Fedratinib Shows Promise in Rare Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

By Andrew Kuykendall, MD

Andrew Kuykendall, MD, an assistant member at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center of University of South Florida in Tampa, FL, discusses data from a phase 2 trial (NCT05177211) which evaluated fedratinib (Inrebic), a JAK2-selective kinase inhibitor, in patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-unclassifiable, and MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis per the 2016 WHO classification.

According to findings from this multi-institutional, investigator-initiated study presented at the 2024 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting, fedratinib demonstrated promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile in this patient population.

At the time of data cutoff, 24 patients were enrolled and 19 patients were evaluable. A total of 53% of patients achieved a response at 24 weeks, including 50% symptom responses and 37.5% spleen responses. Of those treated for ≥24 weeks, spleen volume decreased by an average of 32%, and 85% showed symptomatic improvement. Responses were enriched in patients with CSF3R mutations (83%) and JAK-STAT pathway mutations (70%). Further, the median overall survival (OS) was estimated at 19.7 months.

“This was a very high-risk population, as these diagnoses are associated with poor prognosis. Despite that, we observed spleen responses in approximately 35% of patients, symptom responses in 50%, and some durable responses, with the median time on treatment nearing a year. These outcomes were particularly exciting given the molecular features of this patient population, which typically predict lower response rates,” Kuykendall shares.

Safety findings showed that fedratinib was well tolerated, The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grades 1 or 2, and the most commonly seen AEs were diarrhea (37.5%), constipation (37.5%), and anemia (29%). A single grade 4 neutropenia event resolved with dose adjustments.

“Regarding the safety profile, it was consistent with prior studies of fedratinib. There were some manageable low-grade gastrointestinal [adverse events]. We implemented a more proactive approach to mitigate these, including the use of antiemetics during the first 8 weeks. Overall, the [adverse event] profile remained manageable, and the efficacy outcomes likely exceeded our initial expectations,” adds Kuykendall.

Read more

Management of common autoimmune diseases in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with pegylated interferon alfa—case report, review of the literature and multidisciplinary clinical practice recommendations

May 8, 2025

Axel RüferChristoph Brand[…], and Sacha S. Zeerleder

Abstract

Pegylated interferons alfa are increasingly used in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) due to their potential disease-modifying effect. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has been approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) with no symptomatic splenomegaly as first-line cytoreductive therapy, based on the results of the PROUD-PV/CONTINUATION-PV studies, documenting significantly higher rates of complete hematologic response (CHR) compared with hydroxyurea from 2-year timepoint onward. Although safety profile of pegylated interferons is overall good, interferon-related toxicities can occur. Focus of this article is on interferon-mediated autoimmune diseases. We describe two patients with PV treated with pegylated interferons alfa, one patient developed a cutaneous, paranasal sarcoidosis without any systemic symptoms and was successfully treated with topical steroids. The other patient developed widespread psoriatric skin lesions, which were treated with moderate effect with topical therapy with calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate foam, antidry calm lotion and in the course of the disease with ultraviolet light therapy (UVB). Only with methotrexate she achieved a nearly complete remission of the psoriasis. In both patients pegylated interferon was continued in view of the CHR and therefore the beneficial effect on MPN. We review the pertinent literature on the management of interferon-mediated autoimmune diseases in patients with MPN. As there is little published evidence on that topic, we propose multidisciplinary clinical practice recommendations based on available evidence and clinical experience in the management of patients with MPN treated with pegylated interferon alfa.

Multihit TP53 Gene Mutations May Be Detrimental in MF

Multihit mutations in the TP53 gene (mTP53MUT) have an equally detrimental effect on long-term survival in patients with both myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) like myelofibrosis (MF) and those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to a new study published in the American Journal of Hematology. mTP53MUT could, therefore, be used as a predictor of short-term survival in both diseases.

