Author Archives: MPN Advocacy & Education

Role of Long Noncoding RNA Defined in Pathogenesis of MPNs

Posted on by

August 22, 2024

Vicki Moore, PhD

A role for lnc-AC004893, a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) was revealed in a study reported in the journal Hematology.

“Treatment with JAK2 inhibitors combined with the inhibition of lnc-AC004893 might improve the clinical treatment efficiency in MPN patients,” the study investigators wrote in their report.

A lncRNA is a nonprotein coding transcript with a length of more than 200 nucleotides, which may potentially have a biological function and could be dysregulated in the setting of disease. The investigators set out to explore whether lncRNA may have a role in MPN pathogenesis.

To evaluate this, the investigators conducted lncRNA sequencing from bone marrow mononuclear cells in 3 patients with MPN and 3 control individuals. They identified approximately 500 different lncRNAs that appeared expressed at a level of greater than or less than 2.0-fold in patients with MPN, in comparison with the expression level in control individuals.

From among these lncRNAs, the investigators performed further analyses related to expression and other characteristics. These analyses identified lnc-AC004893 as being of potential interest.

The investigators further evaluated lnc-AC004893 in samples from 150 patients with MPN, compared with 20 control individuals, and identified an approximately 5-fold increase in lncRNA transcript in patients with MPN, compared with the control population.

Read more

Assessing and Managing Bleeding Risk Pre-Surgery in Patients With MPNs

Posted on by

August 20 , 2024

Risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) who are scheduled for surgery are multifaceted and require consideration of individual patient characteristics, risk assessment, and perioperative management, according to results published in Cureus.

“Thrombosis, venous or arterial, is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in [essential thrombocythemia (ET)] and [polycythemia vera], while bleeding is more concerning in [myelofibrosis] and ET,” Mihaela Andreescu, MD, PhD, and colleagues wrote. “Surgical procedures also pose a significant risk for bleeding in MPNs, with a probability of 7.2% during surgery. Assessing bleeding and thrombosis risk in patients scheduled for surgery is crucial to optimize patient outcomes.”

Specific Risks for Bleeding and Thrombosis

Risk assessment tools included rational elastrometry (ROTEM), International Predictive Score for Thrombosis in ET (IPSET), and the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS).

The researchers identified age (>60), history of thrombosis, and genetic mutations, particularly variants of JAK2V617F, as risk factors for thrombosis in patients with MPN. Risk factors for bleeding included leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and history of bleeding.

“Individual patient factors must be considered to minimize severe bleeding and thrombotic complications in surgeries,” Dr. Andreescu and colleagues wrote. “Risk assessment and perioperative management are important aspects of improving the QOL and preventing complications in surgeries.”

Read more

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to assess efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with early/lower-risk primary myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Ghaith Abu-Zeinah, Albert Qin, Harinder Gill, Norio Komatsu, John Mascarenhas, Weichung Joe Shih, Oleh Zagrijtschuk, Toshiaki Sato, Kazuya Shimoda, Richard T. Silver & Ruben Mesa

Abstract

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive of the myeloproliferative neoplasms and patients require greater attention and likely require earlier therapeutic intervention. Currently approved treatment options are limited in their selective suppression of clonal proliferation resulting from driver- and coexisting gene mutations. Janus kinase inhibitors are approved for symptomatic patients with higher-risk PMF. Additionally, most ongoing clinical studies focus on patients with higher-risk disease and/or high rates of transfusion dependency. Optimal treatment of early/lower-risk PMF remains to be identified and needs randomized clinical trial evaluations. Pegylated interferon alfa is recommended for symptomatic lower-risk PMF patients based on phase 2 non-randomized studies and expert opinion. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg) is a new-generation pegylated interferon-based therapy with favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profiles, requiring less frequent injections than prior formulations. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial will assess its efficacy and safety in patients with “early/lower-risk PMF”, defined as pre-fibrotic PMF or PMF at low or intermediate-1 risk according to Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus. Co-primary endpoints include clinically relevant complete hematologic response and symptom endpoint. Secondary endpoints include progression- or event-free survival, molecular response in driver or relevant coexisting gene mutations, bone marrow response, and safety. Disease progression and events are defined based on the International Working Group criteria and well-published reports. 150 eligible patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ropeg or placebo. Blinded sample size re-estimation is designed. Ropeg will be administered subcutaneously with a tolerable, higher starting-dose regimen. The study will provide important data for the treatment of early/lower-risk PMF for which an anti-clonal, disease-modifying agent is highly needed.

