Real World Management of Cytopenias and Infections in Patients With Myelofibrosis Treated With Ruxolitinib

Posted on by

Liesl A. Butler, Cecily Forsyth, Claire Harrison, Andrew C. Perkins

ABSTRACT
Introduction: Ruxolitinib was the first JAK2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of primary and secondary myelofibrosis. It is
currently used worldwide as first-line therapy for advanced disease (intermediate-2 and high-risk) and is effective in polycythaemia
vera (PV) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET), but not funded for this indication in many countries. Ruxolitinib has proven
benefits with respect to symptom control, reduction in spleen size and prolongation of survival; however, it rarely induces a
substantial reduction in allele burden and never provides a cure. Moreover, there are frequently encountered adverse effects and
dosing issues that require careful management to optimise its therapeutic benefit.

Methods and Results: In this case-based review, we use seven informative common clinical scenarios to discuss appropriate
investigation and management of cytopenias and infection issues.

Conclusions: We make recommendations based on 15 years of experience in using ruxolitinib and other JAK inhibitors for the
treatment of myelofibrosis. We discuss when allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) should be considered
and some of the currently available alternative JAK inhibitors and trial options when AHSCT is not an option.

Read more

Emerging Therapies in Myelofibrosis Could Extend Beyond JAK Inhibitors

Posted on by

March 24, 2025

Author(s): Ashley Chan

Fact checked by: Ashling Wahner

The September 2023 FDA approval of momelotinib (Ojjaara) for the treatment of patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis with anemia provided the treatment paradigm with its fourth FDA-approved JAK inhibitor, a class of drugs that has helped improve symptoms associated with myelofibrosis and decrease spleen size, according to Raajit Rampal, MD, PhD.

Additional classes of drugs, such as BET inhibitors and immunotherapy agents, are also currently under investigation in clinical trials and could become “game-changers” if effective, Rampal noted.

“The major [message is] that myelofibrosis is not a monolithic disease, and the selection of the treatment needs to be tailored to the underlying issues and challenges the patient is facing,” said Rampal in an interview with OncLive®.

In the interview, Rampal discussed currently available JAK inhibitors and their limitations, emerging treatments for myelofibrosis, tips for treatment selection, and his takeaways from the 6th Annual Miami Cancer Institute Global Summit on Immunotherapies for Hematologic Malignancies.

Rampal is a hematologist-oncologist, the director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies, and the director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York.

Read more

Association of Pruritus With Comorbidities and Survival in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Posted on by

March 2025

J. Saucereau, Emilie Brenaut, Anne-Sophie Ficheux, L. Misery

Abstract

Background
Pruritus is a symptom frequently associated with systemic diseases, particularly hematological disorders.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of pruritus with morbidity in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
Methods
A systematic review of the literature was performed using two databases (Pubmed and Embase). Studies were included if they were published between January 2000 and August 2022 and addressed an association between pruritus and morbidity or survival in MPN patients.
Results
Ten articles were selected for the systematic review, 6 including patients with polycythemia vera (PV), 1 with essential thrombocythemia (ET), 2 with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and 1 including both ET and PV. While 2 studies found no significant association between pruritus and mortality, 2 studies found a significant association between pruritus and improved survival. Three studies reported a statistically significant association between pruritus and an increase in thromboembolic events, while one study did not. One study showed an association between the presence of pruritus and sleep disturbance in PV. One study demonstrated an association between pruritus and the presence of depressive symptoms in PV. Two studies found a significant association between disease progression and the presence of pruritus, while three studies did not.
Conclusions
While pruritus appears to influence sleep quality and the onset of depressive symptoms, the effect of pruritus on mortality is more controversial, but the presence of pruritus might be associated with better survival.
Read more

Dr Bhat on the Influence of MPN Risk Stratification on Treatment Decision-Making

Posted on by

March 20, 2025

Author(s): Seema A. Bhat, MD

Fact checked by: Ashling Wahner, Courtney Flaherty

Seema A. Bhat, MD, a hematologist at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center—James; as well as an assistant professor in the Department of Internal Medicine in the Division of Hematology at The Ohio State University, discusses the importance of risk stratification for navigating treatment selection for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

Stratifying patients with MPNs into appropriate risk groups is crucial for treatment decision-making, as patients’ individual risk factors strongly factor into selection, Bhat says. Typically, patients with low-risk disease will receive treatments directed at symptom management, whereas cytoreductive agents like hydroxyurea, as well as targeted therapies like JAK inhibitors, are considered for patients with high-risk disease, she explains. Furthermore, allogeneic stem cell transplantation may be a curative treatment option for patients with very high–risk MPNs, she notes.

The revised IPSET Thrombosis Score is used for essential thrombocythemia (ET) risk stratification. Patients are considered to have low-risk polycythemia vera (PV) if they are younger than 60 years of age and have no history of thrombosis; patients are considered to have high-risk PV if they are older than 60 years of age and/or have a thrombosis history.

