Tag Archives: mpn

Recognizing Symptoms of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Clinical Trial Challenges

Posted on by

October 24, 2024

Author(s): Mary Caffrey, Laura Joszt, MA

The symptoms of myeloproliferative neoplasms can be variable and common, which can make it difficult to diagnose if you aren’t looking for the right thing, said Ruben Mesa, MD, FACP, executive director of Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center and president of Atrium Health Levine Cancer.

He also discusses the challenges with getting patients enrolled in clinical trials, such as the limited availability of them and patient factors that make it difficult to participate.

Read more

Thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a viewpoint on its impact on myelofibrosis, mortality, and solid tumors

Posted on by

October 25, 2024

Tiziano Barbui, Arianna Ghirardi, Alessandra Carobbio, Valerio De Stefano, Alessandro Rambaldi, Ayalew Tefferi & Alessandro M. Vannucchi

Abstract

This viewpoint summarizes findings from analyses of large personal patient databases of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to assess the impact of thrombosis on mortality, disease progression, and second cancers (SC). Despite advances, the current incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis remains a challenge. These events appear to signal a more aggressive disease course, as evidenced by their association with myelofibrosis progression and mortality using multistate models and time-dependent multivariable analysis. Inflammatory biomarkers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), are associated with the aggressiveness of polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET), linking thrombosis to SC risk. This suggests a common inflammatory pathway likely influencing cardiovascular disease and cancer incidence. Notably, this is observed more frequently in younger patients, likely due to prolonged exposure to MPN and environmental inflammatory triggers. These data underscore the need for new studies to validate these associations, delineate the sequence of events, and identify therapeutic targets to mitigate thrombotic events and potentially improve overall patient outcomes in MPN.

Read more

 

FREEDOM2 Trial Shows Fedratinib’s Efficacy and Safety in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

By Jordyn Sava
Fact checked by Sabrina Serani

When given as a second-line JAK inhibitor option in patients with myelofibrosis, fedratinib (Inrebic) showed its effectiveness in achieving spleen volume reduction (SVR) while highlighting strategies for managing gastrointestinal adverse effects (AEs) and thiamine deficiency, according to findings from the FREEDOM2 study (NCT03952039).1

The FREEDOM2 study, a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, involved 316 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis who were either relapsed, refractory, or intolerant to ruxolitinib (Jakafi).2 The median follow-up for survival at the data cutoff on December 27, 2022, was 64.5 weeks (IQR, 37.9-104.9). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving an SVR of at least 35% (SVR35) at the end of cycle 6.

Results from the study demonstrated a significant difference in SVR35 between the fedratinib and best available therapy (BAT) groups, with 36% of patients in the fedratinib group achieving the primary end point compared with only 6% in the BAT group (30% difference; 95% CI 20%-39%; 1-sided P <.0001).1

“Findings from FREEDOM2 support fedratinib as a second-line Janus kinase inhibitor option to reduce spleen size after ruxolitinib failure or intolerance in patients with myelofibrosis,” wrote study authors in findings published in The Lancet Hematology.

Read more

Dr Scandura on the SENTRY-2 Trial of Single-Agent Selinexor in JAK Inhibitor–Naive Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

October 16, 2024

Author(s): Joe Scandura, MD, PhD

Fact checked by: Ryan Scott, Courtney Flaherty

Joseph M. Scandura, MD, PhD, associate attending physician, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital; associate professor, medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, discusses the phase 2 SENTRY-2 study (XPORT-MF-044; NCT05980806) evaluating single-agent selinexor (Xpovio) in JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis.

The FDA granted fast track designation to single-agent selinexor for the treatment of patients with primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, and post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis in July 2023. Notably, selinexor will be assessed in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in the phase 3 portion of the SENTRY trial (NCT04562389) and as a monotherapy in the phase 2 SENTRY-2 study for JAK inhibitor–naive patients.

The primary aim of the SENTRY-2 study is to evaluate the efficacy of selinexor as a standalone treatment for patients with myelofibrosis who have not previously been treated with a JAK inhibitor, Scandura begins. Currently, JAK inhibitors are the only FDA-approved class of drugs for this condition, complicating the ability to test alternative treatments like selinexor independently, he states. However, evidence suggests that selinexor demonstrates activity, prompting the FDA to permit the study’s initiation, Scandura says. In SENTRY-2, patients will start treatment with selinexor, and responses will be measured based on spleen volume reduction and symptom improvement, particularly anemia, he details.