Read more

Platelet proteomic profiling reveals potential mediators of immunothrombosis and proteostasis in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

August 14, 2024

Sarah Kelliher, Sara Gamba, Luisa Weiss, Zhu Shen, Marina Marchetti, Francesca Schieppati, Caitriona Scaife, Stephen Madden, Kathleen Bennett, Anne Fortune, Su Maung, Michael Fay, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, 
Patricia Maguire, Anna Falanga, Barry Kevane, Anandi Krishnan

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic bone marrow malignancies characterized by clonal proliferation of hematopoietic precursors and elevated cell counts in peripheral blood.1 Patients with MPN are at risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia and experience a substantial burden of microvascular symptoms.2,3 However, thrombosis (both arterial and venous) represents the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET).4-6

Translational studies have indicated that the platelet proteome influences pathways relating to immune response, inflammation, and malignancy.7,8 Thrombocytosis and platelet hyperactivity are hallmarks of MPN;9 however, platelet count in isolation is not predictive of clinical outcome, and conventional antiplatelet therapy does not fully mitigate thrombotic risk.10 A comprehensive picture of the MPN platelet molecular profile is lacking, and to date, no studies have evaluated the unbiased platelet proteome in a sizable clinical cohort of affected patients. Here, we performed untargeted quantitative profiling of the platelet proteome in a large (n = 140) cohort of patients with PV and ET.

Using standardized platelet isolation protocols (supplemental Methods), we prepared purified platelets from peripheral blood samples of patients with an established diagnosis of MPN (World Health Organization defined, n = 59 ET, n = 41 PV) and a cohort of healthy controls (n = 40) recruited across 2 sites: Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Pertinent clinical features are shown in Figure 1 (and listed in supplemental Table 1). Interpatient variability, including age, sex, and treatment, as well as experimental batch effects, were adjusted as confounding factors in downstream expression analyses (supplemental Methods). Focusing on the most prothrombotic subtypes of MPNs, we hypothesized that the platelet proteome differs in MPN, and its characterization would offer insights into the underlying pathobiology and possible mechanisms underlying the associated clinical complications.

Read more

Efficacy of a JAK2/mTOR Inhibitor Combination in Controlling Acute Graft-vs-Host Disease

Posted on by

By The ASCO Post Staff
Posted: 8/8/2024

Adding a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor to standard immunosuppressive drugs may not improve prevention of acute graft-vs-host disease in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing treatment with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, according to a recent study published by Pidala et al in Blood.

Background

Hematopoietic cell transplantation may offer a potential cure in patients with hematologic malignancies; however, between 10% and 20% of patients who receive stem cells from a donor through allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation develop acute graft-vs-host disease within the first 100 days following transplant. This condition occurs when a donor’s immune cells identify the patient’s cells as foreign and attack them. Apart from disease recurrence, graft-vs-host disease can be life threatening and greatly impact a patient’s quality of life posttransplant.

While JAK inhibition is often effective in treating graft-vs-host disease—the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is indicated for the treatment of refractory graft-vs-host disease—the researchers conducting the recent trial addressed whether JAK inhibitors could have a role in graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis. JAK2 inhibitors are capable of turning off the JAK2 gene—which promotes inflammation and contributes to the development of graft-vs-host disease.

“JAK inhibitors are active in treating [graft-vs-host disease] that does not respond to steroids,” explained senior study author Brian Betts, MD, Vice Chair of Strategic Initiatives for Transplant & Cellular Therapy at the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center. “But the question over the past 10 years has been whether JAK inhibition could prevent [graft-vs-host disease],” he added.

Read more

Myeloproliferative neoplasms: young patients, current data and future considerations

Posted on by

August 7, 2024

Marta Sobas, Jean-Christophe Ianotto, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian & Claire Harrison

Abstract

The Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders predominantly occurring in elderly, whereas in children and young adults are quite infrequent. Therefore, less is known about clinical presentation, genetic abnormalities, prognosis and best management strategies for this groups of patients. Currently, more cases of younger MPN patients are diagnosed. Nevertheless, diagnosis of MPNs, especially in childhood, may be difficult due to lower incidence of JAK2V617F and CALR mutations and differences in peripheral blood counts between adults and children. Challenges for younger MPN patients are longer life expectances, specific psychosocial need, fertility and pregnancy need and a long term therapy side effect (including second cancers). The most severe MPNs complication is transformation to secondary myelofibrosis (MF) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Optimal management of young MPNs remains a challenge as the classical risk scores fail in young MPNs. Moreover, the main objective of young MPNs therapy should be the disease outcome modification. Therefore, international collaborative work between pediatricians and “adult hematologists” is required to measure outcomes and generate protocol of management of young MPNs.

