Claire Harrison, MD, DM, FRCP, FRCPath is a Professor of Hematology at the Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in London, UK. Prof. Harrison became a Consultant at the Guy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in 2001, where she is now a Clinical Director.
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Women’s History Month – Gabriela Hobbs, MD
Dr. Hobbs is the clinical director of the adult leukemia service at Massachusetts General Hospital. Her clinical and research interests are myeloproliferative neoplasms and chronic myeloid leukemia.
1.How did you become interested in hematology versus other areas of medicine?
I’ve been drawn to hematology my whole life. My first real awareness of this was when I read a children’s book about Louis Pasteur and his search for a vaccine for rabies asa young child. The idea that we had soldiers (aka immune cells) in our body that could be used to fight illness was simply fascinating. I remember staring at my hands and trying to see if I could catch a glimpse of one of these bad germs.
2.What have been the highlights in your career, specifically in the area of MPNs?
One huge highlight was when I was hired at MGH to develop a clinical and research program for MPN patients as MGH. Another, more recent highlight was when I had the opportunity to present results of a clinical trial I lead investigating the role of ruxolitinib before, during and after transplant for myelofibrosis. The outcomes with this approach have been excellent and I feel excited to be able to have contributed to improving outcomes for MF patients. Lastly, I love being a mentor and helping trainees through their journey as clinicians and researchers, I recently saw one of my mentee’s get her first faculty position and it was a very rewarding experience.
3. As a female in this area of medicine, what advice would you give women grappling with career choices in hematology and medical research?
When I was in training I remember feeling intimidated by a career in hematologic malignancies and thought that maintaining work life balance would be difficult. However, I quickly realized that if I didn’t pursue a field of medicine that I was passionate, I would never be satisfied with work and honestly, there is no such thing as an easy career in medicine. What I tell my mentees is, choose something you love so that you are excited to go to work every day but don’t be afraid to set boundaries between work and life, this will ensure your career success by allowing you to stay in medicine longer and avoid burn out.
Women’s History Month-Wendy Erber, MD
Professor Wendy Erber is Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and a diagnostic haematologist at the University of Western Australia.
1. How did you become interested in hematology versus other areas of medicine?
My interest in hematology was driven by a passion to understand the cause of blood diseases. If we understand causation, we may have a better chance of accurate diagnosis, targeted treatments and (possibly) prevention. I had the opportunity to learn from and study under the supervision of a wonderful scientist cum diagnostic hematologist at the University of Oxford. His passion for the field was infectious, and I continued on from 4 stimulating years under his guidance. His mentorship was a key component that led me down this career path. There is another answer I could give. You will find it on my TEDx talk: https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=BcjVx8LtCqM
2. What have been the highlights in your career, specifically in the area of MPNs?
My career highlights in the field of MPNs have included contributing to our knowledge of the importance of the JAK2 gene. My role in assessing the bone marrow pathology informed patient diagnoses and their care. JAK2 testing was then introduced as a routine and this has helped discriminate between reactive causes of thrombocytosis and MPN. This has been a paradigm shift in diagnosis that has benefited patients and their care.
3. As a female in this area of medicine, what advice would you give women grappling with career choices in hematology and medical research?
Follow your passion. Work with the best you can. Take opportunities when they arise. And, if you do these things, you are likely to enjoy your career and be successful. You may have failures along the way: we all do! But if you don’t try, you’ll never succeed!
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Update Recommends BESREMi® (ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft) for the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera
Reflecting its strong clinical profile and broad label, NCCN Guidelines include BESREMi as an
option for PV regardless of treatment history, and for use in both low- and high-risk settings
March 2, 2022, Burlington, MA – PharmaEssentia USA Corporation, the U.S. subsidiary of PharmaEssentia Corporation (TPEx:6446), a global biopharmaceutical innovator based in Taiwan leveraging deep expertise and proven scientific principles to deliver new biologics in
hematology and oncology, today announced that the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) has been updated to include BESREMi® (ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft) as a recommended therapeutic option for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera (PV).
The NCCN is a highly renowned and respected not-for-profit alliance of leading cancer centers in the United States. Its treatment practice guidelines are widely respected and followed by the U.S. physician community, and serve to inform and facilitate coverage decisions with payers for oncology therapies. Consistent with the broad indication for BESREMi upon its U.S. regulatory approval in November 2021, the guidelines provide consideration for use of the treatment among both high-risk and low-risk adult patients, regardless of their treatment history.