An innovative aspect of the study is its flexibility, Scandura notes. If a patient shows some degree of response but it is not deemed significant, they may have a JAK inhibitor added to their treatment regimen, he explains. This could include ruxolitinib or newer agents such as pacritinib (Vonjoy), which does not suppress platelet counts, making it suitable for patients with low platelets. Momelotinib (Ojjaara), known for its efficacy in improving anemia, will be added if patients are anemic and maintain adequate platelet counts.

The importance of safety and rigorous science is emphasized in clinical trials, especially when evaluating new treatments, Scandura continues. With selinexor already recognized as safe, the focus shifts to optimizing its use in the treatment landscape of myelofibrosis, he says. If selinexor gains FDA approval for myelofibrosis, it could play a significant role in a more nuanced treatment approach, reflecting the complexities of managing this condition amidst financial considerations and the availability of multiple JAK inhibitors, Scandura concludes.

Read more

Persian Gulf War Service Linked to High Rates of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Posted on by

by Mary Anne Dunkin | Sep 15, 2024

WASHINGTON, DC — A study of almost a half-million veterans has found for the first time a link between environmental exposures during military service and the development of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

MPNs—including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF)—are a group of rare, heterogeneous and acquired clonal stem-cell disorders, which lead to uncontrolled proliferation of myeloid cells and complications including arterial and venous thrombosis, bleeding, cardiovascular disease and potentially the development of leukemia. The study’s findings could open MPNs to be recognized as presumptive conditions under the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act, suggested Maneesh R. Jain, MD, one of the study’s leaders.

Jain, a hematologist/oncologist at the Washington, DC VAMC, became intrigued with a possible connection between military exposures and MPN when three of his female patients who had served in the Korean War were diagnosed with MPNs. All three believed their disease was related to exposure to Agent Orange (a tactical herbicide used by the U.S. military for the control of vegetation), as were a number of other veterans they communicated with thought an MPN advocacy group.

To better understand a possible connection, Jain and colleagues at Georgetown University and George Washington University, including hematology/oncology fellow Andrew Tiu, MD, turned to the DoD and VA Infrastructure for Clinical Intelligence (DaVINCI). DaVINCI is an electronic network that provides a consolidated view of electronic medical record data for both service members and veterans.

Their retrospective cohort study, published in the American Journal of Hematology, included 65,425 Korean War era veterans, 211,927 Vietnam War era veterans, and 214,007 Persian Gulf War era veterans from Jan. 1, 2006, to Jan. 26, 2023. Veterans with MPN, thrombosis, bleeding, and cardiovascular risk factors were identified through ICD-9 and -10 codes. Illinois was selected as the state of residence, as it best mirrored the demographics of the entire U.S. cohort in terms of age, race, ethnicity and educational attainment according to the American Community Survey from the U.S. Census Bureau.1

Read more

Pacritinib Demonstrates Efficacy, Tolerability in Patients with Myelofibrosis and Thrombocytopenia

Posted on by

October 16, 2024

Author(s): Alexandra Gerlach, Associate Editor

Pacritinib (Vonjo; CTI BioPharma Corp) demonstrated improved spleen volume reduction (SVR) and was tolerable in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and thrombocytopenia, according to data published in the European Journal of Hematology. The findings offer deeper insights into the capabilities of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to improve SVR and overall survival (OS), contradicting prior studies advising against use of JAK inhibitors for thrombocytopenia.1

Further studies are needed to identify the long-term safety and efficacy of the therapy.