Four JAK inhibitors are FDA approved for the treatment of patients with MPNs. Ruxolitinib (Jakafi) is indicated for adult patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis and secondary (post-PV or post-ET) myelofibrosis; as well as adult patients with PV who have had an inadequate response or are intolerant to hydroxyurea. Fedratinib (Inrebic) is approved for adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Pacritinib (Vonjo) is indicated for use in adult patients with intermediate- or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis with a platelet count below 50 × 109 /L. Finally, momelotinib (Ojjaara) is approved for adult patients with intermediate- or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis with anemia.

Read more

Safety and Efficacy of Busulphan Based on Dosing Patterns in the Real‐World Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Posted on by

March 2025

Ali Mahdi, Alexandros Rampotas, Patrick Roberts, Joanna Stokes

Abstract

Introduction
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), such as polycythaemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis (MF), are primarily treated by managing blood counts to reduce the thrombotic risk using cytoreductive agents. Busulphan, an oral alkylating agent, has been historically used for MPN management due to its myelosuppressive effects, but concerns about its risk of leukaemic transformation have limited its use.
Methods
This real‐world retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of busulphan in 115 MPN patients across 13 UK hospitals. Responses in patients with ET and PV only were assessed using European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria.
Results
With a median age of 78 years, the overall response rate was 78.1%, with 29% of PV and 18% of ET patients achieving complete responses. Dosing regimens were similarly distributed between repeated single doses of busulphan (31%), courses of treatment lasting 1–4 weeks (30%) and continuous therapy for more than 4 weeks (35%). No cases of disease progression to acute leukaemia or myelofibrosis were recorded during the median follow‐up of 23 months. Adverse events were infrequent, with fatigue and cytopaenia being the most common (4% each).
Conclusion
Busulphan demonstrated a favourable safety profile and is a viable cytoreductive option, particularly for elderly patients who are intolerant to hydroxycarbamide.

Understanding Hematocrit Thresholds in Polycythemia Vera Treatment

Posted on by

March 19, 2025

Author(s): Maggie L. Shaw, Andrew Kuykendall, MD

In early March, The American Journal of Managed Care® spoke with Andrew Kuykendall, MD, a clinical researcher at Moffitt Cancer Center who focuses on myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), myelodysplastic syndrome/MPN overlap syndromes, and systemic mastocytosis. Kuykendall is an investigator on the phase 3 VERIFY trial (NCT05210790) of the injectable hepcidin mimetic rusfertide (Takeda) to treat polycythemia vera (PV) by enabling patients to achieve and sustain hematocrit control.1 Hematocrit is the measure of the percentage of red blood cells in the body.2

Treatment guidelines in PV currently recommend maintaining hematocrit below 45%, with a higher threshold for men vs women.2 For part 2 of this interview, Kuykendall explains the reasoning behind having different hematocrit thresholds.

In the first part of the interview, Kuykendall discussed how PV manifests and common ways to reduce its negative impact on patient quality of life.

Read more

Optimizing Myelofibrosis Care in the Age of JAK Inhibitors

Posted on by

Author: Douglas Tremblay, MD

How do you assess a patient’s prognosis at the time that they are diagnosed with myelofibrosis?
In the clinic, we use several scoring systems that have been developed based on the outcomes of hundreds of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to try to predict survival from time of diagnosis. Disease features associated with a poor prognosis include anemia, elevated white blood cell count, advanced age, constitutional symptoms, and increased peripheral blasts. Some of these scoring systems also incorporate chromosomal abnormalities as well as gene mutations to further refine prognostication.1

Determining prognosis can be important to creating a treatment plan, particularly to decide if curative allogeneic stem cell transplantation is necessary. However, I always caution patients that these prognostic scoring systems cannot tell the future and that each patient may respond differently to treatment.

How do you monitor for disease progression?
I will discuss with patients how they are feeling in order to determine if there are any new or developing symptoms that could be a sign that their disease is progressing. I will also review their laboratory work looking for changes in blood counts that could be a signal of disease evolution.

For instance, development of anemia or thrombocytopenia may signal worsening bone marrow function or progression to secondary acute leukemia. If there are concerning signs or symptoms, I will then perform a bone marrow biopsy with aspirate that will include assessment of mutations and chromosomal abnormalities to determine if their disease is progressing.

What are the first-line treatment options for a patient newly diagnosed with myelofibrosis, and how do you determine the best course of action?
For patients with myelofibrosis, the first-line treatment options include Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, which are effective at improving spleen size and reducing symptom burden. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 4 JAK inhibitors for the treatment of myelofibrosis: ruxolitinib, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib (Table).2-13 In general, ruxolitinib is the first-line treatment option unless there is thrombocytopenia, in which case pacritinib is more appropriate. In patients with baseline anemia, momelotinib may be the best choice.

