With the increase in incidence and prevalence of myeloid neoplasms in India, it has become a necessity to understand its molecular mechanisms, acquisition of genomic alterations, and understand its primary and secondary resistance pathways which ultimately impact the decision of therapeutics. The objective of this review is to investigate the molecular aspects of this disease type and identify the biomarkers that help with diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis, and selecting the best line of treatment for a speci icmyeloid neoplasm. Advancements and innovations in molecular technologies from simplest Real-Time PCR to high throughput next-generation sequencing have played a vital role in screening the most common mutations and fusions to the novel and rare. Molecular technologies have helped to enumerate the genomic landscape of myeloid malignancies. The understanding of both- the mechanisms and the technology is a strong combination as it has helped revolutionize precision oncology and helped in giving better therapeutic choices with better clinical outcomes. The importance of cellular morphology, clinical symptoms, and molecular pathology in assessing the risk of myeloid malignancies is emphasized and summarized in the review. The review concludes that understanding molecular pathogenesis can be improved by using clinical-pathological-molecular strategies for diagnosis and therapy decision-making.
Category Archives: Research
Understanding Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Young Patients: A Comprehensive Study
Insights into Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Young Patients
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of diseases in which the bone marrow makes too many red blood cells, white blood cells, or platelets. A recent study involving 609 patients diagnosed with Philadelphia chromosome-negative MPNs at the age of 45 or younger has brought new insights into the understanding of these diseases in younger patients.
Demographics, Clinical Variables, and Management Strategies
The study reported a variety of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables, as well as the management strategies used for these patients. The majority of patients were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). The median follow-up for the cohort was 9.1 years, and germline testing for hereditary MPN was not available.
The Association of Driver Mutation Variant Allele Frequency and Next-Generation Sequencing
The study also investigated the association of driver mutation variant allele frequency (VAF) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) with disease outcomes. This is important as these factors can play a significant role in the progression and management of MPNs.
Abstract WP249: Risk for Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke is Increased in Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange and Those With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Abstract
Agent Orange (AO) is a dioxin containing defoliant and carcinogen used in the Korean and Vietnam War. There is limited evidence of the association between AO exposure among Veterans and stroke. Stroke is not yet part of the list of presumptive conditions according to the Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act which provides Veterans and their survivors disability compensation for conditions arising from exposure to AO. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) are uncommon etiologies of stroke but whether AO exposure increases incidence of stroke in MPN has not been described.
Utilizing the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) database, a case-control study was performed from 1/1/2006 – 1/26/2023 on the Veterans from Illinois, the state most representative of the US population. ICD-9 and -10 codes identified Veterans with stroke and MPN. AO exposure was verified on the Veterans’ service duration and location. Qualitative data were compared by chi-square tests.
Among 586,555 Veterans from Illinois, there were 15,455 ischemic stroke (IS), 1,593 hemorrhagic stroke (HS), 2,752 MPN, and 59,393 with AO exposure. Among MPNs, there were 237 IS (41 with AO) and 26 HS (3 with AO). IS and HS were associated with AO exposure, OR 1.34 95% CI 1.28-1.41, p<0.0001, and OR 1.20 95% CI 1.03-1.39, p=0.02, respectively. MPN is associated with IS and HS, OR 3.52, 95% CI 3.08-4.03, and OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.4-5.23, both p<0.0001, respectively. There is no significant association with AO exposure among Veterans with MPN with stroke. Among non-MPN Veterans with AO exposure, there was an earlier median age of IS and HS, 67 vs. 70 and 67 vs. 71, both p<0.0001. There was no difference in median age of stroke among MPN Veterans with or without AO exposure. There were no differences with rates of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, heart failure, and pulmonary hypertension among MPN Veterans with stroke with and without AO exposure.
In conclusion, there is an association of AO exposure with IS and HS with an earlier onset among those exposed. There is a strong association between MPN and stroke independent of AO exposure. The biologic plausibility of endothelial dysfunction and accelerated atherosclerosis from AO exposure warrants further investigation.
Ambitious £4 million project to develop clinical platform for blood cancer prevention
4th Feb 2024 – Edward Pinches
Professor George Vassiliou from the Wellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (CSCI), University of Cambridge will spearhead the project, which focuses on myeloid blood cancers, a group of blood cancers that accounts for more than 11,000 deaths each year in the UK.