These findings are based on the analysis of data from 142 patients from the Mayo Clinic database with mTP53MUT-associated MPN or AML. Of these patients, 14 had accelerated phase MPN, 19 had chronic phase MPN, 28 had blast phase MPN, and 81 had AML.

Mutations in the ASXL1EZH2IDH1, and IDH2 genes were more common in patients with blast-phase MPN and mTP53MUT compared to those with AML and mTP53MUT.

At a median follow-up of 11.6  months, 124 patients died, and 19 patients had an allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Overall survival, which was calculated from the time of the detection of a mTP53MUT, was similar between patients with blast-phase and accelerated-phase MPN at 4.6 and 5.6  months, respectively.

However, overall survival was longer in patients with chronic phase MPN and mTP53MUT at 11.6 months, which was similar to overall survival in patients with AML and mTP53MUT, which was 7.4 months.

Multivariable analysis showed that disease stage, allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and response to pre-transplant chemotherapy positively affected overall survival while the presence of concurrent TET2 or DNMT3A mutations affected it negatively.

Read more

Ruxolitinib Discontinuation at Conditioning Does Not Increase GVHD Risk in Myelofibrosis

May 7, 2025

Author(s): Alexandra Gerlach, Associate Editor

Stopping ruxolitinib (Jakafi; Incyte Corp) prior to the conditioning regimen may not influence graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risk more than in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), according to data published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.1

MF is an incurable, rare hematologic malignancy that is part of a group of diseases called myeloproliferative neoplasms, which are characterized by the overproduction of red blood cells. This causes bone marrow scarring, leading to severe anemia—a key factor impacting overall survival for patients with MF. Other symptoms include fatigue, enlarged spleen, night sweats, bone pain, and weight loss. MF can develop as a primary disease or secondary to essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera. In some cases, it can progress to acute myeloid leukemia.2

Ruxolitinib is the standard of care for first-line treatment of patients with MF that was originally approved by the FDA in 2011 for the treatment of intermediate- and high-risk MF. It was also the first approved treatment for patients 12 years of age and older with steroid-refractory acute GVHD in 2019. Ruxolitinib is a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor that targets the JAK/STAT pathway, a critical cellular signaling pathway that helps cells respond to cytokines. Identification of mutations within the JAK/STAT pathway paved the way for the development of agents such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib (Inrebic; Bristol Myers Squibb), momelotinib (Ojjaara; GSK), and pacritinib (Vonjo; CTI BioPharma).2,3

Read more

MOMENTUM Trial Outcomes: Guiding Therapy for Myelofibrosis With Anemia and Splenomegaly

By Pankit Vachhani, MD
Edward Pearson, MD
elists discuss how the MOMENTUM trial demonstrated momelotinib’s superiority over danazol in symptomatic anemic myelofibrosis patients, showing significant improvements in symptoms (the primary end point), meaningful spleen volume reduction (SVR25/SVR35), and anemia benefits, with experts noting that the inclusion of a washout period provided clearer evidence of momelotinib’s efficacy profile compared to the SIMPLIFY-2 trial.

Summary of MOMENTUM Trial: Momelotinib in Anemic, Symptomatic Myelofibrosis

Study Design and Population

  • Patient characteristics:
    • Required hemoglobin <10 g/dL
    • Symptomatic disease
    • Previously treated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor therapy
  • Design elements:
    • Primary end point was symptom-driven
    • Active comparator arm (danazol) rather than placebo
    • Included a washout period (unlike SIMPLIFY-2)

Key Findings

  • Primary end point:
    • Momelotinib demonstrated superior symptom benefits compared to danazol
  • Secondary end points:
    • Multiple secondary end points met with superiority
    • Stronger spleen volume reduction data (SVR25, SVR35) than in SIMPLIFY-2
    • Confirmed anemia benefits

Clinical Implications

  • Comprehensive benefit profile:
    • Triple benefit: spleen reduction, symptom improvement, and anemia benefits
    • Washout period may have contributed to clearer demonstration of spleen benefits compared to SIMPLIFY-2
  • Clinician perspective:
    • Some practitioners noted less direct relevance of danazol comparison in their practice
    • Nevertheless, provided further evidence of momelotinib’s anemia benefit
    • Results support momelotinib use in patients with anemic, symptomatic myelofibrosis who have received prior JAK inhibitor therapy

The MOMENTUM trial reinforces momelotinib’s position in the treatment algorithm, particularly for patients with anemia who have been previously treated with other JAK inhibitors.