Image Credit: © AkuAku – stock.adobe.com

Thrombocytopenia, a condition that occurs when blood platelet counts are too low, is a disease-related feature of MF that leads to poorer prognoses impacting both OS and leukemia-free survival. It can be caused by a variety of factors including ineffective hematopoiesis, splenic sequestration, and treatment-related effects. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curable treatment for MF but is only available for a minority of patients. However, the development of JAK inhibitors has expanded treatment options for patients with MF and may show promise for treatment of thrombocytopenia.2

Pacritinib is a JAK inhibitor used to treat intermediate or high-risk MF that targets JAK2 and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3. It was approved by the FDA in 2022 for treatment of both primary and secondary MF in patients with platelet counts < 50 x 109/L. In the phase 3, randomized, controlled PERSIST-2 trial (NCT02055781), pacritinib demonstrated favorable efficacy and tolerability compared with best available therapy (BAT) in patients with MF and thrombocytopenia.3-5

In the study, approximately 300 patients with thrombocytopenia and primary or secondary myelofibrosis were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either pacritinib 400 mg once daily, pacritinib 200 mg twice daily, or BAT. The primary end points included SVR of ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline to week 24 as measured by MRI or computed tomography, as well as ≥ 50% reduction in the total symptom score from baseline to week 24 on the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form 2.0.1,5

Read more

Dr Klisovic on a Case Discussion of Momelotinib in Myelofibrosis With Anemia

Posted on by

October 16, 2024

Author(s): Rebecca Klisovic, MD

Fact checked by: Ashling Wahner, Ryan Scott

Rebecca Klisovic, MD, chief medical information officer, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, discusses 3 case studies about patients with myelofibrosis that were presented during an OncLive® State of the Science Summit™ on hematologic oncology, which she chaired.

The first case that was discussed was on a 71-year-old male patient with newly diagnosed myelofibrosis with splenomegaly, mild anemia, a high symptom burden, and intermediate-2–risk disease, Klisovic begins. The consensus among the panelists was that this patient required treatment due to his spleen size, symptoms, and anemia, she says. Although some oncologists who participated in the discussion considered using ruxolitinib (Jakafi) because of its early survival data, the panel predominantly favored momelotinib (Ojjaara), given this agent’s potential benefit in patients with anemia, she explains.

The second case was on a 62-year-old female patient with myelofibrosis who had already received ruxolitinib and had comorbidities including symptom scoring and a large spleen, according to Klisovic. This patient also had anemia, with a hemoglobin level of 7.2 g/dL, she reports. Therefore, the focus on improving anemia made momelotinib a clear treatment choice in this setting, she adds. Whereas other case presentations prompted treatment debates between the panelists, this case was more clear cut, especially since this patient was refractory to ruxolitinib, Klisovic emphasizes.

The third case was on a 54-year-old female patient with newly diagnosed myelofibrosis that was characterized by both anemia and thrombocytopenia, as well as a platelet count of 34/µL, Klisovic says. This discussion centered around the use of pacritinib vs momelotinib, informed by the patient’s low platelet count, she explains. Some discussants raised concerns about the patient’s eligibility for momelotinib clinical trials, which have enrollment criteria with varying platelet cutoffs, she notes. Despite these concerns, most participants favored the use of pacritinib (Vonjo) due to this agent’s efficacy in managing thrombocytopenia, she reports. However, some discussants noted that momelotinib could also be a viable treatment option for patients similar to the one in this case, depending on clinical trial criteria and individual patient factors, she concludes.

Read more

Luspatercept Shows Promise in Alleviating Myelofibrosis-Associated Anemia

Posted on by
Ryner Lai

Luspatercept shows promise in alleviating myelofibrosis-associated anemia and has a safety profile consistent with previous research, according to a study published in Blood Advances. 

The most common therapeutics in myelofibrosis include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, corticosteroids, and lenalidomide. However, many of these are associated with significant adverse events (AEs). Researchers are investigating therapeutic agents that are highly effective against anemia while having an acceptable safety profile.

Luspatercept is an erythropoietin maturation agent that has been approved in the United States for treating anemia in some individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or beta-thalassemia who need red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. This therapeutic has been shown to induce transfusion independence in approximately 38% of patients. Researchers sought to explore if the success of luspatercept can be replicated in myelofibrosis and conducted a study to assess its use in patients with myelofibrosis-associated anemia, with or without transfusion dependence.

Researchers reported results from a phase 2, multicenter, open-label trial that assessed the use of luspatercept in myelofibrosis. They recruited adult patients with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis who possessed an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less and had evidence of anemia. Patients were divided according to their transfusion dependence status and whether they were on ruxolitinib therapy.

Participants received subcutaneous luspatercept at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg (with titration up to 1.75 mg/kg every 21 days for a total of 24 weeks). They were then assessed for their disease response at day 169; if they demonstrated clinical benefits, they could continue receiving luspatercept treatment for approximately 2 years longer. The primary endpoint of this study was anemia response at the end of the 24-week period.

