Tag Archives: mpn

Risk of myeloproliferative neoplasms among U.S. Veterans from Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras

Posted on by

July 18, 2024

Andrew Tiu, Zoe McKinnell, Shanshan Liu, Puneet Gill, Martha Antonio, Zoe Shancer, Nandan Srinivasa, Guoqing Diao, Ramesh Subrahmanyam, Craig M. Kessler, Maneesh Jain

Abstract

The Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act expanded U.S. Veterans’ health care and benefits for conditions linked to service-connected exposures (e.g., Burn Pits, Agent Orange). However, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are not recognized as presumptive conditions for Veterans exposed to these toxic substances. This study evaluated the development of MPN among U.S. Veterans from the Korean, Vietnam, and Persian Gulf War eras. This retrospective cohort study included 65 425 Korean War era Veterans; 211 927 Vietnam War era Veterans; and 214 007 Persian Gulf War era Veterans from January 1, 2006, to January 26, 2023. Veterans with MPN, thrombosis, bleeding, and cardiovascular risk factors were identified through ICD-9 and -10 codes. Veterans from the Persian Gulf War era had the highest risk of developing MPN compared with Veterans from the Korean and Vietnam War eras, hazard ratio (HR) 4.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.20–5.75 and HR 2.49, 95% CI 2.20–2.82, both p < .0001, respectively. Vietnam War era Veterans also had a higher risk of MPN development compared with Korean War era Veterans, HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.77–2.21, p < .0001. Persian Gulf War era Veterans were diagnosed with MPN at an earlier age, had higher risks of thrombosis and bleeding, and had lower survival rates compared with Korean War and Vietnam War era Veterans. This study reinforces evidence that environmental and occupational hazards increase the risk of clonal myeloid disorders and related complications, impacting overall survival with MPN. Limitations include the inability to confirm clonality and fully verify deployment and exposure status.

Read more

Immunofluorescence microscopy on the blood smear identifies patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

July 17, 2024

Carlo Zaninetti, Leonard Vater, Lars Kaderali, Carl C. Crodel, Tina M. Schnöder, Jessica Fuhrmann, Leonard Swensson, Jan Wesche, Carmen Freyer, Andreas Greinacher & Florian H. Heidel

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal stem cell disorders with heterogeneous clinical presentation [1]. Due to the risk of severe thromboembolic complications and disease progression, the early recognition of an MPN prior to the appearance of clinical complications is clearly warranted to facilitate early pharmacologic intervention [2,3,4]. Detection of the somatic mutations by genotyping has become an essential part of the diagnostic work-up of suspected subjects, as well as of the risk stratification after the diagnosis of MPN has been confirmed [5]. However, in many parts of the world molecular testing is barely affordable.

We have established an immunofluorescence microscopy (IF)-based method for platelet phenotyping on the peripheral blood smear [6]. This method has been proven to be highly efficient in the diagnosis of diverse hereditary platelet disorders by recognizing disease-specific changes of cell structures, including alterations of leukocytes and red blood cells (RBC) [7, 8]. Major advantages of this approach are the need of small amounts of blood (<100 μL) and the possibility to send the blood films by regular mail even long distances.

It is well-known that morphology of peripheral blood cells is also often altered in MPN [9, 10]. However, due to different methods and the heterogeneity of the patients’ populations, results are difficult to compare.

In the present study, we aimed at assessing platelet phenotype using our IF method in a cohort of patients diagnosed with MPN. The study has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00032588). Three German reference centers for diagnosis and treatment of MPN took part in the study: Internal Medicine C, University Medicine Greifswald; Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital Jena; and Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Germany. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all centers. Patients or their legal guardians signed written informed consent to the investigation, which was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Healthy controls were enrolled among blood donors at the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

Read more

Dr Klisovic on the Early Use of JAK Inhibitors in Younger Patients With Low-Risk Myelofibrosis

Posted on by

July 15, 2024

Author(s): Rebecca Klisovic, MD

Rebecca Klisovic, MD, chief medical information officer, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, discusses a case study featuring a patient with newly diagnosed myelofibrosis and reviews the optimal JAK inhibitor–based treatment regimen for this patient, as determined by a panel of oncologists at an OncLive® State of the Science Summit™ on hematologic malignancies.

