Comparison of recognition of symptom burden in MPN between patient- and physician-reported assessment – an intraindividual analysis by the German Study Group for MPN (GSG-MPN)

Kirsi Manz, Florian H. Heidel, Steffen Koschmieder, Rudolf Schlag, Jörg Lipke, Frank Stegelmann, Martin Griesshammer, Martine Klausmann, Carl Crodel, Andreas Hochhaus, Holger Schulz, Joachim R. Göthert, Haifa Al-Ali, Heiko Becker, Andreas Reiter, Gernot Beutel, Kim Kricheldorf, Tim H. Brümmendorf, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Konstanze Döhner & Susanne Isfort On behalf of the German Study Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GSG-MPN)

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with a variety of symptoms that severely impact patients’ quality of life and ability to perform daily activities. Recent studies showed differences in the perception of physician- versus patient-reported symptom burden. However, studies directly comparing patient- and physician-reported ratings are lacking. Here, a retrospective analysis on symptom burden of 3979 MPN patients of the Bioregistry of the German Study Group for MPN was conducted to intra-individually compare physician and patient reports collected at the same time. Cohen’s kappa was calculated to assess the degree of agreement between patient and physician reports. Factors influencing baseline symptom severity were identified using linear regression and adjusted Cox models were calculated to investigate the effect of symptom burden on survival. MPN patients had a high symptom burden, which neither decreased over time nor upon cytoreductive therapy. All symptoms were more frequently reported by patients compared to physicians. Agreement remained low and only slightly improved when considering a higher threshold for patient symptom severity. Patients with severe symptom burden had inferior survival compared to patients with less severe symptoms. Assessment of symptom burden in MPN is therefore insufficient and patient-reported outcome tools need to be implemented into clinical routine.

Read more

Divesiran Is Tolerable and Shows Positive Early Signals in Polycythemia Vera

February 26, 2025

Author(s): Kyle Doherty

Fact checked by: Megan Hollasch

Divesiran (SLN124), a novel small interfering RNA (siRNA), was safe and displayed signals of efficacy in the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera, according to findings from the phase 1/2 SANRECO trial (NCT05499013).1

Initial results from SANRECO presented during the 2024 ASH Annual Meeting showed that divesiran reduced phlebotomy frequency in patients (n = 21). A total of 79 phlebotomies occurred across all patients prior to dosing; there were 5 phlebotomies during the treatment period and 2 during follow-up among all patients. Divesiran also induced hepcidin in all patients and decreased hematocrit in all cohorts of patients treated.

Additionally, patients did not experience any dose-limiting toxicities. Most treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were grade 1 in severity (84%) and there were no TEAEs above grade 2 reported. There were also no treatment-related serious AEs or TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation.

Divesiran is a first-in-class GalNAc-conjugated siRNA that targets TMPRSS6, a negative regulator of the HJV/BMP/SMAD signaling pathway that induces hepcidin expression. The agent is designed to have a long duration of action, and, notably, it’s target sequence is unique to TMPRSS6 and was selected to maximize TMPRSS6 knock down. Investigators hypothesized that inhibiting TMPRSS6 would raise hepcidin levels and lower iron delivery to the bone marrow, leading to reduced erythropoiesis.

Read more

Management of Bleeding, Thrombotic and Pregnancy-Related Complications in Women with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Case-Based Review Focusing on Sex-Specific Challenges