The blood cancers, which affect both the bone marrow and blood, include acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and rarer cancers like chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML).
Truong on the Rationale for Investigating ERK2 Substrate Binding Modalities in MPNs
Billy Truong, PhD candidate, Fox Chase Cancer Center, discusses the rationale for investigating the functions of ERK2 substrate binding modalities in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).
Truong and colleagues are conducting research investigating cell signaling programs that are altered in MPNs. Specifically, treatment resistance often arises from the activation of the MAPK pathway, Truong says. Approximately 85% of cancers have genetic modifications in proteins, especially in the RAS protein, which ultimately drive uncontrolled tumor cell proliferation, Truong explains.
Downstream of the MAPK pathway is the ERK2 protein, which is a common target of cancer therapies, Truong notes. However, drugs that target the kinase function of ERK2 are traditionally designed to be nonspecific and are therefore toxic to healthy cells expressing ERK2, Truong emphasizes. Accordingly, drug specificity remains an unmet need for patients with MPNs.
Hobbs Highlights Key Research in Hematologic Malignancies at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting
Ruxolitinib (Jakafi)-based combinations continue to demonstrate promising ability to address splenomegaly and a signal toward improvement of tumor-related symptoms in myelofibrosis. As novel targets for development are unearthed and considered for evaluation in combination with standard JAK inhibition, the assessment of other meaningful end points is necessary to confirm the true benefit of such agents alone or in combination across myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), according to Gabriela Hobbs, MD.
Results from the phase 3 TRANSFORM-1 study (NCT04472598)were presented at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting and demonstrated that up-front navitoclax and ruxolitinib (Jakafi) significantly reduced spleen volume by 35% or more at week 24 vs ruxolitinib plus placebo in patients with myelofibrosis.1 Despite this, no significant difference in total symptom score (TSS) was observed between the arms.
Additionally, data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) showed that pelabresib (CPI-0610) plus ruxolitinib reduced spleen volume by 35% or more in 65.9% of patients with JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis vs 35.2% in those who received placebo/ruxolitinib (95% CI, 21.6-39.3; P < .001). The agent also trended toward improving TSS reduction by 50% (TSS50) at 24 weeks.2
“One of the things we must answer as a field is: What is the benefit of using combination therapy for this disease?” Hobbs, who is clinical director of the Leukemia Service at Massachusetts General Cancer Center, and an assistant in medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, stressed in an interview with OncLive®News Network: On Location during the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting. “We need to have end points that are meaningful, [as well as] therapies that are well tolerated and affordable for patients.”
In the interview, Hobbs discussed the significance of key data from the TRANSFORM-1 and MANIFEST-2 trials for patients with myelofibrosis, expanded on the ongoing or future development of novel targets and potential combination regimens across MPNs, and spotlighted the phase 1/2 SAVE study (NCT05360160) and other key research efforts being made in leukemia.
OncLive: What key data on novel ruxolitinib-based combination regimens were reported at the 2023 ASH Annual Meeting?
Hobbs: I primarily treat MPN, and this is probably the first ASH Meeting where 2 different phase 3 studies [in this space] were presented at the same time. The navitoclax data are impressive, specifically when it comes to the improvement that we see with the combination of navitoclax and ruxolitinib for improving spleen volume response [SVR]. That can be very meaningful for patients—especially those with myelofibrosis who have very large spleens. We saw a very similar SVR with the combination of pelabresib and ruxolitinib as up-front therapy in patients who had not received a JAK inhibitor before.
How do you distinguish between these 2 agents in clinical practice?
In addition to showing an impressive improvement in SVR, neither study showed a dramatic improvement in symptoms [with the combinations] compared with ruxolitinib alone. That’s something that we need to consider. Pelabresib probably did a better job at improving symptoms than navitoclax. However, we need to start thinking about whether there are more meaningful end points other than expecting agents to improve SVR and symptoms. For example, could they potentially delay progression to leukemia, improve overall survival, or improve treatment outcomes in general or after transplant? Those are difficult end points to demonstrate, so they weren’t the primary objectives of the studies.
What other emerging agents of interest were discussed during the meeting?
