Tag Archives: myelofibrosis

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study to assess efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b in patients with early/lower-risk primary myelofibrosis

Posted on by

Ghaith Abu-Zeinah, Albert Qin, Harinder Gill, Norio Komatsu, John Mascarenhas, Weichung Joe Shih, Oleh Zagrijtschuk, Toshiaki Sato, Kazuya Shimoda, Richard T. Silver & Ruben Mesa

Abstract

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is the most aggressive of the myeloproliferative neoplasms and patients require greater attention and likely require earlier therapeutic intervention. Currently approved treatment options are limited in their selective suppression of clonal proliferation resulting from driver- and coexisting gene mutations. Janus kinase inhibitors are approved for symptomatic patients with higher-risk PMF. Additionally, most ongoing clinical studies focus on patients with higher-risk disease and/or high rates of transfusion dependency. Optimal treatment of early/lower-risk PMF remains to be identified and needs randomized clinical trial evaluations. Pegylated interferon alfa is recommended for symptomatic lower-risk PMF patients based on phase 2 non-randomized studies and expert opinion. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg) is a new-generation pegylated interferon-based therapy with favorable pharmacokinetics and safety profiles, requiring less frequent injections than prior formulations. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial will assess its efficacy and safety in patients with “early/lower-risk PMF”, defined as pre-fibrotic PMF or PMF at low or intermediate-1 risk according to Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus. Co-primary endpoints include clinically relevant complete hematologic response and symptom endpoint. Secondary endpoints include progression- or event-free survival, molecular response in driver or relevant coexisting gene mutations, bone marrow response, and safety. Disease progression and events are defined based on the International Working Group criteria and well-published reports. 150 eligible patients will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either ropeg or placebo. Blinded sample size re-estimation is designed. Ropeg will be administered subcutaneously with a tolerable, higher starting-dose regimen. The study will provide important data for the treatment of early/lower-risk PMF for which an anti-clonal, disease-modifying agent is highly needed.

Read more

Triple-Negative Myelofibrosis Associated With Decreased Survival, Aggressive Clinical Behavior and Shorter Duration of Response to Ruxolitinib

Posted on by

August 14, 2024

Amber Denham

According to recently published research in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia, triple-negative myelofibrosis (TN-MF) was found to be continually associated with decreased survival, enhanced aggressive clinical behavior with higher rates of leukemic transformation, and a shorter duration of response to ruxolitinib.

“Myelofibrosis is the most aggressive subtype among classical BCR::ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms…Triple-negative myelofibrosis accounts for only 5% [to] 10% of cases and carries the worst outcomes,” explained lead study author Luis Aguirre, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and colleagues. They added, “Little has been described about this subset of disease…identification of features of interest and assessment of treatment response are areas in need of further investigation.”

Researchers evaluated baseline clinical and molecular parameters from 626 patients with myelofibrosis who presented to the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida, between 2003 and 2021. These data were compared based on the presence or absence of the 3 classical phenotypic driver mutations.

Read more

Donor Type Impacts Survival in MF Cell Transplantation

Posted on by
Leonardo Jaimes

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who receive hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from a matched sibling donor appear to have better overall survival (OS) than those who receive transplants from other donor types, according to a recently published study in Blood Advances.

“Understanding the impact of donor type is crucial not only to improve the clinical outcomes with HCT but also to establish the donor pool with viable options and eventually improve access to HCT,” the authors wrote.

HCT is currently the only disease-modifying therapy available for MF, the study team noted. The outcome after transplantation is diverse and dependent on several disease- and patient-associated factors, they added. According to recent research, donor type could also influence the prognosis of patients with MF after HCT. One study showed that patients with matched sibling donors had a better OS than the rest.

However, previous research has not taken the impact of posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for graft versus host disease prophylaxis into consideration, the researchers noted. Furthermore, no patients in previous studies had received vHLA-haploidentical donor grafts, they continued.

Therefore, the authors aimed to assess the impact of donor type in OS, considering the factors above and using the Center for International Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant Research registry data for HCTs done between 2013 and 2019. The study included over 1000 patients who received HCTs for MF.

Results showed that similarly to previous findings, matched sibling transplants were associated with better overall survival and lower graft failure than the rest. However, OS was only superior to the rest in the first 90 days after transplant. There was no significant difference in OS among patients who received mismatched unrelated, matched unrelated, and haploidentical donor transplants.

Despite the findings, the authors remarked that HCTs should not be delayed in the search for fully matched donors and highlighted the need for solutions regarding graft failure.

Read more

Prospective Study to Evaluate Fedratinib Plus Nivolumab in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by
Andrea S. Blevins Primeau, PhD, MBA

A single-arm, phase 2 study of fedratinib, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, plus nivolumab is planned for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who had a suboptimal or no response to a JAK inhibitor was initiated, according to a report published in the Annals of Hematology.

“This study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for MF patients with suboptimal responses and limited alternatives,” the researchers wrote in their report. Currently, 23 of 30 planned patients are enrolled in the study and recruitment is expected to be completed by December 2024.