February 25, 2025

by Thita Chiasakul and Ross I. Baker

Abstract

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic disorders that pose unique challenges in women, particularly regarding thrombosis, bleeding, fertility, and pregnancy. Women with MPN exhibit distinct thrombotic and sometimes contradictory bleeding profiles, including a higher prevalence of unusual thrombosis such as cerebral and splanchnic vein thrombosis and increased risk of hemorrhage from anti-thrombotic medication, acquired von Willebrand syndrome and platelet dysfunction. Estrogen-containing contraceptives should generally be avoided due to thrombotic risk. Around 10–20% of newly diagnosed MPN cases are women of childbearing age and the number is increasing annually. MPN patients when compared to controls have a lower rate of live birth rate of 71% vs. 80% with a hazard ratio of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.68–0.90), and increased preterm birth (14% vs. 4%), low birth weight (<2500 g, 10% vs. 4%), and increased cesarean section rate (32% vs. 17%). Management of MPN-related pregnancy requires specific considerations regarding the prevention of thrombosis, bleeding, and pregnancy-related complications. Management strategies during pregnancy include low-dose aspirin and consideration of low-molecular-weight heparin and interferon. Despite these challenges, most women with MPN can achieve successful pregnancies with optimized care. In this case-based review, we present two cases that illustrate key aspects of managing MPN in women, summarize the current literature, and propose a diagnostic and management framework tailored to these complexities.

Fedratinib Shows Safety, Potential as Post-Transplant Therapy in MPNs

February 21, 2025

Fedratinib (Inrebic) as a maintenance therapy following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant given at a 400 mg daily dose was determined to be safe and established as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Findings come from a recent phase 1 trial where experts explored the potential of fedratinib, a JAK2 inhibitor already approved for pre-transplant myelofibrosis, as a post-transplant maintenance therapy to reduce relapse risk and mitigate graft-vs-host disease (GVHD).

In an interview with Targeted OncologyTM, Hany Elmariah, MD, associate member at the Moffitt Cancer Center in the department of bone marrow transplant and cellular immunotherapy, discussed the trial’s findings, the safety profile of fedratinib, and its evolving role in the post-transplant setting.

Targeted Oncology: Could you discuss the background of this study and what motivated the research?

Elmariah: One of my areas of research is transplant for myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative neoplasms. While transplant can be curative, the cure rate, depending on the study, is generally in the 40% to 60% range. The main reason patients are not cured by transplant is largely the risk of relapse, which [occurs when] the cancer returns after the transplant. For those who do not relapse, there is also the risk of toxicity, such as GVHD, where the transplant attacks the patient’s own body. There are many strategies in development, both for myelofibrosis and other cancers, to reduce the risks of relapse and GVHD.

Read more

Spotlight on amino acid changing mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway: from disease-specific mutation to general mutation databases

February 20, 2025

Markus Hoffmann & Lothar Hennighausen

Abstract

The JAK-STAT pathway is central to cytokine signaling and controls normal physiology and disease. Aberrant activation via mutations that change amino acids in proteins of the pathway can result in diseases. While disease-centric databases like COSMIC catalog mutations in cancer, their prevalence in healthy populations remains underexplored. We systematically studied such mutations in the JAK-STAT genes by comparing COSMIC and the population-focused All of Us database. Our analysis revealed frequent mutations in all JAK and STAT domains, particularly among white females. We further identified three categories: Mutations uniquely found in All of Us that were associated with cancer in the literature but could not be found in COSMIC, underscoring COSMIC’s limitations. Mutations unique to COSMIC underline their potential as drivers of cancer due to their absence in the general population. Mutations present in both databases, e.g., JAK2Val617Phe/V617F – widely recognized as a cancer driver in hematopoietic cells, but without disease associations in All of Us, raising the possibility that combinatorial SNPs might be responsible for disease development. These findings illustrate the complementarity of both databases for understanding mutation impacts and underscore the need for multi-mutation analyses to uncover genetic factors underlying complex diseases and advance personalized medicine.

Read more

Fedratinib in 2025 and Beyond: Indications and Future Applications

Alexander Coltoff (Medical University of South Carolina, United States) John Mascarenhas (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States)

Abstract

Dysregulated JAK/STAT signaling underlies the pathogenesis of myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by cytopenias, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. JAK inhibitors, such as fedratinib, are the primary therapeutic option for patients with high-risk or symptomatic myelofibrosis. Fedratinib has characteristics that distinguish it from the other commercially available JAK inhibitors, such as its preferential inhibition of JAK2 and its inhibitory effects on kinases such as FLT3 and BRD4. Fedratinib is most often used in the second-line setting after intolerance or resistance to other JAK inhibitors, but there is substantial evidence that it is an effective first-line option in the appropriate patient population. Prevention and early treatment of fedratinib-related gastrointestinal toxicity is key to maintaining adequate drug exposure, and clinicians must remain vigilant for Wernicke encephalopathy during treatment. Fedratinib’s JAK2 selectivity and kinome profile make it an appealing agent for alternative indications, such as myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms and maintenance after bone marrow transplantation, which are under active investigation.

