Clinical Trial Aims to Test Tagraxofusp and Pacritinib Combination Therapy in Patients With MF

A new study testing the combination of tagraxofusp and pacritinib in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is now open.

The single-center, open-label, early phase 1, pilot trial aims to recruit 20 patients with MF who are at least 18 years of age and who have previously been treated with a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor or in whom JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy is not appropriate, is contraindicated, or was declined.

Participants will be given 12 µg/kg of intravenous tagraxofusp once a day for 3 consecutive days and 200 mg of oral pacritinib twice a day starting at the 4th day of the second cycle and administered continuously with subsequent cycles starting on day 1 of each cycle.

The primary outcome measures will be a spleen volume reduction of 35% of more and the change in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score Version 2.0 (MPN-SAF TSS 2.0) from baseline to week 24.

Secondary outcome measures will include the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, the change from baseline in anemia and platelet count, and any improvement in patients’ quality of life based on the global impression of change.

Tagraxofusp is a cytotoxin directed at CD123, and pacritinib is a small-molecule kinase inhibitor. The rationale of using these 2 drugs in combination is their compatible mechanisms of action targeting MF stem cells and the bone marrow. It is thought that the combination may lead to improvements in symptoms associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms and reduce splenomegaly.

Both agents have previously been studied in cases of mildly depleted bone marrow and were shown to be safe and led to hematological improvements.

The trial is not yet recruiting participants but aims to recruit 20 participants. It is estimated to be completed in December 2026.

Read more

Biomed Valley Discoveries Announces First Patient Dosed in Phase 1/2 Combination Study of Ulixertinib with Ruxolitinib (Jakafi®) in Patients with Myelofibrosis

Provided by GlobeNewswire  

— Dual targeting of JAK 1/2 (ruxolitinib) and ERK 1/2 (ulixertinib) may represent a novel treatment approach for myelofibrosis and possibly other myeloproliferative neoplasms

KANSAS CITY, Mo., April 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Biomed Valley Discoveries (BVD), a clinical-stage biotechnology company guided by its founders’ intent of bringing hope for life to patients, today announced that the first patient has been dosed in a Phase 1/2 combination study of ulixertinib, BVD’s highly selective, first-in-class ERK 1/2 inhibitor with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor for the treatment of myelofibrosis, a rare type of bone marrow cancer that disrupts the body’s normal production of blood cells.

Raajit Rampal, M.D., Ph.D., a hematologist-oncologist with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center who specializes in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms and leukemia, is the lead principal investigator for this investigator-initiated trial.

“We’re thrilled to announce the milestone of first patient dosed in this trial, and grateful for the opportunity to collaborate with Dr. Rampal and Incyte to explore the potential of ERK inhibition as a complement to JAK inhibition for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis,” said Brent Kreider, Ph.D., President of BVD. “This trial helps further our commitment to fully interrogate the potential of direct ERK inhibition to address unmet patient needs in various cancer settings where MAPK signaling is implicated.”

Read more

Fatigue, Quality of Life Improve With Rusfertide: Andrew Kuykendall, MD

April 27, 2025

Author(s): Maggie L. Shaw, Andrew Kuykendall, MD

Bringing this interview with Andrew Kuykendall, MD, clinical researcher at Moffitt Cancer Center, to a close, he addresses safety concerns that have been linked to the injectable hepcidin mimetic rusfertide (Takeda) and its overall impact on patient quality of life. Rusfertide is under investigation for treatment of polycythemia vera, a myeloproliferative neoplasm, in the ongoing phase 3 VERIFY trial (NCT05210790), on which Kuykendall is an investigator.

Previous segments of this interview focused on managing polycythemia vera, understanding hematocrit thresholds, reducing thrombotic risk, and reducing patient dependence on phlebotomy.

Read more

Clinical Trials Can Open Doors for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

By Kathryn Johnson, DNP, MSc, FNP-BC
Fact checked by Bridget Hoyt

Educating patients on the “risks and benefits” of clinical trials is a part of the pipeline for better treatment options in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in which nurses can engage, said a nurse practitioner.

For patients with MPNs, clinical trials have paved the way for better treatment outcomes, increasing options vastly within a short amount of time. In an interview with Oncology Nursing News, Kathryn Johnson, DNP, MSc, FNP-BC, spoke to the importance of the development of these options and nurses’ role in making those possible.

As Johnson, a clinical program manager at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, outlined, nurses can play a key part in informing patients on what to expect on clinical trials. She advised not only being prepared with information patients should know, but making time for patients to air their concerns and ask questions as well.