This case study featured a 40-year-old male patient with newly diagnosed myelofibrosis, Klisovic begins. She notes that the discussion about this patient was interesting discussion because the patient was young with low-risk disease. The panel’s conversation centered around the early use of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib (Jakafi) to potentially improve this patient’s overall survival outcome, Klisovic details.

Ruxolitinib has demonstrated superiority over placebo and best available therapy in the phase 3 COMFORT-I (NCT00952289) and COMFORT-II studies (NCT00934544). However, it was noted in the conversation that this patient would not have qualified for enrollment in the COMFORT studies due to his low-risk disease status, Klisovic explains. This led to a debate about the appropriateness of initiating treatment earlier rather than later, even in patients who may not otherwise require immediate therapy, according to Klisovic.

Another key question raised was whether ruxolitinib is truly disease-modifying, particularly in a younger patient, Klisovic says. This is a crucial consideration because the long-term benefits of a therapy and its potential for altering the disease course are significant factors in deciding early intervention, she expands.

Additionally, there was a strong recommendation to monitor this patient closely for transplant potential given his age, Klisovic continues. Although this patient’s molecular profile was not presented, discussants highlighted molecular stratification as an important factor for guiding treatment decision-making in similar cases, she states. Klisovic adds that the identification of higher-risk mutations could alter the treatment trajectory and influence whether early intervention or watchful waiting is more appropriate.

Read more

Mascarenhas on the SENTRY Trial Design and Goals

Posted on by

J

By John Mascarenhas, MD

John Mascarenhas, MD, professor, medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai, director, Center of Excellence for Blood Cancers and Myeloid Disorders, member, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai, discusses the methods, design, and inclusion criteria of the phase 3 SENTRY trial (NCT04562389) for patients with JAK inhibitor treatment-naive myelofibrosis.

SENTRY is a global, multicenter, phase 1/3 study where investigators are assessing the efficacy and safety of selinexor (Xpovio) combined with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) in this patient population.

According to Mascarenhas, the primary end points of phase 3 of the trial include the proportion of patients with spleen volume reduction of greater than or equal to 35% at week 24 (SVR35), and the proportion of patients with a total symptom score reduction of greater than or equal to 50% at week 24 (TSS50), as measured by the myelofibrosis symptom assessment form V4.0.

Read more

Ph- MPN in Adolescent and Young Adult Patients

Posted on by

June 26, 2024

Elizabeth L. Courville, MD

England JT, Szuber N, Sirhan S, et al. Clinical features and long-term outcomes of a pan-Canadian cohort of adolescents and young adults with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a Canadian MPN group study. Leukemia. 2024;38(3):570-578.

The classical BCR:: ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph- MPNs) polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are typically diseases of older adults, with a median age at diagnosis within the sixth decade of life. In two large case series from cancer centers in the United States, adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients were reported to account for 11 to 12% of the Ph- MPNs evaluated.1,2  The data on AYA patients with Ph- MPNs is less robust than that available for their older counterparts, and this patient population may not be represented in cohorts used to develop prognostic scoring systems.

Recently, James T. England, MD, MSc, and colleagues investigated the clinical features and long-term outcomes of a cohort of 609 patients (17 pediatric patients aged <18 years and 592 patients aged 18-45 years) with Ph- MPNs from across eight participating centers in Canada. Initial diagnoses are shown in Figure 1. Clinical features from the current study cohort are compared with those of a 2018 Mayo Clinic AYA cohort1  (Table). The patients were diagnosed between 2000 and 2022, with MPN driver mutation analysis performed in 89% and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of clinically relevant myeloid genes performed in 48%. More than one-third of patients (211) had NGS testing first performed during initial disease phase, with a median time from diagnosis of 3.9 years (range, 0-29 years). Sixty-four patients had NGS first performed during the post-ET/post-PV secondary myelofibrosis (SMF) phase, while 19 had NGS first performed during the accelerated phase (AP)/blast phase (BP) of disease. Non-MPN driver mutations were detected in a higher proportion of patients evaluated during disease progression (secondary myelofibrosis or elevated blasts) than during initial disease phase, including more frequent high molecular risk (HMR) mutations (Figure 2). Mutations defined as HMR included pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2, TP53, and U2AF1Q157. Among those patients with NGS testing performed during the initial disease phase, additional mutations were most frequently detected in those with overt PMF (26%).

