Category Archives: Polycythemia Vera

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b shows anti-polycythaemia vera activity without causing clinically significant anaemia

Posted on by

Keita Kirito, Albert Qin, Shanshan Suo, Rongfeng Fu, Daoxiang Wu, Toshiaki Sato, Oleh Zagrijtschuk, Kazuya Shimoda, Norio Komatsu & Jie Jin

July 11, 2o24

Polycythaemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that, in most cases, harbour the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2) driver mutation JAK2V617F [1]. PV is characterised by an over-production of blood cells with increased haematocrit levels, which is a risk factor for thrombotic events (TEs) and cardiovascular mortality [1, 2]. Low-dose aspirin and phlebotomy are usually recommended for patients with low-risk PV (i.e., no history of thrombosis and age ≤60 years). The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends ropeginterferon alfa-2b (BESREMi®) as a preferred cytoreductive treatment for patients with low- or high-risk PV [3].

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated recombinant proline-interferon alpha (IFN-a) with a favourable in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) profile [4, 5]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b has demonstrated substantial anti-PV clinical activity, including complete haematologic response (CHR; defined as a haematocrit <45% without phlebotomy, a platelet count ≤ 400 × 109/L, and a white blood cell count ≤10 × 109/L) and a reduction in the JAK2V617F allele burden [6,7,8,9]. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b injection is approved for adult patients with PV at an initial dose of 100 µg (or 50 µg for patients already receiving cytoreductive therapy) with 50 µg incremental intrapatient increases in the dose up to a maximum recommended dose of 500 µg every two weeks. It can take several months to reach the plateau dose level [6]. An alternative dosing regimen with a higher starting dose of 250 µg and simpler intrapatient dose escalation to 500 µg every two weeks with flexible dose adjustment according to tolerability was explored as a treatment option. This regimen controlled PV effectively, as defined by the CHR, and was associated with a shorter time to achieve a CHR [8, 9]. In this report, we aimed to examine the data from the approved slow-dose titration and exploratory higher starting dose regimens focusing on the dynamics of haemoglobin (Hgb) and the occurrence of anaemia. Anaemia is important in the context of PV treatment for several reasons. First, patients who undergo frequent phlebotomy may suffer from symptomatic iron deficiency, leading to anaemia [10]. Anaemia and symptoms can negatively affect the patient well-being and should be avoided in patients with PV and MPNs. The symptoms include headache, insomnia, concentration difficulties, dizziness, restless legs and may coincide and potentiate the disease-related symptoms of the underlying MPN [11,12,13]. Commonly used agents in the PV treatment cause anaemia in substantial numbers of cases ranging from 18% with hydroxyurea (HU) [14] to 72% with ruxolitinib [11, 15]. Anaemia is symptomatic in many cases and may limit the treatment dose or lead to treatment interruption if uncontrolled or severe cases are present. Association between venous thromboembolism and iron-deficiency anaemia has also been shown [16]. Thus, having an agent that can effectively control the elevated haematocrit without excessively suppressing the normal erythropoiesis is a major therapeutic advantage.

An important question regarding ropeginterferon alfa-2b in this context is whether the control of haematocrit is commonly accompanied by clinically significant anaemia, i.e., at the ≥grade 3 level or at the moderate, grade 2 level, but the anaemia is persistent and unmanageable. We therefore performed a retrospective analysis of the effect of ropeginterferon alfa-2b on Hgb levels at various time points or on the occurrence of anaemia with the data available from our two prospective clinical studies in patients with PV.

Read more

 

Disease Duration, Elevated WBC Count, and VAF Predict Disease Progression in Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

June 14, 2024

Author(s): Megan Hollasch

Time from diagnosis to enrollment, elevated white blood cell (WBC) count, and variant allele frequency (VAF) were significantly associated with an increased risk of disease progression among patients with polycythemia vera (PV), according to data from the phase 4 prospective, observational REVEAL study (NCT02252159) presented at the 2024 EHA Congress by Michael R. Grunwald, MD.