Johnson added that in the time that she has been working in oncology, multiple advancements have been made in the treatment of MPNs. She expects this trend to continue in the coming years.

Read more

Fedratinib Shows Promise in Long-Term MPN Success With Tolerable Toxicity

By Hany Elmariah, MD

A phase 1 trial investigated the safety and tolerability of maintenance therapy with the JAK2 inhibitor fedratinib (Inrebic) following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and myelodysplastic syndrome/MPN overlap syndromes.

While HCT offers potential cure for MPNs, posttransplant relapse remains a significant challenge. Fedratinib, effective in myelofibrosis, with a favorable safety profile and oral administration, presents a rational strategy to reduce relapse and potentially prevent graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) while preserving the graft-vs-tumor (GVT) effect.

“Usually with fedratinib, the main toxicities are cytopenia, so low blood counts. We also see a fair amount of [gastrointestinal (GI)] toxicity, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea,” said Hany Elmariah, MD, associate member at the Moffitt Cancer Center in the Department of Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, in an interview with Targeted OncologyTM.

The study enrolled patients post-HCT who received fedratinib between days +60 and +100 for up to 1 year. The trial utilized a 3+3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Eleven patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The MTD was identified as 400 mg daily. While no DLTs occurred within the 30-day window, 4 patients withdrew due to non-DLT adverse events. Notably, only 1 patient developed severe chronic GVHD. The median progression-free survival was 12.4 months, and the 1-year overall survival was 100%.

Read more

New Trial Will Assess Safety and Efficacy of MF Drug

Publish Date

A clinical trial aiming to determine the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the experimental drug WJ01024 combined with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is set to begin soon.

“Although the clinical efficacy of ruxolitinib tablets has been confirmed, only about half of MF patients can achieve the ideal therapeutic effect (≥35% reduction in spleen volume and ≥50% improvement in disease symptoms at 24 weeks),” the authors wrote. “Therefore, there is an urgent need for innovative drugs that can be combined with ruxolitinib tablets to enhance therapeutic efficacy and meet clinical needs,” they added.

WJ01024 aims to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of ruxolitinib through  XPO-1 inhibition. Previous in vitro studies have confirmed that the drug enhances ruxolitinib anti-cell proliferation activity, the researchers noted. Furthermore, preliminary studies on humans suggest that WJ01024 is effective as monotherapy for relapsing patients and those intolerant to JAK inhibitors, they added.

The trial will consist of a dose escalation and a dose extension phase (phase 1a and phase 2). Phase 1b will divide patients into three groups receiving 40 mg, 60 mg, and 80 mg of WJ01024, respectively. Phase 2 will be an open-label evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the recommended dose in combination with ruxolitinib.

The study will only include patients diagnosed with MF and with the international prognostic scoring system risk category of intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high-risk. Patients in the accelerated blast phase or previous treatment with either JAK or XPO-1 inhibitors are not eligible for participation.

Read more

Safety and Efficacy of Busulphan Based on Dosing Patterns in the Real‐World Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

March 2025

Ali Mahdi, Alexandros Rampotas, Patrick Roberts, Joanna Stokes

Abstract

Introduction
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), such as polycythaemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis (MF), are primarily treated by managing blood counts to reduce the thrombotic risk using cytoreductive agents. Busulphan, an oral alkylating agent, has been historically used for MPN management due to its myelosuppressive effects, but concerns about its risk of leukaemic transformation have limited its use.
Methods
This real‐world retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of busulphan in 115 MPN patients across 13 UK hospitals. Responses in patients with ET and PV only were assessed using European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria.
Results
With a median age of 78 years, the overall response rate was 78.1%, with 29% of PV and 18% of ET patients achieving complete responses. Dosing regimens were similarly distributed between repeated single doses of busulphan (31%), courses of treatment lasting 1–4 weeks (30%) and continuous therapy for more than 4 weeks (35%). No cases of disease progression to acute leukaemia or myelofibrosis were recorded during the median follow‐up of 23 months. Adverse events were infrequent, with fatigue and cytopaenia being the most common (4% each).
Conclusion
Busulphan demonstrated a favourable safety profile and is a viable cytoreductive option, particularly for elderly patients who are intolerant to hydroxycarbamide.

