The NUTRIENT Trial (NUTRitional Intervention among myEloproliferative Neoplasms): Results from a Randomized Phase I Pilot Study for Feasibility and Adherence
Laura F. Mendez Luque1,2, Julio Avelar-Barragan3, Hellen Nguyen1, Jenny Nguyen1, Eli M. Soyfer1, Jiarui Liu1, Jane H. Chen1, Nitya Mehrotra1, Xin (Helen) Huang1, Heidi E. Kosiorek4, Amylou Dueck4, Alexander Himstead1, Elena Heide1, Melinda Lem1, Kenza El Alaoui1, Eduard Mas1, Robyn M. Scherber5, Ruben A. Mesa6, Katrine L. Whiteson3, Andrew Odegaard1, Angela G. Fleischman1
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Chronic inflammation is integral to Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) pathogenesis. JAK inhibitors reduce cytokine levels, but not without significant side effects. Nutrition is a low- risk approach to reduce inflammation and ameliorate symptoms in MPN. We performed a randomized, parallel-arm study to determine the feasibility of an education-focused Mediterranean diet intervention among MPN patients.
Addition of Parsaclisib to Ruxolitinib Decreases Spleen Volume and Improves Symptom Scores Among Patients With Myelofibrosis
The addition of parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib treatment decreased spleen volume, improved symptom scores, and yielded acceptable safety among patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis (MF), according to findings from a phase 2 trial published in Blood Advances.
Abdulraheem Yacoub, MD, The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, and coauthors explained that although ruxolitinib has demonstrated beneficial results among patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelofibrosis, “suboptimal response may occur, potentially because of signaling via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B pathway.”
In this phase 2 trial, the study authors aimed to measure the potential benefit of adding PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib to ruxolitinib treatment among patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who did not have optimal responses to ruxolitinib alone. The primary end points were dosing, efficacy, and safety of this treatment combination.
All patients included in this study stayed on a stable dose of ruxolitinib. Among these patients, 32 were administered parsaclisib at 10 or 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks, then once weekly afterward (daily-to-weekly dosing). Additionally, 42 patients were administered parsaclisib at 5 or 20 mg once daily for 8 weeks, and then 5 mg once daily afterward (all-daily dosing).
Study shows early success of a novel drug in treating a rare and chronic blood cancer
February 21, 2024
by The Mount Sinai Hospital
A novel treatment for polycythemia vera, a potentially fatal blood cancer, demonstrated the ability to control overproduction of red blood cells, the hallmark of this malignancy and many of its debilitating symptoms in a multi-center clinical trial led by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
In the phase 2 study, the drug rusfertide limited excess production of red blood cells, the main manifestation of polycythemia vera, over the 28-week course of treatment. The results suggest it could replace therapeutic phlebotomy, a common form of treatment which has proven to be a burden for many patients. The results of the study were published today (Feb. 21) in The New England Journal of Medicine.
“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” says Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Medicine (Hematology and Medical Oncology) at Icahn Mount Sinai and lead author of the study.
Clinical Review of Pegylated Interferons Suggests Formulation and Mechanism of Action May Improve Outcomes for MPN Patients
Interferons in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms
Pankit Vachhani, John Mascarenhas , Prithviraj Bose , Gabriela Hobbs, Abdulraheem Yacoub, Jeanne M. Palmer , Aaron T. Gerds, Lucia Masarova, Andrew T. Kuykendall, Raajit K. Rampal, Ruben Mesa and Srdan Verstovsek
Abstract: Interferons are cytokines with immunomodulatory properties and disease-modifying effects that have been used to treat myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) for more than 35 years. The initial use of interferons was limited due to difficulties with administration and a significant toxicity profile. Many of these shortcomings were addressed by covalently binding polyethylene glycol to the interferon structure, which increases the stability, prolongs activity, and reduces immunogenicity of the molecule. In the current therapeutic landscape, pegylated interferons are recommended for use in the treatment of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. We review recent efficacy, molecular response, and safety data for the two available pegylated interferons, peginterferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi). The practical management of interferonbased therapies is discussed, along with our opinions on whether to and how to switch from hydroxyurea to one of these therapies. Key topics and questions related to use of interferons, such as their safety and tolerability, the significance of variant allele frequency, advantages of early treatment, and what the future of interferon therapy may look like, will be examined. Pegylated interferons represent an important therapeutic option for patients with MPNs; however, more research is still required to further refine interferon therapy.
