Category Archives: Blood Cancer

Education on MPN Symptoms, Treatments Leads to Greater Involvement in Care

Posted on by

October 3, 2024

Author(s): Darlene Dobkowski, MA

Fact checked by: Alex Biese

Learning more about the different symptoms and treatment goals of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) can help patients be more involved in management decisions throughout the disease trajectory, an expert said.

“It’s not just the doctor and the nurses; it’s the person who has the disease [that] is the main person, so their involvement is very important,” said Dr. Swati Goel at the recent CURE® Educated Patient® Updates in MPNs at Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, New York.

Goel is the Leader of the Myeloproliferative Disorder Clinic, assistant director of the hematology-oncology fellowship program and associate professor in the department of oncology and medicine at Montefiore Einstein in New York, New York.

Throughout the event, Goel discussed that there are three types of MPNs: polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and myelofibrosis.

Read more

MPN Word of the Month: Platelets

Posted on by

As we know, myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of blood cancers that involve the overproduction of blood cells in the bone marrow. These conditions primarily include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). One of the primary features of certain MPNs, particularly essential thrombocythemia, is the abnormal production and function of platelets, that help with blood clotting and maintaining vascular integrity. Understanding the relationship between platelets and MPNs is crucial for diagnosing,
monitoring, and managing these disorders.

What Are Platelets?

Platelets, also known as thrombocytes, are small, disc-shaped cell fragments in the blood. Produced in the bone marrow by megakaryocytes, platelets are essential for hemostasis—the process that prevents excessive bleeding when blood vessels are injured. When a blood vessel is
damaged, platelets adhere to the site of injury, coagulate to form a plug, and interact with clotting factors to stabilize the clot, preventing further blood loss.

How Do Platelets Work In MPNs?

In MPNs, the bone marrow exhibits uncontrolled proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells, leading to the overproduction of various blood cells, including platelets. This dysregulation can significantly impact platelet function and count, resulting in both hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications.

Platelets in Essential Thrombocythemia (ET)
Essential thrombocythemia is characterized by an excessive production of platelets due to  mutations in genes such as JAK2, CALR, or MPL. In ET:

● High Platelet Counts: Patients often present with elevated platelet counts, sometimes exceeding one million platelets per microliter of blood. Despite the abundance of platelets, they may not function normally, leading to an increased risk of clotting (thrombosis) and bleeding (hemorrhage).
● Thrombotic Risk: Abnormally high platelet counts increase the likelihood of clot formation within blood vessels, potentially leading to complications such as stroke, heart attack, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism.
● Bleeding Risk: Interestingly, patients with extremely high platelet counts can also experience bleeding issues. This is because the overproduction of platelets can lead to a depletion of von Willebrand factor (vWF), which is necessary for platelet adhesion,

Platelets in Polycythemia Vera (PV)
In PV, there is an overproduction of red blood cells, often accompanied by increased platelets and white blood cells:

● Platelet Dysfunction: Although the platelet count in PV is usually elevated, platelet function can be abnormal. This dysfunction can result in an increased risk of thrombosis even though there is a high platelet count.
● Thrombotic Events: Similar to ET, patients with PV have a higher risk of blood clots because the not only is there an increase in blood viscosity (from elevated red blood cell mass) there is also altered platelet function.

Platelets in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Myelofibrosis is marked by the replacement of bone marrow with fibrous tissue, impairing normal blood cell production:

● Variable Platelet Counts: Patients with MF may have either low (thrombocytopenia) or high (thrombocytosis) platelet counts, depending on disease progression and bone marrow function.
● Abnormal Platelet Function: Regardless of the platelet count, platelet function is often compromised, which leads to a higher risk of both bleeding and clotting events.

Platelets in Diagnosis and Management
The evaluation of platelet count and function is an important part of diagnosing and managing MPNs. Laboratory tests commonly used include:

● Complete Blood Count (CBC): To assess platelet count, red blood cell mass, and white blood cell count.
● Bone Marrow Biopsy: To examine marrow architecture and megakaryocyte proliferation, providing insight into the degree of myeloproliferation.
● Genetic Testing: To identify mutations in JAK2, CALR, and MPL genes, which are associated with different MPNs.
● Platelet Function Tests: In some cases, platelet aggregation studies may be used to evaluate platelet function, especially if bleeding complications are present.