Read more

4 Ways Polycythemia Vera Can Affect Your Quality of Life — and What You Can Do About It

Just like any chronic health condition, polycythemia vera (PV) can have a negative impact on your everyday life. Research has shown that PV is associated with a lower quality of life in measures, including health, cognitive, emotional, and physical functioning.

Symptoms such as fatigue, itchy skin, and mental health issues can make it difficult to function, but they can be managed. “This is a chronic condition that people can live with,” says Jacqueline S. Garcia, MD, a medical oncologist at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

Here are some common challenges of living with PV and ways to cope, so you can stay healthy and live well as you manage this condition.

1. Fatigue Can Interfere With Daily Activities

Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms of PV. “Polycythemia vera is a blood disorder that stems from an error in the bone marrow,” says Dr. Garcia. As a result, bone marrow overproduces red blood cells, causing the body to use up your iron supply. This results in iron deficiency, which leads to fatigue, she explains.
Another factor that can contribute to fatigue is phlebotomy treatment, which is a procedure that involves drawing blood to reduce blood cells and blood volume. A common side effect of this treatment is increased fatigue and iron deficiency, according to Garcia.

The degree of fatigue can vary from one person to another and depend on age, menopausal status, other health conditions — such as cardiovascular disease or diabetes — and more factors, says Garcia.

What to do about it: When it comes to polycythemia vera fatigue, research found that fatigue was a bigger problem for people who had a higher BMI, continued to drink alcohol or use tobacco, and didn’t exercise.

Maintaining healthy lifestyle habits may help you feel more energized every day. For instance, Garcia recommends exercising in moderation, as long as you have your doctor’s okay and don’t push yourself if you feel faint.

Read more

Ruxolitinib Plus SOC Prophylaxis Is Associated With Lower Rates of GVHD in Myelofibrosis

February 14, 2025

Author(s): Dylann Cohn-Emery

Fact checked by: Jonah Feldman

Treatment with the combination of ruxolitinib (Jakafi) and standard-of-care graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis led to a reduction in the rates of acute and chronic GVHD without compromising survival rates in patients with myelofibrosis undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), according to data from a phase 2 prospective study (NCT04384692) presented at the 2025 Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Meetings.1

The study conducted at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center showed grade II to IV acute GVHD occurred in 32% of patients receiving peri-transplant ruxolitinib, whereas it occurred in 71% in a pre-transplant ruxolitinib group of a similar preliminary study. The percentage of patients with chronic GVHD at 1 year with peri-transplant ruxolitinib 12%, whereas it was 25% with pre-transplant ruxolitinib. These rates of GVHD also coincided with high overall survival (OS) rates at year 1 and 2 of 100% and 87%, respectively, in the peri-transplant ruxolitinib trial.

“The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was markedly reduced without the expense of non-relapse mortality, relapse, or survival. It doesn’t appear that infections or transfusion needs were increased,” Rachel B. Salit, MD, associate professor at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, said in her presentation.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors prevent activation of the JAK domain by binding to the kinase, in turn preventing STAT phosphorylation and translocation of the nucleus. This process reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. GVHD pathogenesis has shown to be affected by the JAK-STAT pathway, and JAK signaling is key in the process leading to tissue damage and inflammation.

In previous trials of ruxolitinib, such as COMFORT-I (NCT00952289) and COMFORT-II (NCT00934544), this JAK inhibition showed significantly better results in reducing symptoms and splenomegaly compared with best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis. Additionally, the REACH1 (NCT02953678), REACH2 (NCT02913261), and REACH3 (NCT03112603) trials demonstrated significantly improved response with ruxolitinib vs best available therapy when treating patients with acute and chronic GVHD.