Pelabresib Plus Ruxolitinib Improves Spleen Responses in Myelofibrosis

By Roman Fabbricatore
Fact checked by Russ Conroy

Pelabresib (CPI 0610) in combination with ruxolitinib (Jakafi) significantly improved spleen responses and elicited robust clinical activity compared with placebo/ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis, according to results from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495) published in Nature Medicine.1

Efficacy data from the trial revealed that the primary end point of spleen volume reduction of at least 35% at week 24 favored the investigational combination vs the placebo arm: 65.9% vs 35.2%, respectively (difference, 30.4%; 95% CI, 21.6%-39.3%; P <.001). Additionally, the mean percent change at week 24 in the respective arms was –50.6% (95% CI, –53.2% to –48.0%) vs –30.6% (95% CI, –33.7% to –27.5%). Spleen volume response was consistently higher with pelabresib vs placebo across predefined subgroups.

Furthermore, the hemoglobin response rate, defined as a 1.5 g/dl or greater mean increase, occurred in in 10.7% of the pelabresib arm (95% CI, 6.60%-14.90%) vs 6.0% of the placebo arm (95% CI, 2.85%-9.19%). Transfusions were received in the first 24 weeks of treatment in 27.6% and 37.5% of respective arms.

Greater reductions in NF-κB-regulated cytokines (–32.1% [95% CI, –34.9% to –29.2%] vs –19.4% [95% CI, –22.5% to –16.2%]), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; –43.5% [95% CI, –47.0% to –39.8%] vs –26.4% [95% CI, –30.5% to –22.1%]), and interleukin-6 (IL-6; –35.4% [95% CI, –44.2% to –25.2%] vs –14.5% [95% CI, –25.2% to –2.3%]) were seen in the investigational arm vs the placebo arm. Of note, a reduction in IL-8 levels was observed with pelabresib (–14.3% [95% CI, –22.3% to –5.5%]), but an increase was observed in the placebo arm (31.2% [95% CI, 17.5%-46.5%).

Read more

Dr Rampal on ​Emerging Therapies Under Investigation in Myelofibrosis

March 17, 2025

Author(s): Raajit K. Rampal, MD, PhD

Fact checked by: Ashling Wahner ,Chris Ryan

Raajit Rampal, MD, director of the Center for Hematologic Malignancies and director of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Program at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses emerging treatments for patients with myelofibrosis.

The therapeutic paradigm for myelofibrosis continues to expand with emerging treatment options, particularly with combination therapies, novel JAK inhibitors, and immunotherapeutic agents, Rampal begins. Among these, pelabresib (CPI-0610), a BET inhibitor, has completed phase 3 trials. Preliminary data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 trial (NCT04603495), which were presented in December 2023, demonstrated improved spleen responses and a trend toward better symptom management with the combination of pelabresib and ruxolitinib (Jakafi) vs placebo plus ruxolitinib in patients with JAK inhibitor–naive myelofibrosis. Updated findings from MANIFEST-2 were published in Nature Medicine in March 2025.

Beyond pelabresib, several other agents are currently in phase 3 trials for patients with myelofibrosis, Rampal says. Selinexor (Xpovio), which is currently FDA approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, is being studied in combination with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in the phase 3 XPORT-MF-034 trial (NCT04562389). Additionally, navtemadlin (KRT-232), an MDM2 inhibitor, is undergoing clinical evaluation in patients with myelofibrosis. Notably, these trials are ongoing, and no conclusive data are available at this time, Rampal emphasizes.

The development of next-generation JAK inhibitors also represents a promising area of investigation, according to Rampal. These newer inhibitors are anticipated to demonstrate greater potency and selectivity compared with existing agents, though they remain in early-phase clinical trials, he notes.

Rampal states that one of the most exciting advancements in this setting is the emergence of immunotherapies. Calreticulin-targeted antibodies are currently being evaluated in clinical trials, and 2 candidates are in development, he reports. If these agents prove effective, they could significantly alter the treatment paradigm, he concludes.

Read more

Promising New Treatment for Myelofibrosis Blood Cancer Using a Combination Targeted Therapy 

By 

An international phase 3 clinical trial of a new drug combination for treating the blood cancer myelofibrosis found that adding a second, experimental drug to standard treatment was more effective than the standard treatment alone. Further, adding the second drug did not significantly increase side effects. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) enrolled the most patients in the trial.

“This is one of the largest myelofibrosis clinical trials to date,” says MSK leukemia specialist Raajit Rampal, MD, PhD, lead author of the study, published March 10 in Nature Medicine. “There is a real unmet need for patients with this disease, and the findings from this trial represent an exciting advance.”

This study looked at adding an experimental drug called pelebresib to the drug ruxolitinib (Jakafi®), which is the current treatment for myelofibrosis. Both drugs are targeted therapies. Pelebrisib blocks the action of proteins involved in inflammation and cancer; ruxolitinib blocks a protein called JAK. This combination approach was based on ongoing research from the lab of MSK leukemia specialist and physician-scientist Ross Levine, MD.

Read more