Navigating Cytoreduction in MPNs: Benefits, Risks, and Considerations
In an interview with Targeted Oncology, Douglas Tremblay, MD, discussed the significance of cytoreductive therapy in mitigating thrombotic risk in myeloproliferative neoplasms.
According to Douglas Tremblay, MD, cytoreductive therapy has emerged with a pivotal role in mitigating thrombotic risk in the treatment landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), specifically essential thrombocytopenia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV).
Despite the evident benefits, each therapy carries unique adverse effects, requiring the careful consideration of patient-specific factors in treatment administration. Deciding when to initiate cytoreductive therapy in patients with chronic MPNs relies on accurate risk assessment, with parameters such as age and prior thrombotic events often guiding treatment decisions.
Frontline therapies, such as hydroxyurea and interferon, manage blood counts for patients with ET and PV, and newer options are emerging, according to Tremblay, assistant professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. However, the long-term implications focus on thrombosis prevention and disease progression.
Ongoing research endeavors aim to delve deeper into surrogate end points and novel therapeutic avenues, promising to further refine and revolutionize the management of MPNs.
In an interview with Targeted OncologyTM, Tremblay discussed the significance of cytoreductive therapy in mitigating thrombotic risk in MPNs, specifically ET and PV.
JAK-STAT Pathway–Targeting Approaches in Myelofibrosis Are Evolving
During a Targeted Oncology™ Case-Based Roundtable™ event, Raajit K. Rampal, MD, gave an overview of the classification, risk assessment, and current therapy options for patients with myelofibrosis.
RAAJIT K. RAMPAL, MD, PHD: Nothing has changed in terms of the 2022 [World Health Organization] classification, unlike what has happened with myelodysplastic syndrome.1 JAK-STAT signaling is a hallmark of MPN pathogenesis, and all of the mutations that we’re aware of at the moment—JAK2, CALR [calreticulin], and MPL—function in the JAK-STAT pathway. MPL is the thrombopoietin receptor which complexes with JAK [Janus kinase].
CALR is interesting, because CALR was discovered in 2013 but we think at the moment CALR complexes with MPL and results in the aberrant activation of MPL, but CALR does traffic to the cell surface.2,3 That makes it a target for immunotherapy. That is the target of a couple of clinical trials; one is open [LIMBER (NCT06034002)] and the other is about to open, which is really interesting [and] could change everything in MPNs.
All that being said, there are still at least 8% to 15% of myelofibrosis cases that are “triple negative.”2,3 If you look at those cases by gene expression profiling, they have the JAK-STAT signature. The issue with those cases is that we haven’t identified the particular lesion that occurs there, but it is a JAK-STAT–activated lesion, regardless of what the actual driver is. Those are the important things to think about with regards to how the disease is driven.
JNJ-88549968 by Johnson & Johnson for Essential Thrombocythemia: Likelihood of Approval
JNJ-88549968 is under clinical development by Johnson & Johnson and currently in Phase I for Essential Thrombocythemia. According to GlobalData, Phase I drugs for Essential Thrombocythemia does not have sufficient historical data to build an indication benchmark PTSR for Phase I. GlobalData uses proprietary data and analytics to create drugs-specific PTSR and LoA in the JNJ-88549968 LoA Report.
GlobalData tracks drug-specific phase transition and likelihood of approval scores, in addition to indication benchmarks based off 18 years of historical drug development data. Attributes of the drug, company and its clinical trials play a fundamental role in drug-specific PTSR and likelihood of approval.
JNJ-88549968 overview
JNJ-88549968 is under development for the treatment of calreticulin (CALR)-mutated myeloproliferative neoplasms, essential thrombocythemia, neoplasms, leukemia and myelofibrosis. The therapeutic candidate is a bispecific antibody acts by targeting calreticulin and CD3.