Read more

Allogeneic HSCT for Myelofibrosis: What to Know as More Patients Receive Treatment

Posted on by

June 25, 2024

Due to new transplant approaches, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is now perceived as a safer therapeutic option in patients with myelofibrosis, even among older patients. Authors of a review published in the American Journal of Hematology emphasized the crucial role of early consideration and implementation of HSCT in improving clinical outcomes in this patient population.

Despite the approval of new therapies and “various other exciting non-transplant treatments in development, allogeneic HSCT remains at present the only curative therapy for patients with myelofibrosis,” wrote coauthors Haris Ali, MD, and Andrea Bacigalupo, MD.

The challenges associated with treating myelofibrosis include transplant-related mortality and the risk for relapse after HSCT. The authors aimed to provide a comprehensive review of current clinical data, new transplant platforms, and clinical updates, which can enhance patient outcomes.

“The number of patients undergoing an allogeneic HSCT annually is steadily increasing,” Dr. Ali and Dr. Bacigalupo wrote. “This reflects the fact that HSCT has become safer with the reduction in non-relapse mortality over the years, making the choice of an HSCT more attractive among hematologists caring for [patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms].”

Read more

Are thrombosis, progression, and survival in ET predictable?

Posted on by

June 25, 2024

Ghaith Abu-Zeinah, Katie Erdos, Neville Lee, Ahamed Lebbe, Imane Bouhali, Mohammed Khalid, Richard T. Silver & Joseph M. Scandura

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that originates from a hematopoietic stem cell harboring a mutated JAK2, CALR, or MPL gene, or none of these three mutations (10–15% are “triple negative”). Although considered the most indolent MPN, ET is linked to burdensome vasomotor symptoms, and potentially fatal complications that include thrombosis, hemorrhage, and disease progression to myelofibrosis and aggressive myeloid neoplasms. Prognostic measures to identify those at greatest risk for thrombosis, progression, and death in ET (events) are important for timely risk-adapted intervention with available treatments, and for development of interventional trials to improve event-free survival (EFS). But predicting risks of events in ET has been difficult because ET is an uncommon and clinically heterogenous chronic disease. Predicting progression and excess mortality is even more challenging because these events typically occur decades after ET diagnosis [1]. Thus, retrospective analysis of large cohorts with sufficiently long follow-up is required to identify prognostic measures to stratify risk in patients with ET.

Prognostic models have been developed to assess the risk of thrombosis (IPSET-thrombosis [2]) or overall survival (OS) in ET (IPSET-survival [3], MIPSS-ET [4], and triple A [AAA] [5]). This journal recently published two large retrospective ET cohorts: Gangat et al. at the Mayo Clinic (Mayo) [6] and Loscocco et al. at the Florence Center Research and Innovation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (CRIMM) [7]. Both studies confirmed previously identified risk factors for thrombosis, progression and/or death in ET that include older age (Age ≥ 60), male sex, elevated white blood cell count (WBC > 11 × 109/L), elevated absolute neutrophil count (ANC ≥ 8 × 109/L), and low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC < 1.7 × 109/L) at the time of presentation. We evaluated these parameters and current risk models in our cohort of 328 adult patients with ET treated at the Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) Silver MPN Center over a median follow-up of 6 years [8]. This cohort was rigorously defined according to the 2022 World Health Organization diagnostic criteria and therefore all patients had a diagnostic bone marrow biopsy and had alternative diagnoses scrupulously ruled out. The methods of data collection, retrieval, and analysis used were previously described [9], and cohort characteristics are included in Supplementary Table 1.

Read more

Outcomes of the Myelofibrosis Symptom Tracking Survey

Posted on by

We would like to thank the 147 patients who responded to a survey that targeted how people with
Myelofibrosis tracked their symptoms and then how they used the information they gleaned from
their tracking. You’ll never guess what we found.

Nearly 65 percent of respondents said they had never tracked their symptoms. When asked why,
a piece of the MF story unfolded. Some people acknowledged that the variability of both the
symptoms and their occurrence made it difficult to track, while others felt that bringing a focus to
their MF and symptoms each day undermined their mental health. A few mentioned that they
made mental notes of their symptoms, had their various doctors tracking symptoms, or just knew
innately when something changed. Several felt that there was no reason to track their symptoms,
this may be due in part to responses to another question that revealed only around 20 percent of
individuals were encouraged by their physician to keep track of their symptoms. Of those that
did track their symptoms, most did so with their own personal pen-and-paper accounting and
used a variety of approaches using numerical scales, happy and sad faces, or a more journaling
style.