The primary goal in managing MPNs is to minimize the risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. Several treatment strategies are used to address abnormal platelets such as cytoreductive therapies, antiplatelet agents, JAK2 inhibitors, and close monitoring of blood counts.

Platelets play a central role in the diagnosis, progression, and care of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Understanding the complex interactions between platelets and MPNs is crucial for effective diagnosis, risk assessment, and management of these disorders. With appropriate
monitoring and individualized treatment strategies, the risks associated with abnormal platelet activity in MPNs can be managed, improving patient outcomes. For more information about MPNs visit our website at www.mpnadvocacy.com.

Assessing and Managing Bleeding Risk Pre-Surgery in Patients With MPNs

Posted on by

August 20 , 2024

Risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) who are scheduled for surgery are multifaceted and require consideration of individual patient characteristics, risk assessment, and perioperative management, according to results published in Cureus.

“Thrombosis, venous or arterial, is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in [essential thrombocythemia (ET)] and [polycythemia vera], while bleeding is more concerning in [myelofibrosis] and ET,” Mihaela Andreescu, MD, PhD, and colleagues wrote. “Surgical procedures also pose a significant risk for bleeding in MPNs, with a probability of 7.2% during surgery. Assessing bleeding and thrombosis risk in patients scheduled for surgery is crucial to optimize patient outcomes.”

Specific Risks for Bleeding and Thrombosis

Risk assessment tools included rational elastrometry (ROTEM), International Predictive Score for Thrombosis in ET (IPSET), and the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS).

The researchers identified age (>60), history of thrombosis, and genetic mutations, particularly variants of JAK2V617F, as risk factors for thrombosis in patients with MPN. Risk factors for bleeding included leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand syndrome, and history of bleeding.

“Individual patient factors must be considered to minimize severe bleeding and thrombotic complications in surgeries,” Dr. Andreescu and colleagues wrote. “Risk assessment and perioperative management are important aspects of improving the QOL and preventing complications in surgeries.”

Read more

Platelet proteomic profiling reveals potential mediators of immunothrombosis and proteostasis in myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

August 14, 2024

Sarah Kelliher, Sara Gamba, Luisa Weiss, Zhu Shen, Marina Marchetti, Francesca Schieppati, Caitriona Scaife, Stephen Madden, Kathleen Bennett, Anne Fortune, Su Maung, Michael Fay, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, 
Patricia Maguire, Anna Falanga, Barry Kevane, Anandi Krishnan

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are chronic bone marrow malignancies characterized by clonal proliferation of hematopoietic precursors and elevated cell counts in peripheral blood.1 Patients with MPN are at risk of progression to myelofibrosis or acute leukemia and experience a substantial burden of microvascular symptoms.2,3 However, thrombosis (both arterial and venous) represents the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET).4-6

Translational studies have indicated that the platelet proteome influences pathways relating to immune response, inflammation, and malignancy.7,8 Thrombocytosis and platelet hyperactivity are hallmarks of MPN;9 however, platelet count in isolation is not predictive of clinical outcome, and conventional antiplatelet therapy does not fully mitigate thrombotic risk.10 A comprehensive picture of the MPN platelet molecular profile is lacking, and to date, no studies have evaluated the unbiased platelet proteome in a sizable clinical cohort of affected patients. Here, we performed untargeted quantitative profiling of the platelet proteome in a large (n = 140) cohort of patients with PV and ET.

Using standardized platelet isolation protocols (supplemental Methods), we prepared purified platelets from peripheral blood samples of patients with an established diagnosis of MPN (World Health Organization defined, n = 59 ET, n = 41 PV) and a cohort of healthy controls (n = 40) recruited across 2 sites: Hospital Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy and Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Pertinent clinical features are shown in Figure 1 (and listed in supplemental Table 1). Interpatient variability, including age, sex, and treatment, as well as experimental batch effects, were adjusted as confounding factors in downstream expression analyses (supplemental Methods). Focusing on the most prothrombotic subtypes of MPNs, we hypothesized that the platelet proteome differs in MPN, and its characterization would offer insights into the underlying pathobiology and possible mechanisms underlying the associated clinical complications.

Read more

MPN Word of the Month: Hematocrit

Posted on by

Hematocrit is a key measurement in hematology that represents the proportion of blood volume occupied by red blood cells (RBCs). Expressed as a percentage, it provides crucial insights into an individual’s red blood cell mass and overall blood health. Typically, hematocrit levels are assessed through a routine blood test, often as part of a complete blood count (CBC).