Read more

Pelabresib Plus Ruxolitinib Improves Spleen Responses in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

By Roman Fabbricatore
Fact checked by Russ Conroy

Pelabresib (CPI 0610) in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) significantly improved spleen responses and elicited robust clinical activity compared with placebo/ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis, according to results from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) published in Nature Medicine.1

Efficacy data from the trial revealed that the primary end point of spleen volume reduction of at least 35% at week 24 favored the investigational combination vs the placebo arm: 65.9% vs 35.2%, respectively (difference, 30.4%; 95% CI, 21.6%-39.3%; P <.001). Additionally, the mean percent change at week 24 in the respective arms was –50.6% (95% CI, –53.2% to –48.0%) vs –30.6% (95% CI, –33.7% to –27.5%). Spleen volume response was consistently higher with pelabresib vs placebo across predefined subgroups.

Furthermore, the hemoglobin response rate, defined as a 1.5 g/dl or greater mean increase, occurred in in 10.7% of the pelabresib arm (95% CI, 6.60%-14.90%) vs 6.0% of the placebo arm (95% CI, 2.85%-9.19%). Transfusions were received in the first 24 weeks of treatment in 27.6% and 37.5% of respective arms.

Greater reductions in NF-κB-regulated cytokines (–32.1% [95% CI, –34.9% to –29.2%] vs –19.4% [95% CI, –22.5% to –16.2%]), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; –43.5% [95% CI, –47.0% to –39.8%] vs –26.4% [95% CI, –30.5% to –22.1%]), and interleukin-6 (IL-6; –35.4% [95% CI, –44.2% to –25.2%] vs –14.5% [95% CI, –25.2% to –2.3%]) were seen in the investigational arm vs the placebo arm. Of note, a reduction in IL-8 levels was observed with pelabresib (–14.3% [95% CI, –22.3% to –5.5%]), but an increase was observed in the placebo arm (31.2% [95% CI, 17.5%-46.5%).

Read more

Dr Rampal on ​Emerging Therapies Under Investigation in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

March 17, 2025

Author(s): Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD

Fact checked by: Ashling Wahner ,Chris Ryan

Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses emerging treatments for patients with myelofibrosis.

The therapeutic paradigm for myelofibrosis continues to expand with emerging treatment options, particularly with combination therapies, novel JAK inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic agents, Rampal begins. Among these, pelabresib (CPI-0610), a BET inhibitor, has completed phase 3 trials. Preliminary data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495), which were presented in December 2023, demonstrated improved spleen responses and a trend toward better symptom management with the combination of pelabresib and ruxolitinib (Jakafi) vs placebo plus ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis. Updated findings from MANIFEST-2 were published in Nature Medicine in March 2025.

Beyond pelabresib, several other agents are currently in phase 3 trials for patients with myelofibrosis, Rampal says. Selinexor (Xpovio), which is currently FDA approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, is being studied in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in the phase 3 XPORT-MF-034 trial (NCT04562389). Additionally, navtemadlin (KRT-232), an MDM2 inhibitor, is undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with myelofibrosis. Notably, these trials are ongoing, and no conclusive data are available at this time, Rampal emphasizes.

The development of next-generation JAK inhibitors also represents a promising area of investigation, according to Rampal. These newer inhibitors are anticipated to demonstrate greater potency and selectivity compared with existing agents, though they remain in early-phase clinical trials, he notes.

Rampal states that one of the most exciting advancements in this setting is the emergence of immunotherapies. Calreticulin-targeted antibodies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, and 2 candidates are in development, he reports. If these agents prove effective, they could significantly alter the treatment paradigm, he concludes.

Read more

Jakafi May Not Associate with Long-Term Benefits in Myelofibrosis Subset

Posted on by

March 16, 2025

Author(s): Spencer Feldman

Fact checked by: Alex Biese

Among patients with calreticulin (CALR)-mutated myelofibrosis, real-world data reveal insights into those with splenomegaly and/or symptoms requiring therapy with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors.

The findings suggest that while Jakafi (ruxolitinib) shows some initial benefits, CALR-mutated patients may require more targeted and innovative therapeutic approaches for better long-term outcomes, according to study findings published in Annals of Hematology.

“Overall, despite the initial benefits of [Jakafi], CALR-mutated patients may require more innovative therapeutic interventions to achieve optimal outcomes. This further emphasizes the necessity of exploring alternative or adjunctive therapies tailored specifically for CALR-mutated individuals,” lead study author Dr. Francesca Palandri and colleagues wrote in the study.

Palandri is currently an adjunct professor primarily based in the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine at the Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy. She is also a junior researcher at Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Institute of Hematology, Bologna, Italy.

Patients with CALR mutations began Jakafi with more severe disease, including higher peripheral blast counts, lower hemoglobin levels and worse marrow fibrosis, and after a longer median time from diagnosis (2.6 versus 0.7 years) compared to patients with JAK2 mutations. At six months, spleen responses were numerically lower in CALR-mutated patients, who also had lower rates of symptom responses (56.1% versus 66.7%, respectively). However, CALR-mutated patients experienced lower rates of high white blood cell counts.

Furthermore, in patients with delayed Jakafi initiation, anemia and reduced starting doses correlated with poorer survival. Managing anemia through interventions like danazol, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, iron chelation and optimized Jakafi dosing may improve outcomes, according to study authors. The study also highlights the potential benefits of alternative JAK2 inhibitors with lower hematological toxicity.

Read more