Read more

Selinexor Paves the Way for More Affordable, Effective Treatment Options in Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

October 14, 2024

Author(s): Courtney Flaherty

Fact checked by: Caroline Seymour

Attempts to leverage drugs that are effective in combination, such as selinexor (Xpovio), as single agents for the management JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis reflects the need for improved personalization of therapy according to individual factors, and mitigation of financial toxicities associated with standard JAK inhibitor–based regimens, according to Joseph M. Scandura, MD, PhD.

Selinexor, an oral exportin 1 inhibitor potentially targeting both JAK/STAT and non-JAK/STAT pathways, has previously demonstrated efficacy when used in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in the phase 1/3 SENTRY trial (XPORT-MF-034; NCT04562389). Results from the phase 1 portion of the trial showed a 35% or greater reduction in spleen volume (SVR35) at weeks 12 and 24 in 71% and 79% of patients treated with 60 mg of selinexor plus ruxolitinib in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 14), respectively. Moreover, 58% of patients who achieved symptom improvement of at least 50% (TSS50) at week 24 in the ITT population (n = 12) remained in response at the data cutoff of August 1, 2023.1,2

In July 2023, the FDA granted fast track designation to single-agent selinexorfor the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis, including primary myelofibrosis, post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, and post-polycythemia vera myelofibrosis.3

Selinexor will be evaluated in combination with ruxolitinib in the phase 3 portion of SENTRY,1 and as monotherapy in the phase 2 SENTRY-2 study (XPORT-MF-044; NCT05980806) in JAK inhibitor–naive patients with myelofibrosis.4

“The big thing that differentiates the [SENTRY-2] study is that it’s testing selinexor [alone] and only adding the JAK inhibitor [to selinexor] when it is needed, and it matches the patients’ characteristics. It’s not a one-size-fits-all study,” said Scandura, who is an associate attending physician at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and an associate professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, in New York. “This allows patients to be treated similarly to clinical practice in the context of a clinical trial…and allows us to [learn whether] one of these drugs works much better with selinexor than the other.”

In an interview with OncLive®, Scandura discussed selinexor’s mechanism of action, reviewed clinical data supporting its potential use both alone and in combination with JAK inhibitors in myelofibrosis, and highlighted how approval of this agent as monotherapy could help alleviate financial burdens associated with JAK inhibitor–based regimens.

Read more

Update: Ruxolitinib Beats Best Available Therapy in Treating Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

October 14, 2024

Author(s): Mary Caffrey

An updated meta-analysis confirms that ruxolitinib, the Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor sold as Jakafi, offers improvements in key measures of efficacy compared with best available therapy (BAT) for patients with polycythemia vera (PV),1 a rare, slow-progressing disorder that causes the blood to make too many red blood cells.

Caused by a genetic mutation, PV is not typically fatal on its own, but it can cause dangerous blood clots and damage to the spleen. In a small number of cases, it progresses to more aggressive forms of blood cancer.

The latest results were reported in the journal APMIS,1 formerly known as Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica, et Immunologica Scandinavica.

The analysis followed a 2020 meta-analysis involving 16 studies that appeared in Blood Advances.2 That analysis included evidence from 4 randomized controlled trials and included 663 patients; the authors estimated a thrombosis incidence of 3.09% per year for ruxolitinib vs 5.51% for BAT, but noted that globally, this did not reach significance (P = .098). “A clinical trial on selected patients at high risk of thrombosis would be warranted, but its feasibility is questionable,” the authors wrote.2

The current analysis examines ruxolitinib’s efficacy and safety compared BAT in 1061 patients with PV and in hydroxyurea-resistant and intolerant patients with PV across 6 studies, with a cutoff of November 2023. The patients included 620 on BAT and 441 on ruxolitinib. According to the investigators:

  • Those taking ruxolitinib showed higher hematocrit control (P = .015) and treatment response (P = .04) compared to BAT.
  • Patients taking ruxolitinib had significantly improved Myeloproliferative Neoplasms-Symptom Assessment Form scores (MPN-SAF), P < .01.

However, on the safety front, patients with PV treated with ruxolitinib had higher rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer (P < .01), as has been previously documented.

Read more