Read more

Strategic JAK Inhibitor Sequencing: Translating SIMPLIFY I/II Outcomes to Optimize Myelofibrosis Management

By Pankit Vachhani, MD
Edward Pearson, MD

Summary of Momelotinib Clinical Trials and Second-Line Applications

SIMPLIFY-1 (First-Line Setting)

  • Efficacy comparison with ruxolitinib in newly diagnosed myelofibrosis:
    • Spleen response: Momelotinib demonstrated spleen volume reduction
    • Symptom improvement: Not as robust as ruxolitinib
    • Anemia benefit: Preserved transfusion independence at week 24 vs baseline, while ruxolitinib showed slight decline
  • Clinical considerations for newly diagnosed myelofibrosis with moderate anemia:
    • Potential benefit of single-agent therapy (avoiding combination with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents)
    • When anemia contributes significantly to symptom burden, momelotinib may be preferable

SIMPLIFY-2 (Second-Line Setting)

  • Study design: Effectively a comparison of momelotinib vs ruxolitinib in previously treated patients
    • No washout period between treatments
  • Key outcomes:
    • Spleen response: Comparable between momelotinib and control (“a wash”)
    • Anemia: Clear advantage for momelotinib
    • Symptom control: Superior with momelotinib in the second-line setting
  • Expert opinion on optimal positioning:
    • Panel indicated greater preference for momelotinib in the second-line setting
    • Particularly valuable in patients with worsening anemia or diminishing spleen response on ruxolitinib
    • Setting appropriate expectations is crucial; emphasize anemia and symptom benefits rather than additional spleen reduction

Read more

FDA Grants Fast Track Designation to Givinostat for Polycythemia Vera

May 6, 2025

Author(s): Jax DiEugenio

Fact checked by: Chris Ryan

The FDA has granted fast track designation to givinostat (Duvyzat), an orally administered histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera (PV).1

The agent is being evaluated in the ongoing phase 3 GIV-IN PV trial (NCT06093672), which aims to compare the efficacy and safety of givinostat to hydroxyurea in patients with JAK2 V617F–positive, high-risk PV, which is characterized by the clonal overproduction of erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic lineages within the bone marrow. By targeting aberrant gene expression, givinostat may suppress pathologic cell proliferation associated with driver mutations such as JAK2 V617F, which are common in patients with PV.

“The FDA decision to grant givinostat fast track designation underscores the urgent need for innovative treatments for PV and highlights the potential of givinostat to make a meaningful difference,” Paolo Bettica, MD, PhD, chief medical officer at Italfarmaco Group, stated in a news release. “We look forward to working closely with the FDA as we plan for completion of our phase 3 clinical trial.”

The FDA and European Medicines Agency both previously granted orphan drug designation to givinostat for PV. In the United States, the FDA previously approved givinostat for the treatment of patients 6 years of age or older with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.2

Read more

Pegylated Interferons: Still a Major Player for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Michael Daunov, DO1 and Rebecca B. Klisovic, MD1