“Importantly, the NCCN Guidelines update includes mention of BESREMi in multiple settings, and in particular, as the only systemic option for low-risk patients with PV, which signals a shift toward more proactive treatment earlier in the disease journey,” said Ruben Mesa, M.D., FACP, Executive Director of the UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center. “Now, treating physicians can leverage these expert guidelines to gain greater familiarity with BESREMi in the real world setting and understand its broad utility for patient care in a variety of treatment settings.”
“Our goal with BESREMi has been to offer a compelling therapeutic alternative to conventional treatment options that can enable physicians to gain durable control over the disease beyond the symptoms and help more patients reach their long-term health goals,” said Raymond
Urbanski, M.D., Ph.D., U.S. Head of Clinical Development and Medical Affairs. “The NCCN Guidelines update just three months following our approval illustrates the community’s recognition of the strong potential of BESREMi in PV care.”
Myelofibrosis market to see new approvals in 2022, driving market growth
Myelofibrosis is a rare hematological malignancy with limited therapeutic options and significant unmet clinical need. Current first line therapy options are two Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKis), Incyte’s Jakavi/Jakafi (ruxolitinib) and Impact Biomedicine’s Inrebic (fedratinib). Jakafi has dominated the myelofibrosis market since its launch in 2011 and has seen lucrative financial returns, achieving blockbuster status. However, Jakafi is not a curative agent. Since patients often discontinue the treatment and experience exacerbated anemia, clinicians prescribe additional lines of therapy. Several pipeline JAKis have entered Phase III trials, seeking to expand the lines of therapy by targeting Jakafi-refractory patients, capitalizing on a currently underserved patient population.
Notably, topline data have recently been released from the randomized, double-blind, active control Phase III MOMENTUM study comparing the selective JAK1, JAK2 and ACVR1 inhibitor, Sierra Oncology’s momelotinib, versus the anti-anemia molecule danazol. In Jakafi-refractory patients, momelotinib achieved all prespecified primary and secondary endpoints. A total of 25% (n=130) of patients experienced a total symptom score (TSS) reduction of ≥50% on momelotinib, demonstrating clear superiority to danazol (TSS reduction ≥50% in 9% of patients). Momelotinib was also superior in splenic response rate (SRR) compared to danazol (23% versus 3%) and demonstrated promising safety data with 54% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicities, compared to 65% on danazol.
Prevalence of Frailty in Patients With MPNs Linked to Subtype
Frailty is a common feature among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and may be associated with MPN subtype, according to the results of a study recently published in the journal Leukemia Research.
“Due to MPN-related symptoms and decreased physiologic reserve, physical frailty may be prevalent in this population,” the study investigators explained in their report.
The findings came from an analysis of the prospective Ontario Registry of Chronic Hematologic Malignancies and Incident Cardiovascular Disease (ORCHID) study, which is ongoing. Patients in this analysis were enrolled within a year of diagnosis. Represented diagnoses included chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), primary myelofibrosis (PMF), polycythemia vera (PV), and essential thrombocythemia (ET).
Evaluation of frailty prevalence and trends was the goal of the study, and frailty was assessed through a combination of patient self-reports, review of electronic medical records, and standardized physical measurements. Patients were grouped across 3 frailty categories: frail, prefrail, or not frail, based on a series of metrics.
The analysis included 156 patients, of whom 60 patients had CML, 51 had PV, 16 had PMF, and 29 had ET. The ratio of females to males was reportedly balanced across subtypes, although within the PMF subgroup, 75% of patients were female. The mean age for the overall population was 63 years.
More than half of the patients overall (57%) were considered to have prefrail status, one-fourth (25%) were categorized as frail, and 18% were deemed to be not frail. Across MPN subtypes, PMF showed the greatest association with frailty, while ET was the least associated with it. Age was also associated with frailty.
The researchers identified possible differences in features associated with frailty across MPN subtypes. For instance, PMF appeared to be linked to unintentional weight loss more often than PV and ET.
“Although these results cannot be directly compared to control populations without MPNs, this study suggests that patients with MPNs may have a higher burden of frailty compared to the general population,” the researchers reported.
Learn more
Higher Symptom Burden More Likely to Improve With MPN Treatment
By Vicki Moore, PhD
Higher Symptom Burden More Likely to Improve With MPN Treatment
Data from 2 clinical trials involving patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) revealed the importance of considering symptom burden in evaluating treatment efficacy and tolerability. The study results were published in The Lancet Haematology.