“Five predictors of PV progression were identified: disease duration, thrombotic event [TE] history, WBC count of greater than 11 × 109/L, hematocrit [HCT] level of 0.45 L/L or lower, and VAF. However, HCT [level] of 0.45 L/L or lower may be confounded by disease duration and cytoreductive treatment covariates. These results provide additional support for the use of disease duration and elevated WBC and VAF as risk factors for disease progression, and identify history of TEs as a potential novel risk factor,” Grunwald and coauthors wrote in a poster presentation of the findings. Grunwald is chief of the Leukemia Division at Atrium Health’s Levine Cancer Institute and director of the Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program at Levine Cancer Institute in Charlotte, North Carolina.

At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, findings from REVEAL, the largest prospective, observational clinical study in patients with PV to date (n = 2023), showed that 6.7% of patients progressed to myelofibrosis (MF). Results from a univariate analysis of patients with vs without progression revealed that significant covariates consisted of time from PV diagnosis to enrollment (OR, 1.065; 95% CI, 1.040-1.090; P < .0001), history of TEs (yes vs no; OR, 1.722; 95% CI, 1.170-2.534; P = .0059), HCT levels of 0.45 L/L or lower (>0.45 vs ≤0.45 L/L; OR, 0.593; 95% CI, 0.410-0.858; P = .0056), and white blood cell (WBC) count of greater than 11 × 109/L at enrollment (>11 vs ≤11 × 109/L; OR, 2.053; 95% CI, 1.445-2.918; P < .0001).

Read more

Dr Raajit Rampal Discusses Disease Modification and Emerging Therapies in Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Laura Joszt, MA

Achieving a disease-modifying therapy for polycythemia vera might require adjusting the end points in a study needed for a drug to be approved, said Raajit Rampal, MD, PhD, hematologic oncologist, associate attending physician, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Transcript

Currently, there are no disease-modifying treatments in polycythemia vera, but it is being explored. What might such a therapy look like?

If we talk about disease modification, the first question is, what do you mean by disease modification? I think, what we would want is for our patients to live the longest and fullest life, free of the symptoms or burdens of their disease. To me, that is the sort of working definition of disease modification. From there, one can try to come up with biological definitions of things like depleting the stem cell, which are important things. But keeping this on a patient level, what we want for our patients [is a life free of disease burden]. How do we think about therapies that address those issues?

Part of it is a regulatory conundrum in the sense that studies have to meet certain end points for drugs to get approved, but the way we study the drugs is relative to the definitions of the end points that make the drugs successful. In many cases, [the end point is asking] are you controlling the hematocrit adequately? That’s one of the major things in polycythemia vera. But in order to really try to get at the question of disease modification, we’ve got to think about changing the end points of our studies to reflect that.

What are the things that are going to best correlate with the idea that you aren’t keeping patients free of the catastrophic consequences of their disease, like blood clots, like [disease] turning into leukemia or myelofibrosis? Are you controlling the patient’s symptoms to an adequate degree? Those are the things that I think are fundamental. But we’ve got to change the end points of our studies to really get at that.

Read more

Younger Patients With PV May Benefit From Earlier Treatment With Cytoreductive Therapies

Posted on by

Laura Joszt, MA

Although patients younger than age 60 with polycythemia vera (PV) are typically not treated with cytoreductive therapy due to treatment toxicity concerns, this may result in an undertreatment of patients as there is no clear evidence that the risk of toxicity exceeds the potential benefit of treatment, according to a study published in Blood Advances.1

PV causes an overproduction of blood cells in the bone marrow, which leads to high numbers of circulating red blood cells.2 This thickens the blood, which may not flow through smaller blood vessels properly. Although PV can be diagnosed at any age, it most often occurs in people over the age of 60 years.2

For most patients, phlebotomy is the standard treatment, and it may be the only treatment needed for years. However, additional treatment to suppress the formation of blood cells in the bone marrow may be needed. Cytoreductive therapies, such as interferons, hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib, and anagrelide, may be needed, particularly for high-risk patients.3

Currently, cytoreductive therapies are not routinely recommended by the European LeukemiaNet or National Comprehensive Cancer Network for patients with PV younger than 60 years who don’t have a history of thrombosis, a high symptom burden, or an intolerance to phlebotomy.