There were lots of interesting novel agents presented at the meeting. There is a single-agent study [examining] a selective PIM kinase inhibitor and [we saw] some updated results in approximately 30 patients who have received the agent. [The agent appears to be] incredibly well tolerated, with very little impact on blood counts in a group of heavily pretreated patients. We’re also seeing a variety of other agents that are being developed. We’re seeing results from [the phase 2 VALENTINE-PTCL01 (NCT04703192)] study with the LSD1 inhibitor valemetostat tosylate [DS-3201b], an agent that also helps to prevent the development of fibrosis.
Are any of these agents viable options for further investigation as part of combination regimens?
That is the question to answer in [the] MPN [field]. Many studies have focused on combining a novel agent with a JAK inhibitor, primarily with ruxolitinib since it’s the one that has been around for the longest. I wouldn’t be surprised if the future of myelofibrosis [will be] to utilize combinations. [However,] we must remember that there’s a difference between treating patients in clinical trials vs treating patients in real life.
At this year’s meeting, findings from the phase 1/2 SAVE study of revumenib (SNDX-5613) plus decitabine/cedazuridine, (ASTX727) and venetoclax (Venclexta) were also presented. How did the results live up to expectations surrounding the use of menin inhibitors, and what are the next steps for the regimen?
That was an exciting study [done in] a group of patients with heavily pretreated AML. Some of these patients had undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation and had received several lines of [prior] therapy. Patients who have refractory AML must go to clinic very frequently. Being able to offer them a regimen that’s all oral is very meaningful because [they do not] have to come to clinic as frequently to receive an IV hypomethylating agent. Most patients had at least some response [to the combination], and many had impressive responses. [Notably,] many patients had been previously treated with venetoclax. Menin inhibitors have been practice-changing in AML, and we’ve seen some responses [with this approach] in patients who have previously not responded to anything else. I look forward to seeing [more about] this combination, and hopefully [we can] bring it into earlier lines of therapy.
What were the biggest updates in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) according to data presented at the meeting?
CML is very interesting. We all think that CML is a disease that we’ve conquered. We [see] great outcomes and almost normal life expectancy in most patients who are responding to therapy. [However], there is still a lot of development in the field. Several studies are investigating asciminib [Scemblix] in several different ways. The first study that we see is the [phase 3] ASCEMBL study [NCT03106779] comparing asciminib with bosutinib [Bosulif]. Updated [data presented at this year’s meeting] showed that asciminib is still outperforming bosutinib in terms of molecular remissions. [Investigators are] also studying asciminib in different, more creative ways in CML. They’re combining asciminib with other TKIs either in the up-front setting or in a later-line setting because of its slightly different mechanism of action. We’re also seeing the development of other TKIs that are either similar to asciminib or similar to ponatinib [Iclusig] in their mechanisms of action. There is still a lot of drug development in a disease where we thankfully have [achieved] a lot of great outcomes.
[It will be interesting to see how this next generation of agents impact current practice,] especially if they improve tolerability. For a disease where [a patient has] to be on life-long therapy, it’s important to have agents that are well tolerated.
Editor’s note: This interview was conducted prior to the conclusion of the 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting.
References
- Pemmaraju N, Mead AJ, Somervaille T, et al. Transform-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international phase 3 study of navitoclax in combination with ruxolitinib versus ruxolitinib plus placebo in patients with untreated myelofibrosis. Blood. 2023;142(suppl 1):620. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-173509
- Rampal R, Grosicki S, Chraniuk D, et al. Pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib for Janus Kinase Inhibitor treatment-naïve patients with myelofibrosis: results of the MANIFEST-2 randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Blood. 2023;142(suppl 1):628. doi:10.1182/blood-2023-179141
Exploring the Molecular Aspects of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Associated with Unusual Site Vein Thrombosis: Review of the Literature and Latest Insights
Abstract
Red Blood Cell Contribution to Thrombosis in Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia
Julien Grenier, Wassim El Nemer, and Maria De Grandis
Prediction models for essential thrombocythemia from two longitudinal studies involving 2000 patients
January 23, 2024
Tiziano Barbui and Alessandra Carobbio
Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in several areas of Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (Ph-neg MPNs), namely polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). The driver mutations in the JAK2-V617, MPL, calreticulin opened new diagnostic and prognostic possibilities and provided new targets for therapy [1].