The analysis included data from the single-arm phase 2 MPN-RC 111 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01259817) and from the randomized, open-label phase 3 MPN-RC 112 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01258856). MPN-RC 111 evaluated clinical-hematologic response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a in patients who had hydroxyurea resistance or intolerance. MPN-RC 112 evaluated clinical-hematologic response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a in comparison with hydroxyurea in treatment-naïve patients who had high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) or polycythemia vera (PV).
This analysis made use of results from patient questionnaires including the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) and the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire. The objective of the analysis was to analyze symptom burden with respect to both the clinical-hematologic response at 12-months and the baseline symptom burden.
Symptom burden was categorized as either high (total symptom score ≥20) or low (total symptom score <20). The researchers considered a clinically significant improvement in symptom burden to be an improvement of 50% or more in MPN-SAF total symptom score over 12 months for patients who had a nonzero total symptom score at baseline.
There were 114 patients analyzed from the MPN-RC 111 study (64 with ET, 50 with PV) and 166 patients (79 with ET, 87 with PV) from the MPN-RC 112 study. Among patients from the MPN-RC 111 study, 32% of complete responders and 20% of partial responders reported clinically significant improvements in symptom burden at 12 months.
For patients from the MPN-RC 112 study, among those treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a, 19% of complete responders and 18% of partial responders reported a clinically significant improvement in symptom burden at 12 months. Of those treated with hydroxyurea, this outcome was reported in 27% of complete responders and 22% of partial responders.
Overall, responders — complete or partial — more often experienced a clinically significant improvement than did nonresponders (22% and 5%, respectively; P =.0003). However, the study investigators noted that most responders did not report a clinically significant improvement.
Additionally, patients who had a high symptom burden at baseline showed improvements in symptom burden at both 3 and 12 months, whether treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a or hydroxyurea, with mean symptom score changes of -10.2 for pegylated interferon alfa-2a and -6.8 for hydroxyurea. Patients with low baseline symptom burden, however, experienced worse symptom burden at these time points. Mean symptom score changes were 3.2 with pegylated interferon alfa-2a and 3.4 with hydroxyurea for these patients.
“In summary, clinicians, researchers, and regulatory agencies should consider symptom burden and quality of life when evaluating treatment efficacy in patients with essential thrombocythaemia and polycythaemia vera,” they concluded.
Disclosures: Some authors declared affiliations with biotech, pharmaceutical, and/or device companies. Please see the original reference for a full list of authors’ disclosures.
Sierra Oncology Announces Momelotinib Achieved Statistically Significant Benefit on Symptoms, Anemia and Splenic Size in the Pivotal MOMENTUM Study for Myelofibrosis
—New Drug Application submission planned for second quarter of 2022—
—Full data set to be presented at an upcoming medical meeting—
SAN MATEO, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Sierra Oncology, Inc. (NASDAQ: SRRA), a late-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to delivering targeted therapies for rare cancers, today announced positive topline data from the pivotal Phase 3 MOMENTUM study—a global, randomized, double-blind clinical trial evaluating momelotinib (MMB) in myelofibrosis patients who are symptomatic and anemic and previously treated with an approved JAK inhibitor. The trial met all of its primary and key secondary endpoints.
“These data are extremely exciting and everything we had hoped to see from the trial,” said Stephen Dilly, MBBS, PhD, President and Chief Executive Officer of Sierra Oncology. “To achieve statistically significant and clinically important efficacy across all prespecified primary and key secondary endpoints while maintaining platelet counts in such a difficult to treat patient population is remarkable, and a confirmation of the anemia response we identified in the comprehensive review of our previous Phase 3 studies.”
Topline data announced based on 195 patients (MMB n = 130; DAN n = 65) include:
- Primary Endpoint of Total Symptom Score (TSS) of >50%: 25% in the MMB arm vs. 9% in the control arm (p=0.0095)
- Secondary Endpoint of Transfusion Independence (TI): 31% in the MMB arm vs. 20% in the control arm (one-sided p=0.0064; non-inferiority)
- Secondary Endpoint of Splenic Response Rate (SRR) >35%: 23% in the MMB arm vs. 3% in the control arm (p=0.0006)
- The rate of Grade 3 or worse adverse events in the randomized treatment period was 54% in the MMB arm and 65% in the control arm. Serious treatment emergent adverse events were 35% in the MMB arm and 40% in the control arm.