Overview

Over the past 35 years, interferons have been explored in various formulations for the management of Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), such as essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis, and remain a key tool in caring for patients with these diseases. These agents are excellent cytoreductive agents with high rates of hematologic response, are helpful in symptom management, and have a long track record of safety and manageable toxicities. More recently, they have shown promise in sustaining responses over many years, with associated reductions in driver mutations (JAK2, MPL, CALR) of these diseases, particularly in PV and ET. Since reductions in molecular mutant allele burden have been correlated with several response outcomes such as reductions in both thrombotic risk and disease progression, there is emerging proof that interferons may offer disease-modifying activity. These long-term benefits and their use as the preferred agent in young pregnant women who need cytoreduction make interferons often the first choice in young adult population who harbor a lifetime risk of progression. Looking forward, the prospect of sustained treatment-free responses, like chronic myeloid leukemia after deep molecular response, and normal life expectancy may also be on the frontier. Despite relative rookies such as JAK inhibitors in the MPN landscape, the veteran in the game, interferon, remains a key player.

Read more

Clinical Trial Aims to Test Tagraxofusp and Pacritinib Combination Therapy in Patients With MF

A new study testing the combination of tagraxofusp and pacritinib in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is now open.

The single-center, open-label, early phase 1, pilot trial aims to recruit 20 patients with MF who are at least 18 years of age and who have previously been treated with a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor or in whom JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy is not appropriate, is contraindicated, or was declined.

Participants will be given 12 µg/kg of intravenous tagraxofusp once a day for 3 consecutive days and 200 mg of oral pacritinib twice a day starting at the 4th day of the second cycle and administered continuously with subsequent cycles starting on day 1 of each cycle.

The primary outcome measures will be a spleen volume reduction of 35% of more and the change in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score Version 2.0 (MPN-SAF TSS 2.0) from baseline to week 24.

Secondary outcome measures will include the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, the change from baseline in anemia and platelet count, and any improvement in patients’ quality of life based on the global impression of change.

Tagraxofusp is a cytotoxin directed at CD123, and pacritinib is a small-molecule kinase inhibitor. The rationale of using these 2 drugs in combination is their compatible mechanisms of action targeting MF stem cells and the bone marrow. It is thought that the combination may lead to improvements in symptoms associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms and reduce splenomegaly.

Both agents have previously been studied in cases of mildly depleted bone marrow and were shown to be safe and led to hematological improvements.

The trial is not yet recruiting participants but aims to recruit 20 participants. It is estimated to be completed in December 2026.

Read more

Real-World Findings Confirm Clinical Data on Momelotinib in MF With Anemia

May 1, 2025

Author(s): AJMC Contributor

Real-world insights on momelotinib (Ojjaara; GlaxoSmithKline) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and anemia have been published, showing consistent and, in some cases, better results than those shown previously in clinical studies of the drug.1

The results offer some of the first glimpses into real-world findings of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, which received approval toward the end of 2023, becoming the first and only treatment indicated for patients with MF and anemia.2

“This study presents the largest real-world cohort of MF patients treated with momelotinib and is the first to apply the recently proposed 2024 criteria for anemia response,” wrote the researchers, publishing the insights in Blood Cancer Journal.1

The retrospective study included 122 patients with MF and anemia across multiple treatment centers. Patients had disease-related symptoms or symptomatic splenomegaly and could be JAK-naive (23.4%) or previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor (76.6%).

At treatment initiation, 73.8% of patients were dependent on transfusions. Among these patients, the median Hb level increased from 7.7 g/dL (range, 4.7-9.8) at treatment initiation to 8.7 g/dL at 3 months of follow-up. By 6 months, 30.6% of patients had major responses and 36.1% had minor responses. At the time follow-up point, median red blood cell transfusion frequency had dropped from 4 units per month to 1 unit per month.

The results offer some of the first glimpses into real-world findings of the JAK inhibitor momelotinib, which was approved in 2023.

Among the remaining patients who were not dependent on transfusions at treatment initiation, the median Hb level increased from 8.9 g/dL (range, 7.2-10.8) to 10.2 g/dL. At 6 months of follow-up, 36.4% of patients demonstrated a major response, and 27.3% demonstrated a minor response.

Read more