ET is currently diagnosed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [2] and International Consensus Criteria (ICC) [3] criteria, involving a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, laboratory and molecular features, and is defined by clonal thrombocytosis with characteristic bone marrow megakaryocyte morphology, which allows a differentiation from PV and prefibrotic myelofibrosis (pre-PMF); the latter is a distinct entity with a clinical picture often characterized by isolated thrombocytosis mimicking ET. In a multicenter series of 1104 patients previously classified as having ET, the diagnosis was re-evaluated following strict application of the 2008 WHO classification, which includes well-defined histopathological criteria. The diagnosis of ET was confirmed in 891 patients (81%) and revised to pre-PMF in 180 (16%) [4]. A subset of ET patients has a triple-negative (TN) genotype due to the absence of detectable mutations in driver genes and is observed in ~10% of ET cases [1].
Current information on risk factors of the major critical events (thrombosis, evolution to MF, blast phase (BP), and survival) derives from registry and multicenter observational studies while single-center reports conducted at tertiary referral institutions are very limited [5]. Each study design has its strengths and limitations. Observational multicenter studies and registries can capture a large number of cases but may face challenges related to data quality and consistency. Ensuring the accuracy and uniformity of data across multiple centers becomes a critical consideration.
Studies conducted in tertiary centers, exemplified by those presented in this Blood Cancer Journal issue from Florence [6] and Mayo Clinic [7] hospitals, are more robust in nature as they can provide a solid description of natural history of this myeloproliferative neoplasm. These are conducted by specialized teams comprising clinician hematologists, pathologists, geneticists, and other experts with proficiency in MPNs and are equipped with up-to-date technologies including molecular analyses, which are essential in the case of ET where genetic mutations play a significant role in diagnosis and prognosis. Nevertheless, despite providing comprehensive insights into a well-defined cohort of patients, these centers may have a patient referral bias and limited generalizability to the broader population. This may suggest that description of disease presentation and results on prognostic factors may not be universally reproducible, and caution should be exercised when extrapolating the results to consecutive patient groups.
The Mayo and Florence reports each included 1000 ET patients; all 2000 cases met ICC 2022 and WHO diagnostic criteria and were fully annotated for driver mutations; diagnosis required hematopathology review to minimize unintended inclusion of patients with masked PV or pre-PMF. This revision is critical for patients diagnosed with ET prior to the WHO recognition of masked PV and pre-PMF, as the incidence of complications such as thrombosis, myelofibrosis, blast phase, and overall survival differs between these entities compared to “true ET”. All patients in the two studies were annotated for driver mutations, which were found in approximately 90% of cases, with similar proportions in the two series for JAK2 V617F, CALR including CALR type 1/1-like and CALR type 2/2-like, MPL and TN. Interestingly, female sex clustered preferentially with TN and JAK2 vs. CALR/MPL mutations (p < 0.01), and extreme thrombocytosis clustered with CALR (type 2 more than type 1), TN, and MPL, whereas leukocytosis clustered with JAK2 mutation (p < 0.001). It is noteworthy that the two patients’ series from Mayo and Florence showed remarkably similar presentations over the extensive recruitment period of more than 40 years.
In these retrospective cohorts, 20% of patients had a history of vascular complications at diagnosis and a similar percentage of driver mutations clustered in a similar manner. Importantly, these findings are consistent with data observed in other real-world routine clinical practice of recent reviews on ET [8, 9]. This convergence of information on disease presentation between Mayo and Florence highlights that the characteristics of these two retrospective cohorts are unlikely to have been influenced by potential reference bias. Thus, the consistency of these patterns across different settings adds value to the findings of these two studies, reinforcing the reliability of the observed trends and minimizing the impact of referral bias.