The preliminary study (NCT02251821) of ruxolitinib pre-transplant showed improved survival in this patient population. With a median time of 7 months on ruxolitinib, 38% of patients had more than a 10% decrease in spleen size and 36% were stable. In patients with symptoms prior to ruxolitinib, 55% had stable or improved symptoms by the time of HCT.

Read more

High Levels of C5a Are Associated With Reduced Macular Sensitivity in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

February 2025

Kathrine GotfredsenAndreas Abou-TahaCharlotte LiisborgMarie Krogh NielsenMorten Kranker LarsenVibe SkovLasse KjærHans Karl HasselbalchTorben Lykke Sørensen

Abstract

Purpose: Previous findings indicate that patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) exhibit elevated levels of inflammatory biomarkers and have a high prevalence of AMD. In this study, we aim to determine whether drusen and systemic inflammation in patients with MPN affect macular sensitivity in the same manner as in patients with AMD.

Methods: The study was conducted as a prospective cross-sectional study. A total of 139 study eyes of 71 patients were included in this study. We measured macular sensitivity using microperimetry and extracted blood samples to evaluate systemic inflammation markers.

Results: Multilevel linear mixed-effect analysis did not show any difference in macular sensitivity when comparing eyes of MPN patients with AMD to those without drusen (β = −0.254, P = 0.657). However, higher levels of the complement system fragment C5a were significantly correlated with decreased total macular sensitivity (β = −0.561, P = 0.027), irrespective of the presence of drusen.

Conclusions: We found that high levels of the systemic inflammation marker C5a are associated with reduced macular sensitivity, regardless of the presence of visible degenerative changes in the macular area. These findings suggest an early contribution of the complement system to macular sensitivity.

Read more

 

Getting Closer to Disease Modification in Polycythemia Vera

February 2025 Vol 11 No 1

Dr. Lucia Masarova

Polycythemia vera was first recognized by French physician Louis H. Vaquez in 1892 and was known then as maladie de Vaquez.1 The name poly-cyt-[h]emia originates from the Greek and Latin, and literally means many-cells-in the blood. In 1951, Dr. William Dameshek included polycythemia vera in the category of classic Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative disorders (now classified as myeloproliferative neoplasms, MPNs; myelo refers to the bone marrowproliferative refers to rapid growth of blood cells, and neoplasm describes abnormal and excessive growth). It is the only one among the 3 classic MPNs that exhibits erythrocytosis, the increased production of red blood cells. Polycythemia vera is a condition associated with overproduction of all blood cells, including white cells and platelets.

Polycythemia vera is a chronic, incurable disease of the hematopoietic stem cells, the primary cells that can develop into different types of blood cells and are responsible for the production of blood cells during a human’s entire life. It is a clonal disease, meaning it occurs when a mutated hematopoietic stem cell starts making clones—cells with the same genetic mutation. Most affected patients can live a relatively normal and long life.

A breakthrough discovery of a genetic “driver” of polycythemia vera was made in 2005—a mutation in the JAK2 gene was found in 95% of cases, typically JAK2V617F, a mutation that leads to the constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT protein pathway causing unregulated overproduction of hematopoietic cells. This discovery led to improved understanding of the biology, pathogenesis, and long-term behavior of the disease and initiated numerous efforts to develop novel therapies focused on the inhibition of the JAK-STAT pathway.

The abnormal function of the immune system and the subsequent increased inflammation, powerfully driven by the JAK-STAT pathway as the major regulator of inflammatory signaling, contribute to disease progression and an impaired quality of life. Despite the relatively slow progression of the disease course in most patients, the disease possesses its challenges and risks, including a lifetime risk of developing thrombosis (blood clots); the evolution into myelofibrosis, a chronic type of leukemia; or development into acute leukemia. Both blood clots and leukemia are consequences that can shorten life expectancy significantly.

Read more