disease progression, have reshaped treatment paradigms outlined in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines for polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. This article delves deep into the multifaceted influence of pegylated interferons, shedding light on their efficacy, safety profiles, and future implications in MPN management.

Clinical trials, including landmark Phase II and III studies such as MPD-RC 111 and MPD-RC 112, have provided crucial insights into the efficacy of pegylated interferons. These trials meticulously assessed response rates, molecular remissions, and hematological improvements in MPN patients resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Noteworthy reductions in JAK2 V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) have underscored the molecular response achievements of pegylated interferons, highlighting their disease-modifying potential.

Read more