Read more

Rusfertide Treatment Strengthens Response and Decreases Erythrocytosis Among Patients With Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Jordan Kadish

03/22/2024

According to findings from the international phase 2 REVIVE trial published in The New England Journal of Medicine, treatment with rusfertide, a peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, strengthened responses and decreased erythrocytosis among patients with polycythemia vera (PV). Patients who received rusfertide demonstrated a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the dose-finding period.

Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, and coauthors stated, “Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis,” or a high concentration of red blood cells in the blood. “The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown,” they added.

To expand on the available research, the study authors aimed to assess the efficacy of rusfertide among patients with polycythemia vera. The primary end point was a response, which was characterized by the hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and finishing the trial regimen during part 2. The modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary was utilized to assess patient-reported outcomes of symptoms.

Read more

Rusfertide, a Hepcidin Mimetic, for Control of Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Marina Kremyanskaya, M.D., Ph.D., Andrew T. Kuykendall, M.D., Naveen Pemmaraju, M.D., Ellen K. Ritchie, M.D., Jason Gotlib, M.D., Aaron Gerds, M.D., Jeanne Palmer, M.D., Kristen Pettit, M.D., Uttam K. Nath, M.D., Abdulraheem Yacoub, M.D., Arturo Molina, M.D., Samuel R. Saks, M.D., et al., for the REVIVE Trial Investigators*

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Polycythemia vera is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis. Rusfertide, an injectable peptide mimetic of the master iron regulatory hormone hepcidin, restricts the availability of iron for erythropoiesis. The safety and efficacy of rusfertide in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera are unknown.

METHODS

 

In part 1 of the international, phase 2 REVIVE trial, we enrolled patients in a 28-week dose-finding assessment of rusfertide. Part 2 was a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period in which we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a response, defined by hematocrit control, absence of phlebotomy, and completion of the trial regimen during part 2. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed by means of the modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) patient diary (scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms).

RESULTS

Seventy patients were enrolled in part 1 of the trial, and 59 were assigned to receive rusfertide (30 patients) or placebo (29 patients) in part 2. The estimated mean (±SD) number of phlebotomies per year was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). The mean maximum hematocrit was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 as compared with 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. During part 2, a response was observed in 60% of the patients who received rusfertide as compared with 17% of those who received placebo (P=0.002). Between baseline and the end of part 1, rusfertide treatment was associated with a decrease in individual symptom scores on the MPN-SAF in patients with moderate or severe symptoms at baseline. During parts 1 and 2, grade 3 adverse events occurred in 13% of the patients, and none of the patients had a grade 4 or 5 event. Injection-site reactions of grade 1 or 2 in severity were common.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with polycythemia vera, rusfertide treatment was associated with a mean hematocrit of less than 45% during the 28-week dose-finding period, and the percentage of patients with a response during the 12-week randomized withdrawal period was greater with rusfertide than with placebo. (Funded by Protagonist Therapeutics; REVIVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057040. opens in new tab.)

Read more

Rusfertide Improves Responses in Phlebotomy-Dependent Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Caroline Seymour

Patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera, a type of myeloproliferative neoplasm, treated with rusfertide experienced a response rate of 60% (n = 18/30) compared with 17% (n = 5/29) in those who received placebo (P = .002), according to updated findings from part 2 of the phase 2 REVIVE trial (NCT04057040) published in the New England Journal of Medicine.1

The international trial was designed with 3 parts: a 28-week, open-label, dose-finding portion in which rusfertide was added to a patient’s ongoing therapy of phlebotomy alone or cytoreductive therapy with optional phlebotomy; a double-blind, randomized withdrawal portion wherein patients were randomly assigned to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks (weeks 29 to 41); and an open-label extension period following patients on rusfertide therapy for up to 3 years.

Findings from part 1 showed that the estimated mean number of annual phlebotomies was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). Moreover, the mean maximum hematocrit level was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 vs 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. Patient quality of life was also improved on rusfertide, with a lower severity of disease-related symptoms.