- Mean baseline characteristics for all patients were TSS of 27, Hemoglobin (Hgb) of 8 g/dL and platelet count of 145 x 10 9/L
- The full data set will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting
“As a clinician, I am thrilled to see data that confirm the potential of momelotinib as a treatment option for myelofibrosis patients who are anemic or at risk of becoming anemic,” said Ruben Mesa, MD, FACP, Executive Director of the Mays Cancer Center, home to UT Health San Antonio, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and co-Principal Investigator of the study. “Anemia of myelofibrosis is strongly correlated with reduced quality of life and a decrease in overall survival. Half of all myelofibrosis patients present with anemia at diagnosis and virtually all become anemic over time. With currently approved therapies being myelosuppressive, it’s wonderful to know that we may soon have such an effective treatment option for these patients.”
Barbara Klencke, MD, Chief Medical Officer of Sierra Oncology, stated, “We are committed to working tirelessly to bring momelotinib to patients as quickly as possible. We would like to thank the patients and investigators who participated in this study and look forward to presenting the full data set at an upcoming medical meeting.”
Conference Call & Webcast
In connection with this announcement, Sierra will host a conference call and webcast on Tuesday, January 25, 2022, at 8:00 am ET. The call may be accessed by calling (833) 927-1758 (Toll-free in North America) or +1 (929) 526-1599 (International Dial-in) and entering the Conference ID number: 007608. The call will be webcast live and will be accessible through the Investor section of the Company’s website at www.SierraOncology.com. An archived replay of the webcast will be made available at the same location.About Momelotinib
Momelotinib is a potent, selective and orally bioavailable JAK1, JAK2 and ACVR1 / ALK2 inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of myelofibrosis in symptomatic, anemic patients previously treated with an approved JAK inhibitor. More than 1,200 subjects have received momelotinib since clinical studies began in 2009, including approximately 1,000 patients treated for myelofibrosis, several of whom remain on treatment for over 11 years. Momelotinib is the first and only JAK inhibitor to demonstrate positive data for all key hallmarks of the disease—symptoms, splenic response and anemia.About Myelofibrosis
Myelofibrosis is a rare blood cancer that results from dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling and is characterized by constitutional symptoms, splenomegaly (enlarged spleen) and progressive anemia. From prior studies with momelotinib, we know approximately half of myelofibrosis patients are moderately to severely anemic when eligible for JAK inhibitor treatment. Furthermore, currently approved JAK inhibitors only address symptoms and splenomegaly and are myelosuppressive. This can lead to worsening anemia, resulting in dose reductions that potentially reduce treatment effect.About the Pivotal MOMENTUM Clinical Trial
MOMENTUM is a global, randomized, double-blind Phase 3 clinical trial of momelotinib versus danazol in patients with myelofibrosis who were symptomatic and anemic, and had been previously treated with an FDA-approved JAK inhibitor. The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of momelotinib for the treatment and reduction of the key hallmarks of disease: symptoms, blood transfusions (due to anemia) and splenomegaly (enlarged spleen).The primary endpoint of the study is Total Symptom Score (TSS) reduction of >50% over the 28 days immediately prior to the end of Week 24 compared to baseline TSS, using the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF). Secondary endpoints included Transfusion Independence (TI) rate for >12 weeks immediately prior to the end of Week 24 with Hgb levels ≥ 8 g/dL, and Splenic Response Rate (SRR) based on splenic volume reduction of >35% at Week 24. The study enrolled 195 patients based on a planned 180 patients across 21 countries.
Danazol was selected as the treatment comparator given its use to ameliorate anemia in patients with myelofibrosis, as recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines. Patients were randomized 2:1 (MMB n = 130 and DAN n = 65) to receive either momelotinib or danazol. After 24 weeks of treatment, patients on danazol were allowed to crossover to receive momelotinib. Early cross-over to momelotinib was available for confirmed symptomatic splenic progression.
About Sierra Oncology
Sierra Oncology is a late-stage biopharmaceutical company on a mission to deliver targeted therapies that treat rare forms of cancer. We harness our deep scientific expertise to identify compounds that target the root cause of disease to advance targeted therapies with assets on the leading edge of cancer biology. Our team takes an evidence-based approach to understand the limitations of current treatments and explore new ways to change the cancer treatment paradigm. Together we are transforming promise into patient impact.For more information, visit www.SierraOncology.com.
Cautionary Note on Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, but not limited to, statements regarding Sierra Oncology’s expectations regarding the regulatory timeline, presentation of the results of the MOMENTUM trial, commercialization and future success of momelotinib, the company’s potential opportunity in myelofibrosis, the company’s ability to identify compounds and statements by the company’s Chief Medical Officer and the Executive Director of the Mays Cancer Center. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, among others, the factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” set forth in Sierra Oncology’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. Sierra Oncology undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained herein or to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof, other than as may be required by applicable law.View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/
news/home/20220125005390/en/