The open-label FRACTION trial will treat patients with MF from 9 academic centers in Germany, who will receive 400 mg of fedratinib daily in 28-day cycles, followed by 240 mg of nivolumab every 2 weeks beginning in cycle 2. Treatment will be given until progressive disease, relapse, death, or study discontinuation.

This study will provide new findings that may contribute to advancing the treatment landscape for MF patients with suboptimal responses and limited alternatives.

The primary efficacy endpoints will be response rate within 12 treatment cycles and RCT independency. Secondary endpoints will include safety, incidence of leukemic transformation, clinical benefit, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease burden. Molecular analyses will also serve as exploratory endpoints for the study.

Patients with MF primary or secondary MF are eligible if they had a suboptimal or no response to a JAK inhibitor, which is defined by persistent symptoms, splenomegaly, cytopenia, or hyperproliferation. Patients who have received a prior immune checkpoint inhibitor or history of uncontrolled autoimmune disease are not eligible for the study.

Disclosures: This research was supported in part by Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb. Please see the original reference for a full list of disclosures.

Read more

Dr Watts on the Investigation of INCB057643 in Advanced Myelofibrosis and MPN

Posted on by

July 24, 2024

Author(s): Justin M. Watts, MD

Justin M. Watts, MD, associate professor of medicine, Division of Hematology, chief, Leukemia Section, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, discusses the design of a phase 1 trial (NCT04279847) investigating INCB057643 in patients with advanced myelofibrosis and other myeloid neoplasms, and highlights how this agent could address unmet needs in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

INCB057643 is an oral small molecule BET inhibitor that most selectively targets BRD-4, he begins. The agent is being evaluated in a phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion study of patients with advanced myelofibrosis, including those with relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis and patients who are suboptimal responders to ruxolitinib (Jakafi), Watts details. Patients in the former group received the BET inhibitor as a monotherapy; those in the latter cohort received the agent as an add-on therapy, he explains.

Findings from the study were reported at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting, and demonstrated that INCB057643 when used as a monotherapy (n = 28) or in combination with ruxolitinib (n = 16), was generally well tolerated at doses ranging from 4 mg to 10 mg.

The maximum tolerated dose of the agent was established at 10 mg per day, Watts continues. INCB057643 monotherapy is currently being evaluated in a dose-expansion phase, with the combination regimen being assessed in the dose escalation phase at 8 mg, he reports. Watts notes that 8 mg is likely to be the optimal dose of INCB057643 when administered alongside ruxolitinib. During the dose expansion phases, different dosing of the BET inhibitor is permitted based on a patient’s platelet count, Watts says. This cohort includes both patients with myelofibrosis and those with essential thrombocythemia who have progressed on standard therapy, he states.

Initially, the dose escalation phase of the trial included a cohort of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and MDS/MPN overlap syndrome, Watts expands. However, the study’s focus has since shifted exclusively to patients with advanced myelofibrosis due to the significant unmet needs present in this patient population, Watts says. Many patients with advanced myelofibrosis have progressed on multiple lines of therapy or are completely intolerant or refractory to JAK inhibition, he explains. Accordingly, enhancing their response to therapy, reducing toxicities, decreasing spleen size beyond what can be achieved with ruxolitinib alone, and concurrently addressing anemia could benefit these patients, Watts concludes.

Read more

Pelabresib/Ruxolitinib Data Underscore Need for Novel End Points in Myelofibrosis Trials

Posted on by

July 15, 2024

Author(s): Jax DiEugenio

Although a 35% reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) and a 50% reduction in total symptom score (TSS50) have been established as key end points in clinical trials evaluating therapies for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis, integrating end points such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as key objectives in future studies could help guide drug development and measure any disease-modifying properties of treatments, according to Aaron Gerds, MD.

“[Findings] from [the phase 3] MANIFEST-2 [NCT04603495] and TRANSFORM-1 [NCT04472598] trials are a wakeup call for the field that we need to move beyond SVR35 and TSS50 [as clinical trial end points in myelofibrosis]. We have drugs that are good at making patients’ symptoms better; however, we need are drugs that truly modify the disease course in a meaningful way,” Gerds explained.

Updated data from the MANIFEST-2 presented at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting showed that patients with myelofibrosis who received frontline pelabresib (CPI-0610) plus ruxolitinib (Jakafi; n = 214) experienced an SVR35 rate of 65.9% at week 24 compared with 35.2% for those given ruxolitinib plus placebo (n = 216). Notably, updated data showed that in patients who experienced an SVR35 at any time, 13.4% of patients in the experimental arm lost that response vs 27.8% of patients in the placebo arm.1

Additionally, the TSS50 rates at week 24 were 52.3% for pelabresib plus ruxolitinib vs 46.3% for placebo plus ruxolitinib, translating to a numerical improvement that was not statistically significant (difference, 6.0%; 95% CI, –3.5% to 15.5%; nominal P = .216).

Notably, 40.2% of patients in the pelabresib arm experienced both SVR35 and TSS50 at week 24 compared with 18.5% of patients in the placebo arm.