After opening this little window into the MF experience. It was hard not to have additional
questions. For example, could symptom tracking be used as both a self-care practice and a tool of
empowerment? Ultimately, the tools and techniques that are most helpful come from the insight
and strength of those who experience MF every day. If symptom tracking is not the best way to
track symptoms to possibly share with your personal health care team, or the team you work with
during a clinical trial, what does work for you? We would love to learn more, and share what we
learn to benefit others. If you have a response to these questions or anything more you would like
to say on this topic, please email us at ngiocondo@mpnadvocacy.com.

Prospective Analysis Highlights Patterns of Progression to Myelofibrosis Following Essential Thrombocythemia Diagnosis

Posted on by

June 17, 2024

Author(s): Caroline Seymour

Most patients with essential thrombocythemia (95.7%; 1184/1237) included in an analysis of the prospective, observational MOST study (NCT02953704) did not experience disease progression to myelofibrosis, but those who did were found to have had longer duration of disease, higher white blood cell counts, and lower hemoglobin levels at enrollment, according to findings presented at the 2024 EHA Congress.1

Of the 4.3% (n = 53) of patients who progressed to myelofibrosis, a pathologic diagnosis of the disease or grade 2 or greater fibrosis was the most common indicator (49.1%; n = 26) of disease progression, followed by new or worsening splenomegaly coupled with a combination of high white blood cell counts and low hemoglobin levels and platelet counts (22.6%; n = 12). Additional indicators were death from myelofibrosis, myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or acute myeloid leukemia (AML; 11.3%; n = 6) and circulating blasts above 1% with new or worsening splenomegaly (5.7%; n = 3); patients also met at least 2 progression criteria (11.3%; n = 6).

“These findings and further analyses of MOST data will add insight into disease progression in patients with essential thrombocythemia and facilitate clinical management of this patient population,” lead study author Ruben A. Mesa, MD, FACP, president and executive director of Atrium Health Levine Cancer Institute and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, and vice dean of cancer programs at Wake Forest University School of Medicine in Charlotte, North Carolina, and coauthors wrote in the poster.

Read more

Disease Duration, Elevated WBC Count, and VAF Predict Disease Progression in Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

June 14, 2024

Author(s): Megan Hollasch

Time from diagnosis to enrollment, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and variant allele frequency (VAF) were significantly associated with an increased risk of disease progression among patients with polycythemia vera (PV), according to data from the phase 4 prospective, observational REVEAL study (NCT02252159) presented at the 2024 EHA Congress by Michael R. Grunwald, MD.

“Five predictors of PV progression were identified: disease duration, thrombotic event [TE] history, WBC count of greater than 11 × 109/L, hematocrit [HCT] level of 0.45 L/L or lower, and VAF. However, HCT [level] of 0.45 L/L or lower may be confounded by disease duration and cytoreductive treatment covariates. These results provide additional support for the use of disease duration and elevated WBC and VAF as risk factors for disease progression, and identify history of TEs as a potential novel risk factor,” Grunwald and coauthors wrote in a poster presentation of the findings. Grunwald is chief of the Leukemia Division at Atrium Health’s Levine Cancer Institute and director of the Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program at Levine Cancer Institute in Charlotte, North Carolina.

At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, findings from REVEAL, the largest prospective, observational clinical study in patients with PV to date (n = 2023), showed that 6.7% of patients progressed to myelofibrosis (MF). Results from a univariate analysis of patients with vs without progression revealed that significant covariates consisted of time from PV diagnosis to enrollment (OR, 1.065; 95% CI, 1.040-1.090; P < .0001), history of TEs (yes vs no; OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.170-2.534; P = .0059), HCT levels of 0.45 L/L or lower (>0.45 vs ≤0.45 L/L; OR, 0.593; 95% CI, 0.410-0.858; P = .0056), and white blood cell (WBC) count of greater than 11 × 109/L at enrollment (>11 vs ≤11 × 109/L; OR, 2.053; 95% CI, 1.445-2.918; P < .0001).

Read more