“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating [patients with] polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, an associate professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology) at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York, and lead author of the study, stated in a news release.2 “Pending further clinical studies, this injectable agent could become a valuable therapeutic tool for a disease which many patients and their physicians struggle to bring under control.”

Read more

Rusfertide More Than Triples Responses Vs Placebo in Phlebotomy-Dependent Polycythemia Vera

Posted on by

Caroline Seymour

Treatment with rusfertide led to a 60% response rate (n = 18/30) vs 17% (n = 5/29) with placebo in patients with phlebotomy-dependent polycythemia vera (P = .002), according to updated findings from part 2 of the phase 2 REVIVE trial (NCT04057040) which were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.1

The international trial was designed with 3 parts: a 28-week, open-label, dose-finding portion in which rusfertide was added to a patient’s ongoing therapy of phlebotomy alone or cytoreductive therapy with optional phlebotomy; a double-blind, randomized withdrawal portion wherein patients were randomly assigned to receive rusfertide or placebo for 12 weeks (weeks 29 to 41); and an open-label extension period following patients on rusfertide therapy for up to 3 years.

Findings from part 1 showed that the estimated mean number of annual phlebotomies was 8.7±2.9 during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide and 0.6±1.0 during part 1 (estimated difference, 8.1 phlebotomies per year). Moreover, the mean maximum hematocrit level was 44.5±2.2% during part 1 vs 50.0±5.8% during the 28 weeks before the first dose of rusfertide. Patient quality of life was also improved on rusfertide, with a lower severity of disease-related symptoms.

“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating [patients with] polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, PhD, an associate professor of medicine (hematology and medical oncology) at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York, and lead author of the study, stated in a news release.2 “Pending further clinical studies, this injectable agent could become a valuable therapeutic tool for a disease which many patients and their physicians struggle to bring under control.”

Read more

PharmaEssentia’s BESREMi (ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft) Now Recommended as a Preferred First-line Cytoreductive Therapy for Polycythemia Vera in Updated NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines)

Posted on by

Update based on NCCN’s determination of superior efficacy, safety and evidence for BESREMi in high and low-risk patients, reflecting an ongoing shift in PV care toward earlier intervention

BURLINGTON, Mass.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–PharmaEssentia USA Corporation, a subsidiary of PharmaEssentia Corporation (TWSE: 6446), a global biopharmaceutical innovator based in Taiwan leveraging deep expertise and proven scientific principles to deliver new biologics in hematology and oncology, today announced that the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) have recently been updated to include ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, marketed as BESREMi®, as a preferred first-line cytoreductive therapy option for the treatment of adults with symptomatic, low-risk polycythemia vera (PV). Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft is the only preferred therapeutic option for both high-risk and low-risk (symptomatic) PV regardless of treatment history.1

“The recent update to the NCCN Guidelines® reflects the ongoing shift in PV care towards earlier intervention, focusing on long-term patient health,” said Rami Komrokji, M.D., Vice Chair of the Malignant Hematology Department and Head of the Leukemia and MDS Section at Moffitt Cancer Center.

Read more

Study shows early success of a novel drug in treating a rare and chronic blood cancer

Posted on by

February 21, 2024

by The Mount Sinai Hospital

A novel treatment for polycythemia vera, a potentially fatal blood cancer, demonstrated the ability to control overproduction of red blood cells, the hallmark of this malignancy and many of its debilitating symptoms in a multi-center clinical trial led by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

In the phase 2 study, the drug rusfertide limited excess production of red blood cells, the main manifestation of polycythemia vera, over the 28-week course of treatment. The results suggest it could replace therapeutic phlebotomy, a common form of treatment which has proven to be a burden for many patients. The results of the study were published today (Feb. 21) in The New England Journal of Medicine.

“Rusfertide appears to represent a significant step forward in treating polycythemia vera through its unique approach of limiting the amount of iron available for blood cell production,” says Marina Kremyanskaya, MD, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Medicine (Hematology and Medical Oncology) at Icahn Mount Sinai and lead author of the study.

Read more