Read more

 

Risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms among U.S. Veterans from Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras

Posted on by

July 18, 2024

Andrew Tiu, Zoe McKinnell, Shanshan Liu, Puneet Gill, Martha Antonio, Zoe Shancer, Nandan Srinivasa, Guoqing Diao, Ramesh Subrahmanyam, Craig M. Kessler, Maneesh Jain

Abstract

The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act expanded U.S. Veterans’ health care and benefits for conditions linked to service-connected exposures (e.g., Burn Pits, Agent Orange). However, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are not recognized as presumptive conditions for Veterans exposed to these toxic substances. This study evaluated the development of MPN among U.S. Veterans from the Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. This retrospective cohort study included 65 425 Korean War era Veterans; 211 927 Vietnam War era Veterans; and 214 007 Persian Gulf War era Veterans from January 1, 2006, to January 26, 2023. Veterans with MPN, thrombosis, bleeding, and cardiovascular risk factors were identified through ICD-9 and -10 codes. Veterans from the Persian Gulf War era had the highest risk of developing MPN compared with Veterans from the Korean and Vietnam War eras, hazard ratio (HR) 4.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.20–5.75 and HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.20–2.82, both p < .0001, respectively. Vietnam War era Veterans also had a higher risk of MPN development compared with Korean War era Veterans, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.77–2.21, p < .0001. Persian Gulf War era Veterans were diagnosed with MPN at an earlier age, had higher risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and had lower survival rates compared with Korean War and Vietnam War era Veterans. This study reinforces evidence that environmental and occupational hazards increase the risk of clonal myeloid disorders and related complications, impacting overall survival with MPN. Limitations include the inability to confirm clonality and fully verify deployment and exposure status.

Read more

Immunofluorescence microscopy on the blood smear identifies patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

July 17, 2024

Carlo Zaninetti, Leonard Vater, Lars Kaderali, Carl C. Crodel, Tina M. Schnöder, Jessica Fuhrmann, Leonard Swensson, Jan Wesche, Carmen Freyer, Andreas Greinacher & Florian H. Heidel

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal stem cell disorders with heterogeneous clinical presentation [1]. Due to the risk of severe thromboembolic complications and disease progression, the early recognition of an MPN prior to the appearance of clinical complications is clearly warranted to facilitate early pharmacologic intervention [2,3,4]. Detection of the somatic mutations by genotyping has become an essential part of the diagnostic work-up of suspected subjects, as well as of the risk stratification after the diagnosis of MPN has been confirmed [5]. However, in many parts of the world molecular testing is barely affordable.

We have established an immunofluorescence microscopy (IF)-based method for platelet phenotyping on the peripheral blood smear [6]. This method has been proven to be highly efficient in the diagnosis of diverse hereditary platelet disorders by recognizing disease-specific changes of cell structures, including alterations of leukocytes and red blood cells (RBC) [7, 8]. Major advantages of this approach are the need of small amounts of blood (<100 μL) and the possibility to send the blood films by regular mail even long distances.

It is well-known that morphology of peripheral blood cells is also often altered in MPN [9, 10]. However, due to different methods and the heterogeneity of the patients’ populations, results are difficult to compare.

In the present study, we aimed at assessing platelet phenotype using our IF method in a cohort of patients diagnosed with MPN. The study has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00032588). Three German reference centers for diagnosis and treatment of MPN took part in the study: Internal Medicine C, University Medicine Greifswald; Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital Jena; and Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Germany. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all centers. Patients or their legal guardians signed written informed consent to the investigation, which was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Healthy controls were enrolled among blood donors at the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

Read more

Allogeneic HSCT for Myelofibrosis: What to Know as More Patients Receive Treatment

Posted on by

June 25, 2024

Due to new transplant approaches, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is now perceived as a safer therapeutic option in patients with myelofibrosis, even among older patients. Authors of a review published in the American Journal of Hematology emphasized the crucial role of early consideration and implementation of HSCT in improving clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Despite the approval of new therapies and “various other exciting non-transplant treatments in development, allogeneic HSCT remains at present the only curative therapy for patients with myelofibrosis,” wrote coauthors Haris Ali, MD, and Andrea Bacigalupo, MD.

The challenges associated with treating myelofibrosis include transplant-related mortality and the risk for relapse after HSCT. The authors aimed to provide a comprehensive review of current clinical data, new transplant platforms, and clinical updates, which can enhance patient outcomes.

“The number of patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT annually is steadily increasing,” Dr. Ali and Dr. Bacigalupo wrote. “This reflects the fact that HSCT has become safer with the reduction in non-relapse mortality over the years, making the choice of an HSCT more attractive among hematologists caring for [patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms].”

Read more