In the context of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs)—hematocrit plays a significant role in diagnosis and management. Polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myelofibrosis each affect blood cell production but in different ways.

  1. Polycythemia Vera (PV): One of the indicators of PV is an elevated hematocrit level. In PV, the bone marrow produces an excess of red blood cells, leading to a high hematocrit. This can increase how thick the blood is (viscosity), potentially causing complications such as blood clots, strokes, or heart attacks. Regular monitoring of one’s hematocrit is essential for managing PV and assessing the effectiveness of treatments aimed at reducing the risk of these complications.
  2. Essential Thrombocythemia (ET): While ET primarily involves elevated platelet counts, a high hematocrit may also be observed due to secondary effects or overlapping features with other MPNs. Management focuses on controlling platelet levels to prevent thrombotic events, but monitoring hematocrit remains important for comprehensive disease management.
  3. Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF): In PMF, hematocrit levels may be low due to the replacement of bone marrow with fibrous tissue, leading to anemia. The disease’s progression can cause varying hematocrit levels, which are crucial for tracking disease progression and response to treatment.

In summary, hematocrit is more than just a routine blood test value; it is a vital indicator in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Immunofluorescence microscopy on the blood smear identifies patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Posted on by

July 17, 2024

Carlo Zaninetti, Leonard Vater, Lars Kaderali, Carl C. Crodel, Tina M. Schnöder, Jessica Fuhrmann, Leonard Swensson, Jan Wesche, Carmen Freyer, Andreas Greinacher & Florian H. Heidel

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a group of clonal stem cell disorders with heterogeneous clinical presentation [1]. Due to the risk of severe thromboembolic complications and disease progression, the early recognition of an MPN prior to the appearance of clinical complications is clearly warranted to facilitate early pharmacologic intervention [2,3,4]. Detection of the somatic mutations by genotyping has become an essential part of the diagnostic work-up of suspected subjects, as well as of the risk stratification after the diagnosis of MPN has been confirmed [5]. However, in many parts of the world molecular testing is barely affordable.

We have established an immunofluorescence microscopy (IF)-based method for platelet phenotyping on the peripheral blood smear [6]. This method has been proven to be highly efficient in the diagnosis of diverse hereditary platelet disorders by recognizing disease-specific changes of cell structures, including alterations of leukocytes and red blood cells (RBC) [7, 8]. Major advantages of this approach are the need of small amounts of blood (<100 μL) and the possibility to send the blood films by regular mail even long distances.

It is well-known that morphology of peripheral blood cells is also often altered in MPN [9, 10]. However, due to different methods and the heterogeneity of the patients’ populations, results are difficult to compare.

In the present study, we aimed at assessing platelet phenotype using our IF method in a cohort of patients diagnosed with MPN. The study has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00032588). Three German reference centers for diagnosis and treatment of MPN took part in the study: Internal Medicine C, University Medicine Greifswald; Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital Jena; and Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Germany. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of all centers. Patients or their legal guardians signed written informed consent to the investigation, which was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Healthy controls were enrolled among blood donors at the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.

Read more

Predictors of symptom scores in myeloproliferative neoplasms: A real-world retrospective cohort study

Posted on by

Muhammad Ali Khan, Syed Arsalan Ahmed Naqvi, Irbaz Bin Riaz, and Jeanne M. Palmer