Therefore, the Mayo and Florence longitudinal studies offer the unique advantage of capturing the dynamic evolution of ET disease in real-world clinical practice over an extended period of median 8.5 years (range, 0.01–52.7) and 8 years (range, 0.03–42.9), respectively, providing robust estimates of disease-specific outcomes, i.e., arterial and venous thrombosis, progression to overt MF, BP, and survival. This makes the results on risk factors for each of these critical events highly reliable and generalizable. In this context, the confirmation of the prognostic role of increased neutrophil granulocytes and decreased lymphocytes as independent risk factors for survival in 1164 ET patients should be highlighted. This new knowledge opens new avenues for future clinical trials on the role of inflammation in MPN and the associated new targets for therapy [10, 11]. In addition, the large number of cases annotated for driver mutations allowed the identification of risk scores for progression to myelofibrosis and blast phase and confirmed the predictive power of the International Prognostic Score of Thrombosis (IPSET-thrombosis) score. We agree with the authors that these results, obtained in a large series of patients with ET, mutually validated, can constitute a reference standard against which other series of cases fully annotated for driver mutations and followed up for a long time can be compared.
Inspired by the extensive ET series of these two Blood Cancer Journal papers, we reviewed our data on 891 WHO-diagnosed ET patients enrolled from multi-center institutions, in whom we investigated the effect of post-diagnosis intermediate events (thrombosis, MF, and BP) on mortality using multistate models [12]. Using these models, which increase the precision of estimation by correcting for competing risk factors, we found that patients with incident thrombosis had a progressively increased risk of death compared with patients without this event. As expected, the highest risk of death was associated with the occurrence of MF and BP (Fig. 1). Notably, in the time-dependent multivariate analysis, arterial but not venous thrombosis occurrence during follow-up was independently associated with death, together with evolution into MF and BP (Table 1). Therefore, in future analysis of longitudinal studies, we suggest that the conventional baseline prognostic evaluation in MPN should be revised by considering the intermediate events that might integrate the risk of the final outcome of interest in the single patient.
A Rare Coexistence of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma and JAK2-Positive Myeloproliferative Neoplasm: A Case of Dual Synchronous Hematological Malignancy
January 20, 2024
Abstract
This article explores the rare case of an 82-year-old man diagnosed concurrently with essential thrombocythemia and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). The limited existing literature on individuals harboring both myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) and monoclonal gammopathy (MG) is of significant interest due to the distinct origins of these malignancies. The etiology of MG in MPN patients remains elusive, leading to speculation about a potential relationship or interplay between the two conditions. This unique case prompts a deeper exploration of the mechanisms underlying the coexistence of JAK2-positive MPN and SMM. It underscores the importance of tailored therapeutic strategies that carefully consider the inherent risks and potential adverse outcomes associated with these specific malignancies, thereby warranting further clinical research.
Introduction
While existing literature acknowledges the coexistence of dual malignancies within the same patient [1], there is relatively limited documentation regarding the simultaneous occurrence of dual hematological malignancies (DHMs) [2,3], encompassing both myeloid and lymphoid hemopathies. A noteworthy aspect is the distinctive origin of these two malignancies from separate lineages within the hematopoietic ancestral tree [4]. DHMs can be classified as synchronous, manifesting within six months of the initial malignancy diagnosis, or asynchronous if they arise later [5].
Since its inclusion in the classification of monoclonal gammopathy (MG), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) has emerged as a significant aspect of MG [6], attracting attention in various clinical investigations.
Currently, no established strategies exist for treating or monitoring patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and concurrent SMM. Additionally, the precise source of SMM in patients with MPN is not well understood, and there is uncertainty regarding whether an aberrant plasma cell condition arises from the identical hematopoietic clone as the MPN.
Numerous case reports have highlighted the occurrence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) or multiple myeloma (MM) in patients with MPN, with details from only a limited number of patient cohorts published [7]. Remarkably, to date, there have been no reported instances of the concurrent diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and SMM. In this report, we present a case of synchronous concurrent SMM and ET and provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature.
Case Presentation
An 82-year-old man with a history of hypertension and diabetes was referred to our department for the management of thrombocytosis. Physical examination revealed no remarkable findings, and there was no evidence of lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly. Laboratory results indicated a platelet count of 946 g/L, hemoglobin of 12.5 g/dL, and a white blood cell count of 6.4 g/L. The patient had no systemic symptoms.
Thrombocytosis workup was initiated, initially excluding infections and iron deficiency. The platelet count was notably elevated, suggesting uncommonly high levels for secondary causes of thrombocytosis.
The patient’s chemistry panel results are shown in Table 1. Monoclonal protein was measured at 36.6 g/L. Serum immunofixation electrophoresis revealed IgG lambda gammopathy. Free light chain lambda was elevated, and kappa was normal.