In an interview with OncLive®, Gerds an assistant professor of medicine, Hematology, and Medical Oncology at Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute in Ohio, detailed prior data from MANIFEST-2 presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting;2 expanded on updated data presented at the 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting; and emphasized the need to look beyond current end points in clinical trials evaluating treatments for patients with myelofibrosis.

Read more

Mascarenhas on the SENTRY Trial Design and Goals

Posted on by

J

By John Mascarenhas, MD

John Mascarenhas, MD, professor, medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, director, Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, member, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, discusses the methods, design, and inclusion criteria of the phase 3 SENTRY trial (NCT04562389) for patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.

SENTRY is a global, multicenter, phase 1/3 study where investigators are assessing the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) combined with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in this patient population.

According to Mascarenhas, the primary end points of phase 3 of the trial include the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of greater than or equal to 35% at week 24 (SVR35), and the proportion of patients with a total symptom score reduction of greater than or equal to 50% at week 24 (TSS50), as measured by the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form V4.0.

Read more

Allogeneic HSCT for Myelofibrosis: What to Know as More Patients Receive Treatment

Posted on by

June 25, 2024

Due to new transplant approaches, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is now perceived as a safer therapeutic option in patients with myelofibrosis, even among older patients. Authors of a review published in the American Journal of Hematology emphasized the crucial role of early consideration and implementation of HSCT in improving clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Despite the approval of new therapies and “various other exciting non-transplant treatments in development, allogeneic HSCT remains at present the only curative therapy for patients with myelofibrosis,” wrote coauthors Haris Ali, MD, and Andrea Bacigalupo, MD.

The challenges associated with treating myelofibrosis include transplant-related mortality and the risk for relapse after HSCT. The authors aimed to provide a comprehensive review of current clinical data, new transplant platforms, and clinical updates, which can enhance patient outcomes.

“The number of patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT annually is steadily increasing,” Dr. Ali and Dr. Bacigalupo wrote. “This reflects the fact that HSCT has become safer with the reduction in non-relapse mortality over the years, making the choice of an HSCT more attractive among hematologists caring for [patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms].”

Read more

Outcomes of the Myelofibrosis Symptom Tracking Survey

Posted on by

We would like to thank the 147 patients who responded to a survey that targeted how people with
Myelofibrosis tracked their symptoms and then how they used the information they gleaned from
their tracking. You’ll never guess what we found.

Nearly 65 percent of respondents said they had never tracked their symptoms. When asked why,
a piece of the MF story unfolded. Some people acknowledged that the variability of both the
symptoms and their occurrence made it difficult to track, while others felt that bringing a focus to
their MF and symptoms each day undermined their mental health. A few mentioned that they
made mental notes of their symptoms, had their various doctors tracking symptoms, or just knew
innately when something changed. Several felt that there was no reason to track their symptoms,
this may be due in part to responses to another question that revealed only around 20 percent of
individuals were encouraged by their physician to keep track of their symptoms. Of those that
did track their symptoms, most did so with their own personal pen-and-paper accounting and
used a variety of approaches using numerical scales, happy and sad faces, or a more journaling
style.

After opening this little window into the MF experience. It was hard not to have additional
questions. For example, could symptom tracking be used as both a self-care practice and a tool of
empowerment? Ultimately, the tools and techniques that are most helpful come from the insight
and strength of those who experience MF every day. If symptom tracking is not the best way to
track symptoms to possibly share with your personal health care team, or the team you work with
during a clinical trial, what does work for you? We would love to learn more, and share what we
learn to benefit others. If you have a response to these questions or anything more you would like
to say on this topic, please email us at ngiocondo@mpnadvocacy.com.

Prospective Analysis Highlights Patterns of Progression to Myelofibrosis Following Essential Thrombocythemia Diagnosis

Posted on by

June 17, 2024

Author(s): Caroline Seymour

Most patients with essential thrombocythemia (95.7%; 1184/1237) included in an analysis of the prospective, observational MOST study (NCT02953704) did not experience disease progression to myelofibrosis, but those who did were found to have had longer duration of disease, higher white blood cell counts, and lower hemoglobin levels at enrollment, according to findings presented at the 2024 EHA Congress.1

Of the 4.3% (n = 53) of patients who progressed to myelofibrosis, a pathologic diagnosis of the disease or grade 2 or greater fibrosis was the most common indicator (49.1%; n = 26) of disease progression, followed by new or worsening splenomegaly coupled with a combination of high white blood cell counts and low hemoglobin levels and platelet counts (22.6%; n = 12). Additional indicators were death from myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML; 11.3%; n = 6) and circulating blasts above 1% with new or worsening splenomegaly (5.7%; n = 3); patients also met at least 2 progression criteria (11.3%; n = 6).

“These findings and further analyses of MOST data will add insight into disease progression in patients with essential thrombocythemia and facilitate clinical management of this patient population,” lead study author Ruben A. Mesa, MD, FACP, president and executive director of Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, and vice dean of cancer programs at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Charlotte, North Carolina, and coauthors wrote in the poster.

Read more