Abstract

Background: Although high symptom burden indicates poor survival and informs treatment decisions, little is known about the impact of demographic, clinical, and laboratory features on total symptom score (TSS) in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN).
Methods: Patients with MPN (polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF)) were identified from the retrospective chart review. TSS, individual symptom scores (fatigue, early satiety, abdominal discomfort, inactivity, concentration problems, fever, night sweats, itching, bone pain, weight loss), demographic characteristics (race, ethnicity, age, gender), clinical features (time since diagnosis, depression status, obesity status, spleen size), laboratory results and season at the time of visit were recorded from the clinical encounter when index assessment of TSS was performed for each patient. Normality was assessed using visual inspection of data distribution, whereas multicollinearity was assessed using various inflation factors. A univariable regression followed by a multivariable regression analysis was conducted using a backward selection approach. A p-value <0.05 indicated a statistically significant association of a given feature with TSS.
Results: The chart review identified 252 patients (PV: 78; ET: 81; MF: 93). Mean age was 59 (SD: 17.7), 67 (SD: 13.0), and 68 (SD: 10.9) years for ET, PV, and MF respectively. Most patients were white (PV, MF: 92%; ET: 83%) and females (ET: 75%; PV: 60%; MF: 53%). The TSS of patients was highest with PV (mean: 18.5; SD: 16.9) followed by MF (mean: 18.1; SD: 15.4) and ET (mean: 14.3; SD: 15.9). Fatigue was the most reported symptom whereas the least reported symptoms were fever and weight loss. Univariable regression analyses showed depression (B: 17.7; p=0.02), female gender (B: 10.6; p=0.01), platelet count (B: 0.03; p=0.03), and hemoglobin (Hb) (B: -2.6; p=0.01) in PV patients, depression (B: 19.8, p=2×10-5) in ET patients and depression (B: 11.0, p=0.03), white blood cell (WBC) count (B: 0.2; p=0.01), neutrophil count (B: 0.3, p=0.01), and non-neutrophil WBC count (B: 0.6; p=0.02) in MF patients to have significant association with TSS. Multivariable regression analyses (Table) showed Hb (B: -2.5; p=0.01) and platelet count (B: 0.02; p=0.03) in PV patients, depression (B: 19.7; p=2×10-5) in ET patients and depression (B: 12.3, p=0.01) and WBC count (B: 0.3; p=0.002) in MF patients to have a significant association with TSS.
Conclusions: Depression in ET and MF and low Hb in PV were identified as significant drivers of symptom burden. Identifying and managing patients with these comorbidities could improve their quality of life with a potential survival benefit.

Masarova on the Latest Updates Across Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Posted on by

Lucia Masarova, MD

Lucia Masarova, MD, PhD, assistant professor, Department of Leukemia, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses some of the latest updates across myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

She discusses some significant studies, including the TRANSFORM-1 and MANIFEST-2 studies (NCT04472598; NCT04603495), and emerging therapeutic approaches, like combining ruxolitinib (Jakafi) with other agents, such as pelabresib (CPI-0610) and navitoclax.

Transcription:

0:09 | We are waiting for the top-line results of the phase 3 studies of the frontline ruxolitinib and the navitoclax vs ruxolitinib and placebo, as well as the top-line results of the other combo of ruxolitinib and pelabresib vs ruxolitinib and placebo. Both of those, the TRANSFORM-1 and MANIFEST-2 study studies, are highly expected results. They are coming to see whether we can move from the monotherapy of a JAK inhibitor to the combination of arms of both of the agents. That will expand the field, hopefully, and we will see where it is going to go. [There are] excellent results for spleen control that are exciting, the symptoms will need to be worked out, so we will see where it goes.

Read more

Dr. Guo Develops Test Promising Answers for Cancer Patients

Posted on by

Cancer researcher, Belinda Guo, knows that one of the biggest issues for people with myeloproliferative neoplasms (a group of rare blood cancers), is not knowing if the cancer will progress.

Dr Belinda Guo and her team at the University of Western Australia’s Translational Cancer Pathology Laboratory have invented a new blood-based test that detects specific changes in the blood of patients diagnosed with myelofibrosis.

With funding from Cancer Council WA, they are now working with clinicians to assess the blood of individuals who have undergone a bone marrow transplant to see if the transplant has worked.

We sat down with Belinda to hear more about her research project. Read the full interview below.

Read more

Follow-Up Needs for Blood Cancer Survivors May Determine Best Type of Provider

Posted on by

Laura Joszt, MA

For patients with blood cancers, follow-up care consisting of management of psychosocial consequences, promotion of a healthy lifestyle, and disease prevention may be better addressed by primary care physicians (PCPs) than oncologists, according to a study published in Cancer Medicine.

The study, conducted in Germany, found most survivors of blood cancers were receiving care at a university hospital and a minority were actually being care for by community oncologists or PCPs. The researchers evaluated follow-up care received by survivors from the University Hospital of Essen using a questionnaire.

“Given the favorable prognosis of many types of blood cancer, there is a wealth of information about long-term treatment side effects, secondary diseases, and quality of life. How and by whom follow-up care is delivered, however, remains largely unexplored,” the authors noted.

Follow-up can be provided in different ways. In one model, oncologists provide follow-up care related to cancer and general practitioners provide other health care at the same time. In another model, survivors of cancer are transferred to PCPs for continued care. In a more complex model, oncologists and general practitioners have complementary roles.

Read more